Thalamic volume, resting-state activity, and their association with the efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy.

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the most effective antidepressant treatment. Biological predictors of clinical outcome to ECT are valuable. We aimed to examine multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data that correlates to the efficacy of ECT. Structural and resting-state functional MRI data were acquired from 46 individuals (25 depressed individuals who received ECT, and 21 healthy controls). Whole-brain grey matter volume (GMV) and fractional amplitude of low frequency fluctuations (fALFF) were investigated to identify brain regions associated with post-ECT Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) total scores. GMV and fALFF values were compared with those in healthy controls using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Remission was defined by HAM-D ≤7. A multiple regression analysis revealed that pretreatment smaller GMV in the left thalamus was associated with worse response to ECT (i.e. higher post-ECT HAM-D). Pretreatment higher fALFF in the right anterior insula, and lower fALFF in the left thalamus and the cerebellum were associated with worse outcomes. The left thalamus was identified in both GMV and fALFF analyses. Nonremitters showed significantly smaller thalamic GMV compared to remitters and controls. We found that pretreatment thalamic volume and resting-state activity were associated with the efficacy of ECT. Our results highlight the importance of the thalamus as a possible biological predictor and its role in the underlying mechanisms of ECT action.

Resilience and spirituality in patients with depression and their family members: A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: The degree and quality of resilience in patients with depression have never been investigated in the context of remission status, spirituality/religiosity, and family members' resilience levels, which was addressed in this study. METHODS: This cross-sectional study recruited Japanese outpatients with depressive disorder according to ICD-10 and cohabitant family members who were free from psychiatric diagnoses. Resilience was assessed using the 25-item Resilience Scale (RS). Other assessments included the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS); the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT) and Kasen et al.'s (2012) scale for spirituality/religiosity; and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES). RESULTS: One hundred outpatients with depression (mean±SD age, 50.8±14.5years; 44 men; MADRS total score 9.8±9.0) and 36 healthy family members (mean±SD age, 56.5±15.0years; 18 men) were included. Symptom severity, attendance at religious/spiritual services, and self-esteem were significantly associated with RS scores in the patient group. RS total scores were significantly higher in remitted patients compared to non-remitted patients (mean±SD, 112.3±17.1 vs. 84.8±27.7, p<0.001). No correlation was found in RS total scores between patients and their family members (p=0.265), regardless of patients' remission status. CONCLUSIONS: Resilience may be influenced by individual characteristics rather than familial environment; furthermore, self-esteem or spirituality/religiosity may represent reinforcing elements. While caution is necessary in extrapolating these findings to other patient populations, our results suggest that resilience may be considered a state marker in depression.