Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 115(10): 1609-1616, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32796176

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Although current literature has addressed gastrointestinal presentations including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abnormal liver chemistries, and hyperlipasemia as possible coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) manifestations, the risk and type of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in this population is not well characterized. METHODS: This is a matched case-control (1:2) study with 41 cases of GIB (31 upper and 10 lower) in patients with COVID-19 and 82 matched controls of patients with COVID-19 without GIB. The primary objective was to characterize bleeding etiologies, and our secondary aim was to discuss outcomes and therapeutic approaches. RESULTS: There was no difference in the presenting symptoms of the cases and controls, and no difference in severity of COVID-19 manifestations (P > 0.05) was observed. Ten (32%) patients with upper GIB underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy and 5 (50%) patients with lower GIBs underwent flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy. The most common upper and lower GIB etiologies were gastric or duodenal ulcers (80%) and rectal ulcers related to rectal tubes (60%), respectively. Four of the esophagogastroduodenoscopies resulted in therapeutic interventions, and the 3 patients with rectal ulcers were referred to colorectal surgery for rectal packing. Successful hemostasis was achieved in all 7 cases that required interventions. Transfusion requirements between patients who underwent endoscopic therapy and those who were conservatively managed were not significantly different. Anticoagulation and rectal tube usage trended toward being a risk factor for GIB, although it did not reach statistical significance. DISCUSSION: In COVID-19 patients with GIB, compared with matched controls of COVID-19 patients without GIB, there seemed to be no difference in initial presenting symptoms. Of those with upper and lower GIB, the most common etiology was peptic ulcer disease and rectal ulcers from rectal tubes, respectively. Conservative management seems to be a reasonable initial approach in managing these complex cases, but larger studies are needed to guide management.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiología , Úlcera Péptica/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Recto/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19 , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Endoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Enema/efectos adversos , Enema/instrumentación , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Técnicas Hemostáticas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Úlcera Péptica/complicaciones , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Neumonía Viral/virología , Enfermedades del Recto/etiología , Enfermedades del Recto/terapia , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA