An In Vitro Perspective on What Individual Antimicrobials Add to Mycobacterium avium Complex Therapies.

For Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD), current treatment regimens yield low cure rates. To obtain an evidence-based combination therapy, we assessed the in vitro activity of six drugs, namely, clarithromycin (CLR), rifampin (RIF), ethambutol (EMB), amikacin (AMK), clofazimine (CLO), and minocycline (MIN), alone and in combination, against Mycobacterium avium and studied the contributions of individual antibiotics to efficacy. The MICs of all antibiotics against M. avium ATCC 700898 were determined by broth microdilution. We performed kinetic time-kill assays of all single drugs and clinically relevant two-, three-, four-, and five-drug combinations against M. avium. Pharmacodynamic interactions of these combinations were assessed using area under the time-kill curve-derived effect size and Bliss independence. Adding a second drug yielded an average increase of the effect size (E) of 18.7% ± 32.9%, although antagonism was seen in some combinations. Adding a third drug showed a smaller increase in effect size (+12.2% ± 11.5%). The RIF-CLO-CLR (E of 102 log10 CFU/ml · day), RIF-AMK-CLR (E of 101 log10 CFU/ml · day), and AMK-MIN-EMB (E of 97.8 log10 CFU/ml · day) regimens proved more active than the recommended RIF-EMB-CLR regimen (E of 89.1 log10 CFU/ml · day). The addition of a fourth drug had little impact on effect size (+4.54% ± 3.08%). In vitro, several two- and three-drug regimens are as effective as the currently recommended regimen for MAC-PD. Adding a fourth drug to any regimen had little additional effect. In vitro, the most promising regimen would be RIF-AMK-macrolide or RIF-CLO-macrolide.

Is there a role for tedizolid in the treatment of non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease?

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary infections caused by non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are hard to treat and have low cure rates despite intensive multidrug therapy. OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of tedizolid, a new oxazolidinone, for the treatment of Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium abscessus. METHODS: We determined MICs of tedizolid for 113 isolates of NTM. Synergy with key antimycobacterial drugs was assessed using the chequerboard method and calculation of the FIC index (FICI). We performed time-kill kinetics assays of tedizolid alone and combined with amikacin for M. abscessus and with ethambutol for M. avium. Human macrophages were infected with M. abscessus and M. avium and subsequently treated with tedizolid; intracellular and extracellular cfu were quantified over time. RESULTS: NTM isolates generally had a lower MIC of tedizolid than of linezolid. FICIs were lowest between tedizolid and amikacin for M. abscessus (FICI = 0.75) and between tedizolid and ethambutol for M. avium (FICI = 0.72). Clarithromycin and tedizolid showed initial synergy, which was abrogated by erm(41)-induced macrolide resistance (FICI = 0.53). Tedizolid had a weak bacteriostatic effect on M. abscessus and combination with amikacin slightly prolonged its effect. Tedizolid had concentration-dependent activity against M. avium and its efficacy was enhanced by ethambutol. Both combinations had a concentration-dependent synergistic effect. Tedizolid could inhibit the intracellular bacterial population of both M. avium and M. abscessus. CONCLUSIONS: Tedizolid should be further investigated in pharmacodynamic studies and clinical trials for M. avium complex pulmonary disease. It is less active against M. abscessus, but still promising.

Minocycline treatment for pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex disease based on pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and Bayesian framework mathematical models.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to identify the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters of minocycline in the hollow-fibre system (HFS) model of pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and to identify the optimal clinical dose. METHODS: Minocycline MICs for 55 MAC clinical isolates from the Netherlands were determined. We also co-incubated primary isolated macrophages infected with MAC with minocycline. Next, we performed a 28 day HFS-MAC model dose-response study in which we mimicked pulmonary concentration-time profiles achieved in patients. The HFS-MAC model was sampled at intervals to determine the minocycline pharmacokinetics and MAC burden. We identified the AUC0-24/MIC ratios associated with 1.0 log10 cfu/mL kill below day 0 (stasis), defined as a bactericidal effect. We then performed 10000 Monte Carlo experiments to identify the optimal dose for a bactericidal effect in patients. RESULTS: The MIC for 50% and 90% of cumulative clinical isolates was 8 and 64 mg/L, respectively. Minocycline decreased MAC bacterial burden below stasis in primary isolated macrophages. In the HFS-MAC model, minocycline achieved a microbial kill of 3.6 log10 cfu/mL below stasis. The AUC0-24/MIC exposure associated with a bactericidal effect was 59. Monte Carlo experiments identified a minocycline susceptibility MIC breakpoint of 16 mg/L. At this proposed breakpoint, the clinical dose of 200 mg/day achieved the bactericidal effect exposure target in ∼50% of patients, while 400 mg/day achieved this in 73.6% of patients, in Monte Carlo experiments. CONCLUSIONS: Minocycline at a dose of 400 mg/day is expected to be bactericidal. We propose a clinical trial for validation.

A bedaquiline/clofazimine combination regimen might add activity to the treatment of clinically relevant non-tuberculous mycobacteria.

BACKGROUND: Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infections are hard to treat. New antimicrobial drugs and smarter combination regimens are needed. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to determine the in vitro activity of bedaquiline against NTM and assess its synergy with established antimycobacterials. METHODS: We determined MICs of bedaquiline for clinically relevant NTM species and Mycobacterium tuberculosis by broth microdilution for 30 isolates. Synergy testing was performed using the chequerboard method for 22 reference strains and clinical isolates of Mycobacterium abscessus (MAB) and Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC). Time-kill kinetics (TK) assays with resistance monitoring of bedaquiline alone and combined with clofazimine were performed for MAB CIP 104536 and M. avium ATCC 700898; bedaquiline/clarithromycin combinations were evaluated against M. avium ATCC 700898. Interactions were assessed for TK experiments based on Bliss independence. RESULTS: Bedaquiline had modest activity against tested NTM, with MICs between <0.007 and 1 mg/L. Bedaquiline showed no interaction with tested drugs against MAB or MAC. Lowest mean fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) values were 0.79 with clofazimine for MAB and 0.97 with clofazimine and 0.82 with clarithromycin for MAC. In TK assays, bedaquiline showed a bacteriostatic effect. Clofazimine extended the bacteriostatic activity of bedaquiline against MAB and yielded a slight bactericidal effect against M. avium. The bedaquiline/clofazimine combination slowed emergence of bedaquiline resistance for M. avium but promoted it for MAB. Relative to Bliss independence, bedaquiline/clofazimine showed synergistic interaction over time for MAB and no interaction for M. avium and bedaquiline/clarithromycin showed antagonistic interaction for M. avium. CONCLUSIONS: Following these in vitro data, a bedaquiline/clofazimine combination might add activity to MAB and MAC treatment. The bedaquiline/clarithromycin combination might have lower activity compared with bedaquiline alone for MAC treatment.

Minocycline Has No Clear Role in the Treatment of Mycobacterium abscessus Disease.

Mycobacterium abscessus causes a difficult-to-treat pulmonary disease (MAb-PD). After initial intravenous treatment, minocycline is recommended in the oral continuation phase of treatment. We determined the MICs, synergy, and time-kill kinetics of minocycline against M. abscessus With MICs of 8 to 512 mg/liter, rapid emergence of tolerance in time-kill assays, and no synergy with other drugs used to treat MAb-PD, minocycline appears ineffective against M. abscessus These in vitro data question its role as a MAb-PD treatment modality.