Coronary CT Angiography CAD-RADS versus Coronary Artery Calcium Score in Patients with Acute Chest Pain.

Background The Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) was established in 2016 to standardize the reporting of coronary artery disease at coronary CT angiography (CCTA). Purpose To assess the prognostic value of CAD-RADS at CCTA for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. Materials and Methods This multicenter retrospective observational cohort study was conducted at four qualifying university teaching hospitals. Patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain underwent CCTA between January 2010 and December 2017. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate risk factors for MACEs, including clinical factors, coronary artery calcium score (CACS), and CAD-RADS categories. The prognostic value compared with clinical risk factors and CACS was also assessed. Results A total of 1492 patients were evaluated (mean age, 58 years ± 14 years [standard deviation]; 759 men). During a median follow-up period of 31.5 months, 103 of the 1492 patients (7%) experienced MACEs. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that a moderate to severe CACS was associated with MACEs after adjusting for clinical risk factors (hazard ratio [HR] range, 2.3-4.4; P value range, <.001 to <.01). CAD-RADS categories from 3 to 4 or 5 (HR range, 3.2-8.5; P < .001) and high-risk plaques (HR = 3.6, P < .001) were also associated with MACEs. The C statistics revealed that the CAD-RADS score improved risk stratification more than that using clinical risk factors alone or combined with CACS (C-index, 0.85 vs 0.63 [P < .001] and 0.76 [P < .01], respectively). Conclusion The Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System classification had an incremental prognostic value compared with the coronary artery calcium score in the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Vliegenthart in this issue.

Hook-wire localization versus lipiodol localization for patients with pulmonary lesions having ground-glass opacity.

OBJECTIVES: Accurate and safe preoperative localization is useful for video-assisted thoracic surgery of small pulmonary lesions with ground-glass opacity (GGO). However, the optimal localization method is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the usefulness and safety of the lipiodol and hook-wire localization techniques for video-assisted thoracic surgery of GGO lesions. METHODS: This prospective, non-randomized comparative study was conducted between April 2014 and December 2016 at 8 qualifying university teaching hospitals. Two-hundred-fifty patients with pulmonary lesions having GGO were included. Patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the lipiodol (n = 125, 4 hospitals) or hook-wire group (n = 125, 4 hospitals) for preoperative localization procedures. Participants underwent preoperative localization via the lipiodol or hook-wire technique followed by thoracoscopic surgery. The primary endpoint was the procedure success rate. RESULTS: The procedure success rates (hook-wire vs lipiodol group) were 94.40% versus 99.16% (P = .08). Localization-related complications occurred in 53.60% versus 48.33% of patients (P = .49). Hemorrhage rates were significantly greater in the hook-wire group than in the lipiodol group (21.6% vs 5.83%, P < .001). The lipiodol procedure time was significantly longer than that of the hook-wire technique (20.69 ± 9.34 vs 17.15 ± 7.91 minutes, P = .001). The initially positive surgical resection margin was significantly greater in the hook-wire group than in the lipiodol group (10.89% vs 2.38%, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in success rate between the hook-wire and lipiodol methods. However, the hemorrhage rate was significantly greater in the hook-wire group, whereas the hook-wire group showed greater initially positive surgical resection margins.

Relationship between Lower Dose and Injection Speed of Iodinated Contrast Material for CT and Acute Hypersensitivity Reactions: An Observational Study.

BackgroundThere are few data on the relationship between acute hypersensitivity reactions and the dose and injection rate of iodinated contrast material for CT.PurposeTo determine the relationship between lower dose and injection speed of iodinated contrast material for CT and the rate of acute hypersensitivity reactions.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study included adults (age ≥18 years) undergoing nonionic iodinated contrast material-enhanced abdominal CT between August 2016 and January 2017 (control period) and between August 2017 and January 2018 (intervention period); all examinations were conducted in an outpatient setting. Compared with CT during the control period, CT during the intervention period involved a reduced dose of contrast material achieved by lowering the CT tube voltage. CT examinations in the control period were performed with 120 kVp, a contrast material dose of 2 mL/kg (maximum, 150 mL), and an injection speed of 3 or 4 mL/sec. CT examinations in the intervention period were performed with 100 kVp, a contrast material dose of 1.5 mL/kg (maximum, 130 mL), and an injection speed of 2.5 or 3 mL/sec. Per-examination rates of acute hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast material were compared between the control and intervention periods with use of a multivariable Poisson regression model, the parameters of which were estimated by using generalized estimating equations with an independence correlation structure.ResultsA total of 21947 adults (mean age ± standard deviation, 59 years ± 12; 8797 women [40%]) underwent 25119 CT examinations during the control period; 23019 adults (mean age, 59 years ± 12; 9538 women [41%]) underwent 26491 CT examinations during the intervention period. The rate of acute hypersensitivity reactions was 1.42% (376 of 26491 examinations; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.28%, 1.57%) in the intervention period and 1.86% (468 of 25119 examinations; 95% CI: 1.70%, 2.04%) in the control period, with a multivariable-adjusted relative risk of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.74, 0.99; P = .03).ConclusionReduction in the dose and injection speed of iodinated contrast material for CT was associated with a lower rate of acute hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast material.© RSNA, 2019Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Gadolinium deposition in the brain: association with various GBCAs using a generalized additive model.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationship between the number of administrations of various gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) and increased T1 signal intensity in the globus pallidus (GP) and dentate nucleus (DN). METHODS: This retrospective study included 122 patients who underwent double-dose GBCA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Two radiologists calculated GP-to-thalamus (TH) signal intensity ratio, DN-to-pons signal intensity ratio and relative change (Rchange) between the baseline and final examinations. Interobserver agreement was evaluated. The relationships between Rchange and several factors, including number of each GBCA administrations, were analysed using a generalized additive model. RESULTS: Six patients (4.9%) received linear GBCAs (mean 20.8 number of administration; range 15-30), 44 patients (36.1%) received macrocyclic GBCAs (mean 26.1; range 14-51) and 72 patients (59.0%) received both types of GBCAs (mean 31.5; range 12-65). Interobserver agreement was almost perfect (0.99; 95% CI: 0.99-0.99). Rchange (DN:pons) was associated with gadodiamide (p = 0.006) and gadopentetate dimeglumine (p < 0.001), but not with other GBCAs. Rchange (GP:TH) was not associated with GBCA administration. CONCLUSIONS: Previous administration of linear agents gadoiamide and gadopentetate dimeglumine is associated with increased T1 signal intensity in the DN, whereas macrocyclic GBCAs do not show an association. KEY POINTS: • Certain linear GBCAs are associated with T1 signal change in the dentate nucleus. • The signal change is related to the administration number of certain linear GBCAs. • Difference in signal change may reflect differences in stability of agents.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Preoperative Lung Localization for Pulmonary Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: An optimal method of preoperative localization for pulmonary nodules has yet to be established. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the success and complication rates associated with three pulmonary nodule localization methods for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS): hook-wire localization, microcoil localization, and lipiodol localization. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases for prospective or retrospective English language studies of VATS localization in adult patients. A noncomparative, random effects model-based meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled success and complication rates for the three localization methods. RESULTS: A total of 46 clinical studies were enrolled, including 30, 9, and 7 studies of hook-wire, microcoil, and lipiodol localization, respectively. The successful targeting rates for hook-wire, microcoil, and lipiodol localization were 0.98 (95% CI, 0.97-0.99), 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99), and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00), respectively, with corresponding successful operative field targeting rates of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91-0.96), 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.98), and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00), respectively. In addition, the successful VATS rates with hook-wire, microcoil, and lipiodol localization were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.97), 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94-0.99), and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00), respectively. Regarding complications, hook-wire, microcoil, and lipiodol localization were associated with pneumothorax rates of 0.35 (95% CI, 0.28-0.43), 0.16 (95% CI, 0.07-0.34), and 0.31 (95% CI, 0.20-0.46), respectively and hemorrhage rates of 0.16 (95% CI, 0.11-0.23), 0.06 (95% CI, 0.03-0.11), and 0.12 (95% CI, 0.05-0.23), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: All three localization methods yielded similarly highly successful targeting rates. However, hook-wire localization had a relatively lower successful operative field targeting rate because of dislodgement or migration. Lipiodol localization had the highest overall success rate, and microcoil localization yielded the lowest complication rates.