Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 163(2): 601-609, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37199331

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate 4-point per day self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) every 2 weeks compared with every week. METHODS: A total of 104 patients with lifestyle-controlled gestational diabetes (GDMA1) were randomized to 2-weekly or weekly 4-point per day (fasting on awakening and 2-h post-meals) SMBG. Primary outcome was the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level from enrollment to 36 weeks of pregnancy across trial arms. The non-inferiority margin was an HbA1c increase of 0.2%. RESULTS: The mean difference for change in HbA1c from enrollment to 36 weeks was 0.003% (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.098% to +0.093%), within the 0.2% non-inferiority margin. The change in HbA1c level increased significantly within both trial arms-0.275% ± 0.241% (P < 0.001) in 2-weekly arm versus 0.277% ± 0.236% (P < 0.001) in the weekly arm. Participants randomized to 2-weekly SMBG were significantly less likely to receive anti-glycemic treatment-5/52 (9.6%) versus 14/50 (28.0%) (relative risk 0.34, 95% CI 0.13-0.88; P = 0.017). All secondary outcomes-maternal weight gain, preterm delivery, cesarean delivery, birthweight, and neonatal admission-were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: In GDMA1, 2-weekly is non-inferior to weekly SMBG on the change in HbA1c level. Two-weekly SMBG appeared to be adequate for monitoring women with GDMA1. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in ISRCTN registry on March 25, 2022 with trial identification number: ISRCTN13404790 (https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN13404790). The first participant was recruited on April 12, 2022.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Diabetes Gestacional , Terapia Nutricional , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Femenino , Glucemia , Diabetes Gestacional/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemoglobina Glucada , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Hipoglucemiantes
2.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 229(4): 443.e1-443.e9, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37207931

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A prolonged second stage of labor increases the risk of severe perineal laceration, postpartum hemorrhage, operative delivery, and poor Apgar score. The second stage is longer in nulliparas. Maternal pushing during the second stage of labor is an important contributor to the involuntary expulsive force developed by uterine contraction to deliver the fetus. Preliminary data indicate that visual biofeedback during the active second stage hastens birth. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate if visual feedback focusing on the perineum reduced the length of the active second stage of labor in comparison with the control. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in the University Malaya Medical Centre from December 2021 to August 2022. Nulliparous women about to commence the active second stage, at term, with singleton gestation, reassuring fetal status, and no contraindication for vaginal delivery were randomized to live viewing of the maternal introitus (intervention) or maternal face (sham/placebo control) as visual biofeedback during their pushing. A video camera Bluetooth-linked to a tablet computer display screen was used; in the intervention arm, the camera was focused on the introitus, and in the control arm, on the maternal face. Participants were instructed to watch the display screen during their pushing. The primary outcomes were the intervention-to-delivery interval and maternal satisfaction with the pushing experience assessed using a 0-to-10 visual numerical rating scale. Secondary outcomes included mode of delivery, perineal injury, delivery blood loss, birthweight, umbilical cord arterial blood pH and base excess at birth, Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Data were analyzed with the t test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and Fisher exact test, as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 230 women were randomized (115 to intervention and 115 to control arm). The active second stage duration (intervention-to-delivery interval) was a median (interquartile range) of 16 (11-23) and 17 (12-31) minutes (P=.289), and maternal satisfaction with the pushing experience was 9 (8-10) and 7 (6-7) (P<.001) for the intervention and control arm, respectively. Women randomized to the intervention arm were more likely to agree to recommend their management to a friend (88/115 [76.5%] vs 39/115 [33.9%]; relative risk, 2.26 [95% confidence interval, 1.72-2.97]; P<.001) and more likely to have less severe perineal injury (P=.018). CONCLUSION: Real-time viewing of the maternal introitus as visual biofeedback during pushing resulted in higher maternal satisfaction compared with the sham control of viewing the maternal face; however, the time to delivery was not significantly shortened.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico , Segundo Periodo del Trabajo de Parto , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Humanos , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Paridad , Contracción Uterina , Biorretroalimentación Psicológica
3.
Psychol Health Med ; 28(6): 1549-1561, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36120729

RESUMEN

This scoping review describes the research-based mindfulness intervention on anxiety, distress, and depression. The search strategy retrieved articles published in English from 2014 to 2019 and were retrieved across Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. The PRISMA-Scr checklist is a tool to evaluate the quality of the articles. The selection criteria initially included all original articles in English, with 1,527 that were related to mindfulness intervention for anxiety, distress, and depression. A total of 490 full texts were retrieved, and after the abstracts were reviewed, 124 full-text articles were included for eligibility, and the final eight studies were determined. The articles were reviewed and screened for relevance to mindfulness intervention in reducing anxiety, distress, and depression among those with chronic diseases. The results have shown that mindfulness intervention reduces anxiety, distress, and depression among patients with chronic diseases. The review contributes further insight into the fact that mindfulness intervention is also appropriate for other conditions to facilitate reducing psychological symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Atención Plena , Humanos , Ansiedad/terapia , Ansiedad/psicología , Enfermedad Crónica , Depresión/terapia , Depresión/psicología , Atención Plena/métodos , Estrés Psicológico/psicología
4.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 270: 144-150, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35063897

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of combined perineal massage and warm compress to the perineum (MassComp) compared to perineal massage alone during pushing in the second stage of labour in reducing perineal trauma requiring suturing in nulliparas. STUDY DESIGN: A randomised trial was performed in a University hospital, Malaysia from June 2020 to May 2021. 281 term nulliparas who were about to start pushing in the second stage of labour were randomised to combined perineal massage and warm compress or perineal massage alone to the perineum. Primary outcome was suturing for perineal injury (episiotomy or tear). The Chi-square test was used to analyse categorical data, Student t test to compare means and distributions for normally distributed continuous data and Mann Whitney U test for appropriate ordinal data. RESULTS: Data from 277 participants (140 MassComp arm, 137 perineal massage alone arm) were analysed based on modified intention to treat basis. Perineal suturing rates were 133/140(95.0%) [MassComp] vs. 128/137(93.4%) [perineal massage alone] RR 1.02(95%CI 0.96-1.08), P = 0.615. Of the secondary outcomes, Likert scale response to recommend allocated treatment to a friend was 103/140(73.6%) vs. 84/137(61.3%) RR 1.20(95%CI 1.02-1.42)NNTb 9(95%CI 4.3-76.4) P = 0.029, participants' satisfaction with care (visual numerical rating scale 0-10) median [interquartile range] 6[6-8] vs. 6[5-8] P = 0.392, intervention to delivery intervals were 25[15-35] vs. 19[14-30] minutes P = 0.012, major perineal injury (episiotomy, second degree or higher tears) rates 116/140(82.9%) vs. 119/137(86.9%) RR 0.95(95%CI 0.86-1.05), P = 0.404, episiotomy rates 97/140(69.3%) vs. 97/140(70.8%) RR 0.98(95%CI 0.84-1.14), P = 0.795, and spontaneous vaginal delivery rates 103/140(73.6%) vs. 106/137(77.4%) RR 0.95(95%CI 0.83-1.09), P = 0.488 for MassComp vs. perineal massage alone respectively. Other maternal and neonatal outcomes were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Massage and warm compress during pushing did not decrease the likelihood of perineal injury requiring suturing in nulliparas when compared to perineal massage alone. Women were more likely to recommend massage and warm compress during pushing to a friend.


Asunto(s)
Calor/uso terapéutico , Masaje , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto , Perineo , Episiotomía , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Segundo Periodo del Trabajo de Parto/fisiología , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/terapia , Atención Perinatal/métodos , Perineo/lesiones , Embarazo , Heridas y Lesiones/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA