RESUMEN
AIM: The aim of this paper was to explore the concept of expertise in nursing from the perspective of how it relates to current driving forces in health care in which it discusses the potential barriers to acceptance of nursing expertise in a climate in which quantification of value and cost containment run high on agendas. BACKGROUND: Expert nursing practice can be argued to be central to high quality, holistic, individualized patient care. However, changes in government policy which have led to the inception of comprehensive guidelines or protocols of care are in danger of relegating the 'expert nurse' to being an icon of the past. Indeed, it could be argued that expert nurses are an expensive commodity within the nursing workforce. Consequently, with this change to the use of clinical guidelines, it calls into question how expert nursing practice will develop within this framework of care. METHOD: The article critically reviews the evidence related to the role of the Expert Nurse in an attempt to identify the key concepts and ideas, and how the inception of care protocols has implications for their role. CONCLUSION: Nursing expertise which focuses on the provision of individualized, holistic care and is based largely on intuitive decision making cannot, should not be reduced to being articulated in positivist terms. However, the dominant power and decision-making focus in health care means that nurses must be confident in articulating the value of a concept which may be outside the scope of knowledge of those with whom they are debating. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The principles of abduction or fuzzy logic may be useful in assisting nurses to explain in terms which others can comprehend, the value of nursing expertise.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Política de Salud , Enfermería/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Lógica Difusa , Humanos , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Intuición , Enfermería/organización & administración , Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
This paper explores the concept of expertise in intensive care nursing practice from the perspective of its relationship to the current driving forces in healthcare. It discusses the potential barriers to acceptance of nursing expertise in a climate in which quantification of value and cost containment run high on agendas. It argues that nursing expertise which focuses on the provision of individualised, holistic care and which is based largely on intuitive decision-making cannot and should not be reduced to being articulated in positivist terms. The principles of abduction or fuzzy logic, derived from computer science, may be useful in assisting nurses to explain in terms, which others can comprehend, the value of nursing expertise.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/normas , Cuidados Críticos/organización & administración , Rol de la Enfermera , Arte , Control de Costos , Lógica Difusa , Humanos , Modelos de Enfermería , Investigación en Evaluación de Enfermería , Proceso de Enfermería , Poder Psicológico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Autonomía Profesional , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Ciencia , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
Respecting patient autonomy is a central part of the Royal College of Nursing's definition of nursing (RCN, 2003). Although autonomy is a fundamental ethical principle in health care, it stands alongside the principles of beneficence, non-maleficence and justice (Wilmot, 2003), and these principles may be interpreted differently by individuals and professional groups. In seeking to promote patient autonomy, it is therefore necessary for nurses to consider how these principles interlink, and to understand the potentially differing interpretations that they may encounter in practice. This article sets out to address these issues and suggests that facilitating patient autonomy includes engaging in debates which include uncertainties, considering the resource implications of patient autonomy and the responsibilities that patients have themselves. It also identifies that nurses who aim to promote patient autonomy and holistic decision making need to be able to facilitate discussion that may include questioning the dominant biomedical view of health. This will be problematic if nurses do not themselves feel empowered or autonomous.