Comparative review of the safety and efficacy of ferric carboxymaltose versus standard medical care for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in bariatric and gastric surgery patients.

BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a common finding in patients after bariatric surgery. The cause is multifactorial including reduced oral iron intake and malabsorption. While many patients can be managed with oral supplements, parenteral iron may be needed to restore and maintain iron stores. METHODS: Subjects who had previous bariatric surgery and had participated in phase 3 industry-sponsored clinical trials designed to assess the safety and/or efficacy of intravenous (IV) ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) were retrospectively selected from the databases of each of these studies. Demographic data, efficacy measures [hemoglobin, ferritin, and transferrin saturation (TSAT)], and adverse events were compared between FCM and other agents utilized as comparators in the trials. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-one subjects from the intention to treat (ITT) population were included (mean age 49 years, BMI 33 kg/m(2), including 253 females). FCM had similar or improved efficacy (p < 0.05) in terms of increasing hemoglobin, ferritin, and TSAT values when compared to other iron products used as standard of care for IDA. The incidence of adverse events in the FCM patients (n = 123) versus patients receiving any IV iron (n = 126) was 61 and 56.3 %, respectively. The adverse events were similar in both groups with the exception of a transient decrease in serum phosphate which was observed more frequently in the FCM group. CONCLUSIONS: These data in post-bariatric surgery IDA patients suggest that FCM is a safe and effective alternative to existing iron products permitting higher and thus less frequent individual doses.

Hepcidin levels predict nonresponsiveness to oral iron therapy in patients with iron deficiency anemia.

Levels of hepcidin, a major regulator of iron homeostasis, may identify patients with iron deficiency anemia (IDA) who will not respond to oral iron therapy. In this study, IDA patients underwent a 14-day trial (run-in) course of ferrous sulfate therapy. Nonresponders (Hgb increase <1 g/dL with 67% compliance rate) were randomized to IV ferric carboxymaltose (FCM; two injections of 750 mg) or further oral iron for 14 days. Screening hepcidin levels were 38.4 versus 11.3 ng/mL, P = 0.0002 in nonresponders versus responders to a trial of oral iron. Hepcidin of > 20 ng/mL, showed sensitivity of 41.3%, specificity of 84.4%, and positive predictive value of 81.6% for predicting nonresponsiveness to oral iron. PPVs for ferritin> 30 ng/mL or transferrin saturation (TSAT)>15% were 59.2 and 55%, respectively. Negative predictive values for hepcidin, ferritin, and TSAT were 46.3, 22.7, and 19.7, respectively. FCM versus oral iron showed Hgb increases of ≥ 1 gm/dL in 65.3% versus 20.8% (P < 0.0001) and Hgb increases of 1.7 ± 1.3 versus 0.6 ± 0.9 g/dL (P = 0.0025), respectively. We conclude that hepcidin predicts nonresponsiveness to oral iron in patients with IDA and is superior to TSAT or ferritin for this purpose. Nonresponse to oral iron therapy does not rule out IDA, since two-thirds of patients subsequently responded to intravenous iron.