A comprehensive approach to complementary and alternative medicine usage among patients from a vascular department.

INTRODUCTION: Use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies had been described in patients with disabling, chronic and painful conditions; these characteristics define the majority of vascular surgery (VS) entities. A lack of disclosure about CAM use from patients has been universally cited and may impact effective patient-doctor communication. Our primary objective was to describe CAM use, modalities, perceived benefits, safety, and associated factors among adult patients attending a VS outpatient clinic; we additionally explored patient's attitudes about CAM disclosure with their primary vascular surgeon. METHODS: This cross-sectional study invited 223 consecutive outpatients to an interview where the ICAM-Q (International Complementary and Alternative Medicine Questionnaire) and the PDRQ-9 (Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire-9 items) were applied. In addition, sociodemographics, vascular disease and treatment-related information, comorbidity, and disease severity characteristics were obtained. Appropriated statistics was used; multiple logistic regression analysis identified factors associated to CAM use. All statistical tests were two-sided, and a p value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. IRB approval was obtained. RESULTS: Patients recruited were primary females (69%) and had a median age of 65 years (54-75). Most frequent vascular diagnoses were chronic venous insufficiency (36.2%) and peripheral artery disease (26%). There were 104 (46.6%) patients who referred CAM use, primarily self-helped practices (96%), and use of herbal, vitamins, or homeopathic medicines (23.7%). Overall, the majority of the patients perceived CAM modalities helpful and 94.6% denied any adverse event. Female sex (OR: 1.768, 95% CI: 0.997-3.135, p = 0.051) and hospitalization during the previous year (OR: 3.173, 95% CI: 1.492-6.748, p = 0.003) were associated to CAM use. The majority of the patients (77%) agreed about CAM disclosure with their primary vascular surgeon; meanwhile, among CAM users, up to 54.9% did not disclose it, and their main reasons were "Doctor didn't ask" (32%) and "I consider it unnecessary" (16%). The patient-doctor relationship was rated by the patients with high scores. CONCLUSIONS: CAM use is frequent and perceived as safe and beneficial among VS outpatients; nonetheless, patients do not disclose CAM use with their primary vascular surgeons, and a wide range of reasons are given by the patients that prevent effective and open communication.

Takayasu's Arteritis from the Patients' Perspectives: Measuring the Pulse to the Patient-Reported Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Patients with Takayasu's arteritis (TA) experience important changes in lifestyle, quality of life, and functional status due to ischemic symptoms or treatment toxicity. PURPOSE: To describe the clinical characteristics and the patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as quality of life, disability, fatigue, and perception/impact of the disease in Mexican patients with TA. METHODS: Cross-sectional study including patients with established diagnosis of TA recruited at a tertiary care center. Demographics, comorbidities, clinical characteristics, laboratory, imaging, and treatment were retrieved. Disease activity (the Indian Takayasu Clinical Activity Score (ITAS) 2010), damage (Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI)), quality of life (Short Form 36 (SF-36)), disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)), fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20), and patient's disease perceptions were assessed. RESULTS: Fifteen women were included, with a median age of 41 years (interquartile range (IQR) 30-45) and disease duration of 108 months (IQR 55-197). Median ITAS 2010 and VDI scores were 0 (IQR 0-2) and 3 points (IQR 2-6), respectively. Mean SF-36 score was 71.38 ± 13.39, with mean physical and mental component summaries of 66.52 ± 13.37 and 76.24 ± 14.89, respectively. HAQ-DI mean score was 0.48 ± 0.62, being grip the most affected domain. Among fatigue subscales, the higher scores were present in the physical fatigue (16.3 ± 5.8). Correlations between the HAQ-DI and the VDI score (r = 0.64, P = 0.03); between the general fatigue, score, and disease duration (r = -0.71, P = 0.01); and between the SF-36 total score and the HAQ-DI (r = -0.87, P = 0.0004) were found. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to identify disease-specific outcomes of interest to the patients to develop tools that assess them with a holistic approach.

Managing central venous access during a health care crisis.

OBJECTIVE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, central venous access line teams were implemented at many hospitals throughout the world to provide access for critically ill patients. The objective of this study was to describe the structure, practice patterns, and outcomes of these vascular access teams during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, self-reported study of central venous access line teams in hospitals afflicted with the COVID-19 pandemic. To participate in the study, hospitals were required to meet one of the following criteria: development of a formal plan for a central venous access line team during the pandemic; implementation of a central venous access line team during the pandemic; placement of central venous access by a designated practice group during the pandemic as part of routine clinical practice; or management of an iatrogenic complication related to central venous access in a patient with COVID-19. RESULTS: Participants from 60 hospitals in 13 countries contributed data to the study. Central venous line teams were most commonly composed of vascular surgery and general surgery attending physicians and trainees. Twenty sites had 2657 lines placed by their central venous access line team or designated practice group. During that time, there were 11 (0.4%) iatrogenic complications associated with central venous access procedures performed by the line team or group at those 20 sites. Triple lumen catheters, Cordis (Santa Clara, Calif) catheters, and nontunneled hemodialysis catheters were the most common types of central venous lines placed by the teams. Eight (14%) sites reported experience in placing central venous lines in prone, ventilated patients with COVID-19. A dedicated line cart was used by 35 (59%) of the hospitals. Less than 50% (24 [41%]) of the participating sites reported managing thrombosed central lines in COVID-19 patients. Twenty-three of the sites managed 48 iatrogenic complications in patients with COVID-19 (including complications caused by providers outside of the line team or designated practice group). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a dedicated central venous access line team during a pandemic or other health care crisis is a way by which physicians trained in central venous access can contribute their expertise to a stressed health care system. A line team composed of physicians with vascular skill sets provides relief to resource-constrained intensive care unit, ward, and emergency medicine teams with a low rate of iatrogenic complications relative to historical reports. We recommend that a plan for central venous access line team implementation be in place for future health care crises.

[Extracolonic manifestation as first sign of colorectal carcinoma. Report of 2 cases]. / Manifestación extracolónica como primera evidencia de carcinoma colorrectal. Informe de dos casos.

INTRODUCTION: In Mexico, colorectal cancer is the second most common malignant tumor of digestive tract; incidence is proportional to patient age. At time of diagnosis, 20% of patients can be found with metastases, liver and lung the organs affected most frequently. OBJECTIVE: To present two young patients, whose primary complaints were atypical extracolonic symptoms of colorectal cancer. CASE DESCRIPTION: CASE 1: A 44-year-old female who presented with left pleural effusion, with growth in culture positive for enterobacterias. Barium enema showed tumor in splenic flexure. Surgical resection was performed including, left kidney, spleen, tail of pancreas, and fourth portion of duodenum. Colo-pleural fistula was repaired with primary closure. The pathology report noted locally advanced adenocarcinoma of colon (T4 N0 M0). CASE 2: A 22-year-old female, who presented with a 30 day history of neurologic complaints. Computer tomography of head and MRI of brain identified a mass at level of cerebellum; specimen biopsy report was consistent with metastasis adenocarcinoma. Colonoscopy found a tumor located 12 cm from anal verge. The patient underwent sigmoid resection. Pathology confirmed the presence of moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma and 14/22 positive nodes (T3, N2, M1). CONCLUSION: The most common sites of metastases secondary to colorectal cancer are liver and lung, up to 30% at diagnosis, and usually are asymptomatic. We reported two patients whose first evidence of disease were atypical symptoms related to unusual sites of colorectal cancer extension.