Outcomes of treatment for localized prostate cancer in a single institution: comparison of radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy by propensity score matching analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and low-dose-rate brachytherapy (BT) using propensity score matching analysis in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. METHODS: A group of 2273 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer between January 2004 and December 2015 at the Yokohama City University hospital were identified. The records of 1817 of these patients, who were followed up for a minimum of 2 years, were reviewed; 462 were treated with RP, 319 with IMRT, and 1036 with BT. The patients were categorized according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk classification criteria, and biochemical outcomes and overall survival rates were examined. Biochemical failure for RP was defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels > 0.2 ng/ml, and for IMRT and BT as nadir PSA level + 2 ng/ml. Propensity scores were calculated using multivariable logistic regression based on covariates, including the patient's age, preoperative PSA, Gleason score, number of positive cores, and clinical T stage. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 77 months for the RP, 54 months for IMRT, and 66 months for BT patients. After the propensity scores were adjusted, a total of 372 (186 each) and 598 (299 each) patients were categorized into RP vs IMRT and RP vs BT groups, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis did not show any statistically significant differences in terms of overall survival rate between these groups (RP vs IMRT: p = 0.220; RP vs BT: p = 0.429). IMRT was associated with improved biochemical failure-free survival compared to RP in all risk groups (high-risk: p < 0.001; intermediate-risk: p = 0.009; low-risk: p = 0.001), whereas significant differences were observed only in the intermediate-risk group (p = 0.003) within the RP vs BT group. CONCLUSION: The results of our propensity score analysis of mid-term localized prostate cancer treatment outcomes demonstrated no significant differences in the overall survival rate. Despite the difference in biochemical failure definition between surgery and radiotherapeutic approaches, the results of this study demonstrate improved biochemical control favoring IMRT and BT as compared to RP.

Thermochemoradiotherapy Using Superselective Intra-arterial Infusion for Patients With Oral Cancer With Cervical Lymph Node Metastases.

AIM: We aimed to retrospectively investigate the outcomes and pathological effects of retrograde superselective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy (IACRT) combined with hyperthermia on metastatic lymph nodes of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with lymph node metastasis from oral cancer were treated with IACRT using cisplatin plus docetaxel combined with hyperthermia prior to surgical removal 8 weeks after completion of IACRT and hyperthermia. The locoregional control and overall survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients received the combination therapy of whom 26 received it as definitive treatment and in the rest, it was administered as preoperative treatment. The 5-year locoregional control and overall survivaI rates were 95.6% and 80.2% in the definitive-treatment group, and 100% and 66.6% in the preoperative-treatment group, respectively. CONCLUSION: The combination therapy provided good outcomes in patients with lymph node metastases from advanced oral cancer.

Retrograde superselective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy combined with hyperthermia and cetuximab for carcinoma of the buccal mucosa with N3 lymph node metastasis: a case report.

We herein report a case of squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa with N3 cervical lymph node metastasis in a 63-year-old man. The patient was treated with combination therapy comprising radiotherapy (2 Gy/day, total of 70 Gy), superselective intra-arterial chemotherapy via a superficial temporal artery (docetaxel, total of 70 mg/m2 and cisplatin, total of 175 mg/m2), cetuximab (initial dose of 400 mg/m2 with subsequent weekly doses of 250 mg/m2 intravenously), and four sessions of hyperthermia for cervical lymph node metastases. The patient responded well to the therapy, with a complete response of the primary tumor. Radical neck dissection was performed with reconstructive surgery, including resection of the overlying skin. A pathologic complete response was achieved for the N3 and all other cervical lymph node metastases. The patient showed no evidence of recurrence in the 3 years following treatment. Based on the findings in the present case, the use of retrograde superselective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy combined with hyperthermia and cetuximab seems to be a promising modality for patients with N3 cervical lymph node metastasis of oral cancer.

Calcium Phosphate Cement Paste Injection as a Fiducial Marker of Cervical Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Calcium phosphate cement (CPC) is used to fill bone voids in dental, orthopedic, and craniofacial applications. This study evaluated CPC marker as an injectable non-metallic fiducial marker. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six patients received 3-5 injections of CPC paste placed at a depth of 10 mm into tumors of the cervix before treatment planning CT (TPCT). Patients were treated with external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and high-dose rate brachytherapy (BT). We investigated marker visibility on cone-beam CT (CBCT), T2-weighted MRI, and interfraction of the marker motion for cervical cancer patients. RESULTS: Of a total of 22 visible CPC markers at TPCT, 17 CPC markers were visible on the first CBCT. Excluding one patient, all markers were visible on CBCT during EBRT. Of 16 visible CPC markers on CBCT, 13 CPC markers were visible on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) obtained before BT. For CPC marker centroid movement, the mean-of-means/systematic variation/random variation were 0.2/0.4/1.4, -1.6/5.1/4.1, and -3.4/2.1/2.8 mm for the left-right, dorsal-ventral, and cranial-caudal directions, respectively. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of a CPC marker injected into tumors of the cervix. It can be visualized on CBCT and MRI with reductions in marker loss and artifacts.