Patient-reported outcomes with hypoglossal nerve stimulation for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) has recently been introduced as an alternative treatment for patients with OSA. A large number of studies have demonstrated substantial changes in OSA with this therapy by reducing respiratory events and improving symptoms such as daytime sleepiness and quality of life. The objective of this review was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate patient-reported outcomes and experience with HNS therapy. METHODS: A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Web of Science was performed to identify randomized controlled and observational studies reporting subjective outcomes with different HNS systems in patients with OSA. Abstracts of 406 articles were screened and a subset of 55 articles were reviewed for eligibility. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Meta-analysis using RevMan was performed when > 2 studies were identified that reported data on a specific outcome. RESULTS: Thirty-four publications reporting data on 3785 patients with a mean follow-up of 11.8 ± 12.2 months were identified and included in the meta-analysis. The analysis revealed a pooled effect of 4.59 points improvement in daytime sleepiness as measured by the ESS questionnaire (Z = 42.82, p < .001), 2.84 points improvement in daytime functioning as measured by the FOSQ score (Z = 28.38, p < .001), and 1.77 points improvement in sleep quality as measured by the PSQI questionnaire (Z = 2.53, p = .010). Patient-reported experience was consistently positive and revealed additional relevant aspects from this perspective. CONCLUSION: HNS therapy significantly improves quality of life in patients with OSA and reliably produces clinically meaningful effects on daytime sleepiness, daytime functioning, and sleep quality. Treatment regularly meets or exceeds the minimum clinically important differences defined for the respective instruments. Additional research is needed to further investigate effects on quality of life beyond improvements in daytime sleepiness and daytime functioning.

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation versus positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnea.

PURPOSE: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) has been shown to treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) effectively. The aim of this study was to compare HNS with positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment regarding outcome parameters: (1) sleepiness, (2) apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), and (3) effectiveness. METHODS: Propensity score matching with nearest neighbor algorithm was used to compare outcomes of HNS and PAP therapy in a real-world setting. Data were collected at baseline and 12 months after initiating OSA treatment including demographics, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), AHI, and objective adherence data. To account for overall treatment efficacy, the mean disease alleviation (MDA) was calculated. RESULTS: Of 227 patients who received treatment consecutively, 126 could be matched 1:1 with regard to age, body mass index, and AHI. After matching, no statistically significant differences between the groups were found. A clinically important symptom improvement was seen at 12 months in both cohorts, though there was a greater difference in ESS improvement in patients treated with HNS (8.0 ± 5.1 points vs. 3.9 ± 6.8 points; p = 0.042). In both groups, mean posttreatment AHI was significantly reduced (HNS: 8.1 ± 6.3/h; PAP: 6.6 ± 8.0/h; p < 0.001). Adherence after 12 months among patients treated with HNS was higher than in those receiving PAP therapy (5.0 ± 2.6 h/night; 4.0 ± 2.1 h/night) but not with statistical significance. Overall effectiveness calculated with the MDA was 59% in patients treated with HNS compared to 51% receiving PAP. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with HNS therapy had significantly greater improvements in daytime sleepiness compared to PAP therapy, while the mean reduction of AHI and overall effectiveness were comparable for both treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT03756805.

Obstruction level associated with outcome in hypoglossal nerve stimulation.

PURPOSE: Selective hypoglossal nerve stimulation (sHNS) constitutes an effective surgical alternative for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). sHNS results in tongue protrusion and consecutive alleviation of obstructions at the tongue base level (lower obstructions). Furthermore, obstructions at the soft palate level (upper obstructions) may be prevented through palatoglossal coupling as seen on sleep endoscopy. However, it has not been studied if the distribution of obstruction level during a whole night measurement is a relevant factor for the treatment outcome. METHODS: Obstruction levels were measured with a manometry system during a whole night of sleep in 26 patients with OSA (f = 1, m = 25; age 59.4 ± 11.3; BMI = 29.6 ± 3.6) either before (n = 9) or after sHNS implantation (n = 12). Five patients received a measurement before and after implantation. Obstructions were categorized into velar (soft palate and above), infravelar (below soft palate), and multilevel obstructions. An association between obstruction level and treatment outcome was calculated. RESULTS: The mean distribution of preoperative obstruction level could be divided into the following: 38% velar, 46% multilevel, and 16% infravelar obstructions. Patients with a good treatment response (defined as AHI < 15/h and AHI reduction of 50%) had fewer preoperative velar obstructions compared to non-responder (17% vs. 54%, p-value = 0.006). In patients measured after sHNS implantation, a significantly higher rate of multilevel obstructions per hour was measured in non-responders (p-value = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Selective hypoglossal nerve stimulation was more effective in patients with fewer obstructions at the soft palate level. Manometry may be a complementary diagnostic procedure for the selection of patients for HNS.

A Noninferiority Analysis of 3- vs 2-Incision Techniques for Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator Implantation.

OBJECTIVE: The only hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) device available for US clinical use is implanted through 3 incisions. A recently proposed 2-incision modification moved the respiratory sensing lead from the fifth to the second intercostal space to eliminate the third lower chest incision. This study compared perioperative data and therapeutic outcomes between the techniques. STUDY DESIGN: Noninferiority cohort analysis of a retrospective and prospective registry study. SETTING: Tertiary care and community surgical centers. METHODS: Patients with obstructive sleep apnea underwent HNS implantation via a modified 2-incision technique (I2). A cohort previously implanted via the standard 3-incision technique (I3) were 1:1 propensity score matched for a noninferiority analysis of postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: There were 404 I3 patients and 223 I2 patients across 6 participating centers. Operative time decreased from 128.7 minutes (95% CI, 124.5-132.9) in I3 patients to 86.6 minutes (95% CI, 83.7-97.6) in I2 patients (P < .001). Postoperative sleep study data were available for 76 I2 patients who were matched to I3 patients. The change in apnea-hypopnea index between the cohorts was statistically noninferior (a priori noninferiority margin: 7.5 events/h; mean difference, 1.51 [97.5% CI upper bound, 5.86]). There were no significant differences between the cohorts for baseline characteristics, perioperative adverse event rates, or change in Epworth Sleepiness Score (P > .05). CONCLUSION: In a multicenter registry, a 2-incision implant technique for a commercially available HNS device had a statistically noninferior therapeutic efficacy profile when compared with the standard 3-incision approach. The 2-incision technique is safe and effective for HNS implantation.

Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Usage by Therapy Nonresponders.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to examine differences in therapy usage and outcomes of therapy between responder (R) and nonresponder (NR) groups in an international, multicenter prospective registry of patients undergoing hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). STUDY DESIGN: Database analysis (level III). SETTING: International, multicenter registry. METHODS: The studied registry prospectively collects data pre- and postimplantation, including sleep parameters, Epworth score, patient experience, and safety questions, over the course of 12 months. Patients are defined as a "responder" based on Sher criteria, which require a final apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of ≤20 and a final AHI reduction of >50% at their 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, there were 497 (69%) R and 220 (31%) NR. Most patients in both groups experienced improvement in quality of life following implantation (96% of R; 77% of NR) with reductions in oxygen desaturation index and Epworth score. At final follow-up, the R group demonstrated significantly better adherence to recommended therapy (>4 hours/night) (P = .001), average hours of nightly use (P = .001), final Epworth scores (P = .001), and degree of subjective improvement (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients classified as NR to upper airway stimulation continue to use therapy with improvement in percent time of sleep with O2 <90%, reduction in daytime sleepiness, and improvement in quality of life. Therefore, ongoing usage of the device should be encouraged in NR patients who note improvement while integrating additional strategies to lower the long-term effects of OSA.

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea: updated position paper of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery.

Since the first statement of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) is meanwhile an established treatment option for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). There are three HNS systems available in Germany which differ in their technical details of the underlying comparable basic principle. For the unilateral HNS with respiratory sensing, several comparative studies, high-volume register analysis and long-term reports exist. The continuous HNS without respiratory sensing does not require a sleep endoscopy for indication. For the bilateral continuous HNS as the single partially implantable device, a feasibility study exists. For indication, the assessment of positive airway pressure failure by sleep medicine is crucial, and the decision for HNS should be made in discussion of other treatment options for at least moderate OSA. The implantation center holds primarily responsibility among the interdisciplinary sleep team and is primary contact for the patient in problems. This depicts why structural processes are required to secure outcome quality and minimize the complications. The aftercare of HNS patients can be provided interdisciplinary and by different medical institutions, whereat, minimal reporting standards to document outcome and usage are recommended.

Impact of Body Mass Index and Discomfort on Upper Airway Stimulation: ADHERE Registry 2020 Update.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To provide the ADHERE registry Upper Airway Stimulation (UAS) outcomes update, including analyses grouped by body mass index (BMI) and therapy discomfort. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study. METHODS: ADHERE captures UAS outcomes including apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), therapy usage, patient satisfaction, clinician assessment, and safety over a 1-year period. BMI ≤32 kg/m2 (BMI32 ) and 32 < BMI ≤35 kg/m2 (BMI35 ) group outcomes were examined. RESULTS: One thousand eight hundred forty-nine patients enrolled in ADHERE, 1,019 reached final visit, 843 completed the visit. Significant changes in AHI (-20.9, P < .0001) and ESS (- 4.4, P < .0001) were demonstrated. Mean therapy usage was 5.6 ± 2.2 hr/day. Significant therapy use difference was present in patients with reported discomfort versus no discomfort (4.9 ± 2.5 vs. 5.7 ± 2.1 hr/day, P = .01). Patients with discomfort had higher final visit mean AHI versus without discomfort (18.9 ± 18.5 vs. 13.5 ± 13.7 events/hr, P = .01). Changes in AHI and ESS were not significantly different. Serious adverse events reported in 2.3% of patients. Device revision rate was 1.9%. Surgical success was less likely in BMI35 versus BMI32 patients (59.8% vs. 72.2%, P = .02). There was a significant therapy use difference: 5.8 ± 2.0 hr/day in BMI32 versus 5.2 ± 2.2 hr/day in BMI35 (P = .028). CONCLUSIONS: Data from ADHERE demonstrate high efficacy rates for UAS. Although surgical response rate differs between BMI32 and BMI35 patient groups, the AHI and ESS reduction is similar. Discomfort affects therapy adherence and efficacy. Thus, proper therapy settings adjustment to ensure comfort is imperative to improve outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:2616-2624, 2021.

Improving outcomes of hypoglossal nerve stimulation therapy: current practice, future directions, and research gaps. Proceedings of the 2019 International Sleep Surgery Society Research Forum.

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) has evolved as a novel and effective therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea. Despite positive published outcomes of HGNS, there exist uncertainties regarding proper patient selection, surgical technique, and the reporting of outcomes and individual factors that impact therapy effectiveness. According to current guidelines, this therapy is indicated for select patients, and recommendations are based on the Stimulation Therapy for Apnea Reduction or STAR trial. Ongoing research and physician experiences continuously improve methods to optimize the therapy. An understanding of the way in which airway anatomy, obstructive sleep apnea phenotypes, individual health status, psychological conditions, and comorbid sleep disorders influence the effectiveness of HGNS is essential to improve outcomes and expand therapy indications. This article presents discussions on current evidence, future directions, and research gaps for HGNS therapy from the 10th International Surgical Sleep Society expert research panel. CITATION: Suurna MV, Jacobowitz O, Chang J, et al. Improving outcomes of hypoglossal nerve stimulation therapy: current practice, future directions and research gaps. Proceedings of the 2019 International Sleep Surgery Society Research Forum. J Clin Sleep Med. 2021;17(12):2477-2487.

Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy and Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Outcomes: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine the association between findings of blinded reviews of preoperative drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) and outcomes of hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter cohort study of 343 adults who underwent treatment of OSA with HNS from 10 academic medical centers was performed. Preoperative DISE videos were scored by four blinded reviewers using the VOTE Classification and evaluation of a possible primary structure contributing to airway obstruction. Consensus DISE findings were examined for an association with surgical outcomes based on therapy titration polysomnogram (tPSG). Treatment response was defined by a decrease of ≥50% in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) to <15 events/hour. RESULTS: Study participants (76% male, 60.4 ± 11.0 years old) had a body mass index of 29.2 ± 3.6 kg/m2 . AHI decreased (35.6 ± 15.2 to 11.0 ± 14.1 events/hour; P < .001) on the tPSG, with a 72.6% response rate. Complete palate obstruction (vs. none) was associated with the greatest difference in AHI improvement (-26.8 ± 14.9 vs. -19.2 ± 12.8, P = .02). Complete (vs. partial/none) tongue-related obstruction was associated with increased odds of treatment response (78% vs. 68%, P = .043). Complete (vs. partial/none) oropharyngeal lateral wall-related obstruction was associated with lower odds of surgical response (58% vs. 74%, P = .042). CONCLUSIONS: The DISE finding of primary tongue contribution to airway obstruction was associated with better outcomes, whereas the opposite was true for the oropharyngeal lateral walls. This study suggests that the role for DISE in counseling candidates for HNS extends beyond solely for excluding complete concentric collapse related to the velum. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:1676-1682, 2021.

Comparison of Traditional Upper Airway Surgery and Upper Airway Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

OBJECTIVE: To compare patients with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) undergoing traditional single and multilevel sleep surgery to those undergoing upper airway stimulation (UAS). STUDY DESIGN: Case control study comparing retrospective cohort of patients undergoing traditional sleep surgery to patients undergoing UAS enrolled in the ADHERE registry. SETTING: 8 multinational academic medical centers. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 233 patients undergoing prior single or multilevel traditional sleep surgery and meeting study inclusion criteria were compared to 465 patients from the ADHERE registry who underwent UAS. We compared preoperative and postoperative demographic, quality of life, and polysomnographic data. We also evaluated treatment response rates. RESULTS: The pre and postoperative apnea hypopnea index (AHI) was 33.5 and 15 in the traditional sleep surgery group and 32 and 10 in the UAS group. The postoperative AHI in the UAS group was significantly lower. The pre and postoperative Epworth sleepiness scores (ESS) were 12 and 6 in both the traditional sleep surgery and UAS groups. Subgroup analysis evaluated those patients undergoing single level palate and multilevel palate and tongue base traditional sleep surgeries. The UAS group had a significantly lower postoperive AHI than both traditional sleep surgery subgroups. The UAS group had a higher percentage of patients reaching surgical success, defined as a postoperative AHI <20 with a 50% reduction from preoperative severity. CONCLUSION: UAS offers significantly better control of AHI severity than traditional sleep surgery. Quality life improvements were similar between groups.

Evaluation of Surgical Learning Curve Effect on Obstructive Sleep Apnea Outcomes in Upper Airway Stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: An increasing number of facilities offer Upper Airway Stimulation (UAS) with varying levels of experience. The goal was to quantify whether a surgical learning curve exists in operative or sleep outcomes in UAS. METHODS: International multi-center retrospective review of the ADHERE registry, a prospective international multi-center study collecting UAS outcomes. ADHERE registry centers with at least 20 implants and outcomes data through at least 6-month follow-up were reviewed. Cases were divided into two groups based on implant order (the first 10 or second 10 consecutive implants at a given site). Group differences were assessed using Mann-Whitney U-tests, Chi-squared tests, or Fisher's Exact tests, as appropriate. A Mann-Kendall trend test was used to detect if there was a monotonic trend in operative time. Sleep outcome equivalence between experience groups was assessed using the two one-sided tests approach. RESULTS: Thirteen facilities met inclusion criteria, contributing 260 patients. Complication rates did not significantly differ between groups (P = .808). Operative time exhibited a significant downward trend (P < .001), with the median operative time dropping from 150 minutes for the first 10 implants to 134 minutes for the subsequent 10 implants. The decrease in AHI from baseline to 12-month follow-up was equivalent between the first and second ten (22.8 vs 21.2 events/hour, respectively, P < .001). Similarly, the first and second ten groups had equivalent ESS decreases at 6 months (2.0 vs 2.0, respectively, P < .001). ESS outcomes remained equivalent for those with data through 12-months. CONCLUSIONS: Across the centers' first 20 implants, an approximately 11% reduction operative time was identified, however, no learning curve effect was seen for 6-month or 12-month AHI or ESS over the first twenty implants. Ongoing monitoring through the ADHERE registry will help measure the impact of evolving provider and patient specific characteristics as the number of implant centers increases.

Die Stimulation des Nervus hypoglossus in der Behandlung der obstruktiven Schlafapnoe ­ Aktualisiertes Positionspapier der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Schlafmedizin der DGHNO-KHC.

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea - Updated position paper of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery. Since the first statement of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) is meanwhile an established treatment option for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). There are three HNS systems available in Germany which differ in their technical details of the underlying comparable basic principle. For the unilateral HNS with respiratory sensing, several comparative studies, high-volume register analysis and long-term reports exist. The continuous HNS without respiratory sensing does not require a sleep endoscopy for indication. For the bilateral continuous HNS as the single partially implantable device, a feasibility study exists. For indication, the assessment of positive airway pressure failure by sleep medicine is crucial, and the decision for HNS should be made in discussion of other treatment options for at least moderate OSA. The implantation center holds primarily responsibility among the interdisciplinary sleep team and is primary contact for the patient in problems. This depicts why structural processes are required to secure outcome quality and minimize complications. The aftercare of HNS patients can be provided interdisciplinary and by different medical institutions whereat minimal reporting standards to document outcome and usage are recommended.

Long-term changes of stimulation intensities in hypoglossal nerve stimulation.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) is a novel therapy in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Previous studies have focused on the effectiveness of HNS, but there are no studies specifically investigating the long-term changes of the stimulation intensities in HNS. Increasing stimulation intensity requirements have been reported in the past in other peripheral nerve stimulation therapies. The aim of this study was to investigate the development of stimulation intensities over the observation period of 4 years. METHODS: All patients who were implanted with an HNS system since December 2013 and maintained a bipolar configuration over the observation period were included. Sensation threshold (ST), functional threshold, the titrated stimulation intensity (SI), and the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients were enrolled (sex: 69 men, 13 women, age: 60 ± 11 years, body mass index: 29. 8 ± 4.0 kg/m²). Two months after surgery, the median ST was 0.8 ± 0.5 V. During the observation period of 48 months, no significant change of ST was observed. The median ST was 1.0 ± 0.4 V (P = 0.93) at 48 months. Similar results were found for functional threshold and the titrated stimulation intensity. There was a significant reduction of the baseline median AHI when compared with the median AHI at 1, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after surgery (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The stimulation intensities in HNS show no significant changes over 4 years. Despite the constant stimulation intensity, AHI was significantly reduced. This indicates that the stimulation threshold of the hypoglossal nerve does not change over time with this therapy.

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation therapy does not alter tongue protrusion strength and fatigability in obstructive sleep apnea.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) is an effective surgical alternative for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). HNS therapy relies on the stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve to open the upper airways. This stimulation could lead to alterations in tongue strength and fatigability, which could alter treatment outcome over time. The aim of the study was to investigate whether HNS alters tongue strength and fatigability. METHODS: Tongue protrusion strength (peak pressure in kPa) and fatigability (time to task failure during 50% of peak pressure contraction) were measured with a pressure transducer at least 2 months after HNS implantation (n = 30). These results were compared to a group of patients with OSA (n = 38) and a non-OSA control group (n = 35). RESULTS: Median tongue protrusion strength was lower (54.7 [43.8, 63.0] versus 60.7 [53.7, 66.0] kPa, P = .013) and fatigue occurred more quickly (21.3 [17.4, 26.3] versus 26.0 [19.3, 31.3] seconds, P = .017) in the patients with OSA compared to the non-OSA control group. In multiple regression analysis, age was a significant factor for tongue strength and diagnosis of OSA for tongue fatigability. Tongue strength and fatigability did not differ between patients with OSA with conservative therapy or observation versus after HNS implantation (51.8 [41.3, 63.4] versus 56.3 [45.0, 62.3] kPa, P = .502; 20.8 [16.3, 26.2] versus 21.8 [18.3, 26.8] seconds, P = .418). CONCLUSIONS: Tongue strength decreases with age. Tongue fatigability is more pronounced in people with OSA. However, approximately 1.5 years of HNS therapy on average does not alter tongue strength or fatigability compared to an OSA control group. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Title: Change in Tongue Strength and Fatigue After Upper Airway Stimulation Therapy; Identifier: NCT03980158.

Results of the ADHERE upper airway stimulation registry and predictors of therapy efficacy.

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: The ADHERE Registry is a multicenter prospective observational study following outcomes of upper airway stimulation (UAS) therapy in patients who have failed continuous positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The aim of this registry and purpose of this article were to examine the outcomes of patients receiving UAS for treatment of OSA. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort Study. METHODS: Demographic and sleep study data collection occurred at baseline, implantation visit, post-titration (6 months), and final visit (12 months). Patient and physician reported outcomes were also collected. Post hoc univariate and multivariate analysis was used to identify predictors of therapy response, defined as ≥50% decrease in Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) and AHI ≤20 at the 12-month visit. RESULTS: The registry has enrolled 1,017 patients from October 2016 through February 2019. Thus far, 640 patients have completed their 6-month follow-up and 382 have completed the 12-month follow-up. After 12 months, median AHI was reduced from 32.8 (interquartile range [IQR], 23.6-45.0) to 9.5 (IQR, 4.0-18.5); mean, 35.8 ± 15.4 to 14.2 ± 15.0, P < .0001. Epworth Sleepiness Scale was similarly improved from 11.0 (IQR, 7-16) to 7.0 (IQR, 4-11); mean, 11.4 ± 5.6 to 7.2 ± 4.8, P < .0001. Therapy usage was 5.6 ± 2.1 hours per night after 12 months. In a multivariate model, only female sex and lower baseline body mass index remained as significant predictors of therapy response. CONCLUSIONS: Across a multi-institutional study, UAS therapy continues to show significant improvement in subjective and objective OSA outcomes. This analysis shows that the therapy effect is durable and adherence is high. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Laryngoscope, 130:1333-1338, 2020.

Long-term follow-up of the German post-market study for upper airway stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea.

PURPOSE: Upper airway stimulation (UAS) is an effective treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in positive airway pressure (PAP) failure. Most reports have presented short-term data, so long-term safety and efficacy reports are rare. The German post-market study (G-PMS) has followed approximately 60 patients from three implanting centers for several years. METHODS: Patients with OSA and PAP failure qualified for the G-PMS by the absence of obesity class 2 an AHI between 15 and 65 events/h and absence of complete concentric collapse at the velum during drug-induced sleep endoscopy. Optional 2- and 3-year follow-ups after implantation were collected during routine clinical practice. We measured respiratory parameters such as apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and oxygen desaturation index (ODI) and daytime sleepiness using the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) in a per protocol analysis. Usage was calculated from device-downloaded reports. Device-related complications were documented. RESULTS: Of the 60 original patients, 41 returned for 2-year follow-up, and 38 for 3 years. About 76% at 2 years and 68% at 3 years met the criterion of therapy success defined as an AHI below 15/h. The median AHI was reduced from 28.6/h (baseline) to 9.0/h (2 years) and 10.0/h (3 years); whereas median ODI decreased from 27.0 to 6.3/h (2 years), and 8.3/h (3 years). Median ESS improved from baseline 13 points to 4 (2 years) and 6 (3 years). Usage was stable at approximately 45 h per week at 2 and 3 years. Serious device-related adverse events were rare, with two-device explantation between 12 to 36 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The German multi-center long-term outcomes compare favorably with previously published studies. Respiratory and sleepiness efficacy outcomes were sustained over 2 and 3 years, with a favorable safety profile, supporting the safety and efficacy of a chronic implantable therapy.

Previous Surgery and Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether previous palate or hypopharyngeal surgery was associated with efficacy of treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with hypoglossal nerve stimulation. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort (retrospective and prospective). SETTING: Eleven academic medical centers. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Adults treated with hypoglossal nerve stimulation were enrolled in the ADHERE Registry. Outcomes were defined by the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), in 3 ways: change in the AHI and 2 definitions of therapy response requiring ≥50% reduction in the AHI to a level <20 events/h (Response20) or 15 events/h (Response15). Previous palate and hypopharyngeal (tongue, epiglottis, or maxillofacial) procedures were documented. Linear and logistic regression examined the association between previous palate or hypopharyngeal surgery and outcomes, with adjustment for age, sex, and body mass index. RESULTS: The majority (73%, 217 of 299) had no previous palate or hypopharyngeal surgery, while 25% and 9% had previous palate or hypopharyngeal surgery, respectively, including 6% with previous palate and hypopharyngeal surgery. Baseline AHI (36.0 ± 15.6 events/h) decreased to 12.0 ± 13.3 at therapy titration (P < .001) and 11.4 ± 12.6 at final follow-up (P < .001). Any previous surgery, previous palate surgery, and previous hypopharyngeal surgery were not clearly associated with treatment response; for example, any previous surgery was associated with a 0.69 (95% CI: 0.37, 1.27) odds of response (Response20 measure) at therapy titration and a 0.55 (95% CI: 0.22, 1.34) odds of response (Response20 measure) at final follow-up. CONCLUSION: Previous upper airway surgery was not clearly associated with efficacy of hypoglossal nerve stimulation.

Post-approval upper airway stimulation predictors of treatment effectiveness in the ADHERE registry.

Upper airway stimulation (UAS) has been shown to reduce severity of obstructive sleep apnoea. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of UAS therapy response in an international multicentre registry.Patients who underwent UAS implantation in the United States and Germany were enrolled in an observational registry. Data collected included patient characteristics, apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI), Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), objective adherence, adverse events and patient satisfaction measures. Post hoc univariate and multiple logistic regression were performed to evaluate factors associated with treatment success.Between October 2016 and January 2018, 508 participants were enrolled from 14 centres. Median AHI was reduced from 34 to 7 events·h-1, median ESS reduced from 12 to 7 from baseline to final visit at 12-month post-implant. In post hoc analyses, for each 1-year increase in age, there was a 4% increase in odds of treatment success. For each 1-unit increase in body mass index (BMI), there was 9% reduced odds of treatment success. In the multivariable model, age persisted in serving as statistically significant predictor of treatment success.In a large multicentre international registry, UAS is an effective treatment option with high patient satisfaction and low adverse events. Increasing age and reduced BMI are predictors of treatment response.

Patient experience with upper airway stimulation in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

OBJECTIVE: Selective upper airway stimulation (sUAS) is a new treatment modality for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) failure. The aim of this study was to analyze therapy adherence and to structure patient experience reports. METHODS: Patients from two German implantation centers were included. Besides demographic and OSA characteristics of that cohort, patients answered a questionnaire on subjective sensation of the stimulation, use of different functions, side effects, and an inventory for the description of the attitude towards sUAS. The use of the sUAS was evaluated as a read-out of the implanted system. RESULTS: The overall apnea-hypopnea-index (AHI) of that 102 assessed patients reduced from initially 32.8/h to 12.6/h at the last available assessment. The responder rate was 75%. There was an objective therapy usage of 5.7 h and subjective reports of 6.8 nights per week. The attitude resulted in strong agreement towards the statement "UAS reduces the problems caused by my sleep apnea". Information on sensing the stimulation and usage habits could be gathered such as that stimulation is only sensed by 67.9% of the patients upon waking in the morning and that 73.6% of the patients do not change the voltage in general. CONCLUSION: This investigation on the sUAS therapy revealed a high adherence to the therapy. The AHI or daytime sleepiness do not have obvious influence on adherence. Patients expressed a positive attitude towards sUAS. These patient reports upon stimulation experiences are of great help to consult candidates for sUAS in future.

Evaluation of body position in upper airway stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea-is continuous voltage sufficient enough?

PURPOSE: The definition of positional obstructive sleep apnea (POSA) is widely accepted as a difference of 50% or more in AHI between supine and non-supine position. Upper airway stimulation (UAS) is an effective treatment for OSA but the implant delivers a single voltage over sleep period without consideration of body position. Clinical practice suggests different outcomes for OSA in supine position under UAS treatment. METHODS: Outcomes of 44 patients were analyzed 12 months after implantation in a two-center, prospective consecutive trial in a university hospital setting. Total night and supine AHI were evaluated and the ratio of time spent in supine was considered. Correlation between the classic and the modified definition of POSA and treatment response were evaluated. RESULTS: The time ratio spent in supine position did not differ before implantation and after 12 months. Total and supine AHI were reduced with the use of UAS therapy (p < 0.001) but both the baseline and final supine AHI were higher than total night AHI. Considering POSA definition as a ratio of supine to non-supine AHI, there was no clear cutoff for defining responders neither with nor without the additional component of time in supine position. CONCLUSIONS: The OSA reduction is strong for the total AHI and supine AHI. Nonetheless, here, there is no cutoff for defining POSA as critical for UAS therapy response. Therefore, there is no evidence for excluding POSA patients from UAS in general. Future technology improvement should take body position and adaptive voltage into account.