Novel antifungal agents as salvage therapy for invasive aspergillosis in patients with hematologic malignancies: posaconazole compared with high-dose lipid formulations of amphotericin B alone or in combination with caspofungin.

In patients with hematologic malignancy, invasive aspergillosis continues to be associated with high mortality even when treated with conventional antifungal therapy. To investigate novel antifungal agents, we compared 53 patients who received posaconazole salvage therapy to 52 contemporary control patients who received high-dose lipid formulation of amphotericin B (HD-LPD/AMB at > or = 7.5 mg kg(-1) per day) and 38 other control patients who received caspofungin plus HD-LPD/AMB. Patients in the three groups had similar. The overall response rate to salvage therapy was 40% for posaconazole, 8% for HD-LPD/AMB (P < or = 0.001) and 11% for combination therapy (P < 0.002). Aspergillosis contributed to the death of 40% of posaconazole group, 65% of the HD-LPD/AMB group and 68% of the combination group (P < or = 0.008). By multivariate analysis, posaconazole therapy independently improved response (9.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.8-32.5; P < 0.001). HD-LPD/AMB alone or in combination was associated with a significantly higher rate of nephrotoxicity (P < or = 0.02) and hepatotoxicity (P < 0.03). In conclusion, posaconazole salvage therapy demonstrated greater efficacy and safety than HD-LPD/AMB alone or in combination with caspofungin in the salvage therapy of invasive aspergillosis in hematologic malignancy.

A comparison of aztreonam plus vancomycin and imipenem plus vancomycin as initial therapy for febrile neutropenic cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The improved efficacy of imipenem over other beta-lactam antibiotics in the treatment of febrile neutropenic patients has been attributed to its broad spectrum of activity. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, clinical trial was performed comparing vancomycin 1 g every 12 hours plus imipenem/cilassatin 500 mg every 6 hours and the same dose of vancomycin plus aztreonam 2 g every 6 hours for empiric treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients with cancer. RESULTS: The imipenem regimen cured 76% of the 148 evaluable episodes compared with a 67% cure rate for the 152 episodes treated with the aztreonam regimen (p = 0.1). Most of the polymicrobial infections (77% or 10/13) treated with the imipenem responded, whereas only 38% (5/13) of these infections responded to the aztreonam regimen. Although the cost of the imipenem regimen was less than the cost of the aztreonam regimen, it was associated significantly more with skin rashes (12/194 vs 3/189, p = 0.02). In a multivariate analysis, a poor outcome was independently associated in both instances with the persistence of neutropenia and the presence of pneumonia (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, in a multifactorial analysis that included efficacy, toxicity, and cost, the imipenem and aztreonam regimens were comparable.