Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis ; 27(1): 67-71, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32147004

RESUMEN

In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration regulates the efficacy and safety of pharmaceutical drugs. This government agency was formed in direct response to a mass poisoning and more than 100 deaths from kidney failure due to a medicinal toxic alcohol exposure. In contrast, the Food and Drug Administration also regulates the use of vitamins, minerals, herbs, or botanicals as dietary supplements, banning specific medical claims but requiring no documentation of efficacy. Safety of dietary supplements is only ensured through reporting of adverse events and rarely through intervention. Consumers should be aware that supplements may in fact contain actual pharmaceuticals or nothing of value and have significant toxic potential. Toxicity due to Chinese herbal medicines, aristolochic acid, amygdalin, hypervitaminosis D, and heavy metal contamination is reviewed.


Asunto(s)
Suplementos Dietéticos/efectos adversos , Preparaciones de Plantas/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Renal/inducido químicamente , Vitaminas/efectos adversos , Seguridad de Productos para el Consumidor , Control de Medicamentos y Narcóticos , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Insuficiencia Renal/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Renal/terapia , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
2.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 10(8): 1389-96, 2015 Aug 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26220814

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patients with ESRD on dialysis live in a complex sociomedical situation and are dependent on technology and infrastructure, such as transportation, electricity, and water, to sustain their lives. Interruptions of this infrastructure by natural disasters can result in devastating outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Between November of 2013 and April of 2014, a cross-sectional survey was conducted of patients who received maintenance hemodialysis before and after the landfall of Hurricane Sandy on October 29, 2012 in lower Manhattan, New York. The primary outcome was the number of missed dialysis sessions after the storm. Dialysis-specific and general disaster preparedness were assessed using checklists prepared by the National Kidney Foundation and US Homeland Security, respectively. RESULTS: In total, 598 patients were approached, and 357 (59.7%) patients completed the survey. Participants were 60.2% men and 30.0% black, with a median age of 60 years old; 94 (26.3%) participants missed dialysis (median of two sessions [quartile 1 to quartile 3 =1-3]), and 236 (66.1%) participants received dialysis at nonregular dialysis unit(s): 209 (58.5%) at affiliated dialysis unit(s) and 27 (7.6%) at emergency rooms. The percentages of participants who carried their insurance information and detailed medication list were 75.9% and 44.3%, respectively. Enhancement of the dialysis emergency packet after the hurricane was associated with a significantly higher cache of medical records at home at follow-up survey (P<0.001, Fisher's exact test). Multivariate Poisson regression analysis showed that dialysis-specific preparedness (incidence rate ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.87 to 0.98), other racial ethnicity (incidence rate ratio, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.20 to 0.57), dialysis treatment in affiliated units (incidence rate ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.51 to 0.94), and older age (incidence rate ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.97 to 0.99) were associated with a significantly lower incidence rate ratio of missed dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: There is still room to improve the preparedness for natural disasters of patients with ESRD. Provider- or facility-oriented enhancement of awareness of the disease and preparedness should be a priority.


Asunto(s)
Defensa Civil/organización & administración , Tormentas Ciclónicas , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Desastres , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Diálisis Renal , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Concienciación , Lista de Verificación , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Fallo Renal Crónico/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Organizacionales , Análisis Multivariante , Ciudad de Nueva York , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
3.
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis ; 18(3): 167-71, 2011 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21531322

RESUMEN

Extracorporeal removal of drugs was first attempted in 1913, by John Jacob Abel. Previously known to be a rarity, dialysis and to a lesser extent hemoperfusion have now become obvious tools for nephrologists in treating life-threatening cases of poisoning. Moreover, for dialysis patients, dialysis along with chelation therapy for removal of aluminum, once known to be common in the United States, is resurging in some countries. This article will discuss the principles of drug removal, the indications for dialysis, and give a brief outline of poisons amenable to dialysis.


Asunto(s)
Hemoperfusión , Diálisis Peritoneal , Intoxicación/terapia , Diálisis Renal , Humanos , Selección de Paciente
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA