The evolving role of investigative toxicology in the pharmaceutical industry.

For decades, preclinical toxicology was essentially a descriptive discipline in which treatment-related effects were carefully reported and used as a basis to calculate safety margins for drug candidates. In recent years, however, technological advances have increasingly enabled researchers to gain insights into toxicity mechanisms, supporting greater understanding of species relevance and translatability to humans, prediction of safety events, mitigation of side effects and development of safety biomarkers. Consequently, investigative (or mechanistic) toxicology has been gaining momentum and is now a key capability in the pharmaceutical industry. Here, we provide an overview of the current status of the field using case studies and discuss the potential impact of ongoing technological developments, based on a survey of investigative toxicologists from 14 European-based medium-sized to large pharmaceutical companies.

Liver microphysiological systems development guidelines for safety risk assessment in the pharmaceutical industry.

The liver is critical to consider during drug development because of its central role in the handling of xenobiotics, a process which often leads to localized and/or downstream tissue injury. Our ability to predict human clinical safety outcomes with animal testing is limited due to species differences in drug metabolism and disposition, while traditional human in vitro liver models often lack the necessary in vivo physiological fidelity. To address this, increasing numbers of liver microphysiological systems (MPS) are being developed, however the inconsistency in their optimization and characterization often leads to models that do not possess critical levels of baseline performance that is required for many pharmaceutical industry applications. Herein we provide a guidance on best approaches to benchmark liver MPS based on 3 stages of characterization that includes key performance metrics and a 20 compound safety test set. Additionally, we give an overview of frequently used liver injury safety assays, describe the ideal MPS model, and provide a perspective on currently best suited MPS contexts of use. This pharmaceutical industry guidance has been written to help MPS developers and end users identify what could be the most valuable models for safety risk assessment.

Optimizing drug discovery by Investigative Toxicology: Current and future trends.

Investigative Toxicology describes the de-risking and mechanistic elucidation of toxicities, supporting early safety decisions in the pharmaceutical industry. Recently, Investigative Toxicology has contributed to a shift in pharmaceutical toxicology, from a descriptive to an evidence-based, mechanistic discipline. This was triggered by high costs and low throughput of Good Laboratory Practice in vivo studies, and increasing demands for adhering to the 3R (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement) principles of animal welfare. Outside the boundaries of regulatory toxicology, Investigative Toxicology has the flexibility to embrace new technologies, enhancing translational steps from in silico, in vitro to in vivo mechanistic understanding to eventually predict human response. One major goal of Investigative Toxicology is improving preclinical decisions, which coincides with the concept of animal-free safety testing. Currently, compounds under preclinical development are being discarded due to the use of inappropriate animal models. Progress in Investigative Toxicology could lead to humanized in vitro test systems and the development of medicines less reliant on animal tests. To advance this field a group of 14 European-based leaders from the pharmaceutical industry founded the Investigative Toxicology Leaders Forum (ITLF), an open, non-exclusive and pre-competitive group that shares knowledge and experience. The ITLF collaborated with the Centre for Alternatives to Animal Testing Europe (CAAT-Europe) to organize an "Investigative Toxicology Think-Tank", which aimed to enhance the interaction with experts from academia and regulatory bodies in the field. Summarizing the topics and discussion of the workshop, this article highlights Investigative Toxicology's position by identifying key challenges and perspectives.

Evaluation of novel acute urinary rat kidney toxicity biomarker for subacute toxicity studies in preclinical trials.

Novel urinary protein biomarkers for the detection of acute renal damage, recently accepted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, European Medicines Agency, and Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (Japan), now have to be validated in practice. Limited data regarding the performance of these acute markers after subacute or subchronic treatment are publicly available. To increase the area of applicability of these markers, it is important to evaluate the ability to detect them after 28 days of treatment or even longer. Wistar rats were treated with three doses of cisplatin, vancomycin, or puromycin to induce renal damage. Twelve candidate proteins were measured by Luminex xMAP-based WideScreen assays, MesoScale Discovery-based MULTI-SPOT technology, or RENA-strip dipstick assay after 28 days. Treatment with all three model compounds resulted in a dose-dependent increase in urinary biomarkers, specific for the observed areas within the nephron, determined histopathologically. The most promising biomarkers in this study were NGAL, Kim-1, osteopontin, clusterin, RPA-1, and GSTYb1, detected by multiplexing technologies. The RENA-strip dipstick assay delivered good diagnostic results for vancomycin-treated but not for cisplatin- or puromycin-treated rats. Taken together, the data show that these new biomarkers are robust and measurable for longer term studies to predict different types of kidney toxicities.

Preclinical perspective of urinary biomarkers for the detection of nephrotoxicity: what we know and what we need to know.

The assessment of kidney damage is a challenge and must incorporate assessment of the functional capacity of the kidney, as well as a comprehensive understanding of the kidney's role. Multiple parameters have been used for many years to measure renal functionality to assess renal damage. It is astonishing that, beside histopathology, the most common traditional parameters are serum based. However, urine is also used to obtain additional information regarding the health status of the kidneys. Since 2008, several novel urinary protein biomarkers have been qualified by the US FDA and the European Medicines Agency in conjunction with the Predictive Safety Testing Consortium in a specially developed qualification process. Subsequently, the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency accepted the qualification of these seven urinary biomarkers. This review will give an overview of the state-of-the-art detection based on urinary biomarkers, which will enhance toxicological research in the future. In addition, the qualification process that leads to acceptance of these biomarkers will be described because of its uniqueness and importance for the field of biomarker research.