Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BJS Open ; 7(6)2023 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37931233

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Radical surgery is the standard treatment for rectal cancer, but can impact quality of life. Recently, the concept of total neoadjuvant therapy with a watch-and-wait strategy has been proposed in which patients with a cCR after total neoadjuvant therapy do not proceed to surgery. However, most investigations of a watch-and-wait strategy have reported cases where cCR was achieved coincidentally via total neoadjuvant therapy. The aim is to assess whether total neoadjuvant therapy is effective in early-stage rectal cancer in patients that achieve cCR and are offered a watch-and-wait strategy. METHODS: JCOG2010 (TOWARd) is a multi-institutional, single-arm phase II/III confirmatory investigation of the safety and efficacy of total neoadjuvant therapy followed by a watch-and-wait strategy for rectal cancer. Key eligibility criteria include cT2-3 N0 M0 rectal adenocarcinoma, tumour diameter less than or equal to 5 cm, age 18-75 years, performance status 0-1, and no history of pelvic irradiation or rectal surgery. Total neoadjuvant therapy involves neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (capecitabine and radiotherapy: 45 Gy/25 fractions to the whole pelvis plus boost of 5.4 Gy/3 fractions to the primary tumour) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (four cycles of capecitabine/oxaliplatin). Patients will be re-staged every 8 weeks after total neoadjuvant therapy, and those who achieve cCR will undergo a watch-and-wait strategy, those with near complete response will undergo a watch-and-wait strategy or local resection, and those with an incomplete response will undergo radical surgery. The primary endpoint is the cCR rate in phase II and 5-year overall survival in phase III. Secondary endpoints include postoperative anal, urinary, and sexual function. A total of 105 patients (phase II, 40 patients; phase III, 65 patients) will be enrolled over 3.5 years. CONCLUSION: This trial will determine whether total neoadjuvant therapy and a watch-and-wait strategy is an effective alternative to radical surgery for early-stage rectal cancer in patients with cT2-3 N0 M0 and tumour size less than or equal to 5 cm. REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs031220288 (https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs031220288).


Asunto(s)
Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias del Recto , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Capecitabina , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto
2.
Future Oncol ; 19(32): 2147-2155, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37882373

RESUMEN

Macroscopic type 4 and large type 3 gastric cancer, mostly overlapping with scirrhous or linitis plastica type, exhibit a highly invasive nature and show unfavorable prognosis after curative surgery, even with adjuvant chemotherapy. A randomized phase III trial (JCOG0501) failed to demonstrate a survival advantage of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin for this population. The current authors initiated a randomized phase II study comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin/docetaxel versus docetaxel/oxaliplatin/S-1 for type 4 and large type 3 gastric cancer. 76 patients are planned to be enrolled over two years. The primary end point is the proportion of patients with a pathological response (grade 1b or higher) and secondary end points include overall survival and adverse events. Clinical Trial Registration: jRCTs031230231 (rctportal.niph.go.jp).


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Docetaxel/uso terapéutico , Oxaliplatino/efectos adversos , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto
3.
Future Oncol ; 19(28): 1897-1904, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37750332

RESUMEN

The prognosis of locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) with surgical resection followed only by adjuvant chemotherapy is poor. Preoperative chemotherapy for LACC patients with risk factors such as cT4bN+ or cT3-4aN2-3 has attracted attention. Here, the authors describe the rationale and design of JCOG2006, a randomized phase II study comparing preoperative chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 versus FOLFOXIRI for LACC. Their efficacy and safety are evaluated and a determination of which is the more promising treatment will be conducted in a subsequent phase III trial. A total of 86 patients will be accrued from 44 institutions over 2 years. The primary end point is the proportion of patients with a Tumor Regression Score of 0-2, and secondary end points include overall survival, response rate and adverse events. Clinical Trial Registration: jRCTs031210365 (https://jrct.niph.go.jp/).


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias del Colon , Humanos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA