RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has risen substantially in recent decades, while the average 5-year survival remains only ~20%. Disease stage and treatment are the strongest prognostic factors. The role of lifestyle factors in relation to survival remains uncertain, with a handful of studies to date investigating associations with obesity, smoking, physical activity, diet, or medications. METHODS: This study included patients diagnosed with primary adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction, or cardia (N = 371) at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2003 and 2019. Leveraging extensive data abstracted from electronic medical records, epidemiologic questionnaires, and a tumor registry, we analyzed clinical, behavioral, and environmental exposures and evaluated stage-specific associations with survival. Survival distributions were visualized using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for age, sex, stage, treatment, and comorbidities were used to estimate the association between each exposure and all-cause or cancer-specific mortality. RESULTS: Among patients presenting with localized/regional tumors (stages I-III), current smoking was associated with increased overall mortality risk (HR = 2.5 [1.42-4.53], p = 0.002), while current physical activity was linked to reduced risk (HR = 0.58 [0.35-0.96], p = 0.035). Among patients with stage IV disease, individuals reporting pre-diagnostic use of statins (HR = 0.62 [0.42-0.92], p = 0.018) or NSAIDs (HR = 0.61 [0.42-0.91], p = 0.016) had improved overall survival. Exploratory analyses suggested that high pre-diagnostic dietary consumption of broccoli, carrots, and fiber correlated with prolonged overall survival in patients with localized/regional disease. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that lifestyle exposures may be differentially associated with EAC survival based on disease stage. Future investigation of larger, diverse patient cohorts is essential to validate these findings. Our results may help inform the development of lifestyle-based interventions to improve EAC prognosis and quality of life.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Isolated limb infusion (ILI) is a minimally invasive approach for treating in-transit extremity melanoma, with only two US single-center studies reported. Establishing response and toxicity to ILI as compared with hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion is important for optimizing future regional chemotherapeutic strategies in melanoma. STUDY DESIGN: Patient characteristics and procedural variables were collected retrospectively from 162 ILIs performed at 8 institutions (2001 to 2008) and compared using chi-square and Student's t-test. ILIs were performed for 30 minutes in patients with in-transit melanoma. Melphalan dose was corrected for ideal body weight (IBW) in 42% (n = 68) of procedures. Response was determined at 3 months by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; toxicity was assessed using the Wieberdink Limb Toxicity Scale. RESULTS: In 128 evaluable patients, complete response rate was 31%, partial response rate was 33%, and there was no response in 36% of patients. For all patients (n = 162), 36% had Wieberdink toxicity grade >or=3 with one toxicity-related amputation. On multivariate analysis, smaller limb volumes were associated with better overall response (p = 0.021). Use of papaverine in the circuit to achieve cutaneous vasodilation was associated with better response (p < 0.001) but higher risk of grade >or=3 toxicity (p = 0.001). Correction of melphalan dose for ideal body weight did not alter complete response (p = 0.345), but did lead to marked reduction in toxicity (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the first multi-institutional analysis of ILI, a complete response rate of 31% was achieved with acceptable toxicity demonstrating this procedure to be a reasonable alternative to hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion in the management of advanced extremity melanoma.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional/métodos , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Melfalán/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Dactinomicina/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Extremidades , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertermia Inducida , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Papaverina/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To define the optimal treatment of patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA) of the anal margin. METHODS: Nineteen patients treated with curative intent by radiotherapy (RT) alone or combined with adjuvant chemotherapy (CTX) between 1979 and June 2000 were analyzed. The pertinent literature was reviewed and discussed as it related to our experience. RESULTS: Local control after RT or RT and CTX was observed in all 19 patients (100%). One T1 patient developed inguinal lymph node metastases and subsequently died secondary to regional and distant disease. This patient did not receive elective inguinal node RT; the lymph nodes of the other 18 patients in this analysis were irradiated. Four patients died of intercurrent disease at 25, 29, 37, and 113 months after RT, respectively. The remaining 14 patients were alive and disease-free from 52 to 143 months after treatment. No patient suffered a severe complication or required a diverting colostomy or an abdominoperineal resection (APR) after treatment. Review of the literature reveals that the probability of cure is similar after RT alone or combined with CTX compared with surgery. Therefore, the choice of treatment depends on the anticipated functional result. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SCCA of the anal margin have a high likelihood of cure with sphincter preservation after RT or RT and CTX. Patients with well to moderately differentiated T1 tumors may undergo excision if it can be accomplished without compromising the sphincter. The remainder are treated with RT. Adjuvant CTX is indicated for those with T3-T4 tumors and/or involved regional nodes.