Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Environ Sci Technol ; 50(7): 3290-314, 2016 Apr 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26902161

RESUMEN

Much interest is directed at the chemical structure of hydraulic fracturing (HF) additives in unconventional gas exploitation. To bridge the gap between existing alphabetical disclosures by function/CAS number and emerging scientific contributions on fate and toxicity, we review the structural properties which motivate HF applications, and which determine environmental fate and toxicity. Our quantitative overview relied on voluntary U.S. disclosures evaluated from the FracFocus registry by different sources and on a House of Representatives ("Waxman") list. Out of over 1000 reported substances, classification by chemistry yielded succinct subsets able to illustrate the rationale of their use, and physicochemical properties relevant for environmental fate, toxicity and chemical analysis. While many substances were nontoxic, frequent disclosures also included notorious groundwater contaminants like petroleum hydrocarbons (solvents), precursors of endocrine disruptors like nonylphenols (nonemulsifiers), toxic propargyl alcohol (corrosion inhibitor), tetramethylammonium (clay stabilizer), biocides or strong oxidants. Application of highly oxidizing chemicals, together with occasional disclosures of putative delayed acids and complexing agents (i.e., compounds designed to react in the subsurface) suggests that relevant transformation products may be formed. To adequately investigate such reactions, available information is not sufficient, but instead a full disclosure of HF additives is necessary.


Asunto(s)
Fracking Hidráulico/métodos , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/análisis , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/química , Reactivos de Enlaces Cruzados/química , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Agua Subterránea/química , Humanos , Hidrocarburos/química , Petróleo , Polímeros/química , Salud Pública , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
2.
Environ Sci Technol ; 49(14): 8347-55, 2015 Jul 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26147419

RESUMEN

Volumes of natural gas extraction-derived wastewaters have increased sharply over the past decade, but the ultimate fate of those waste streams is poorly characterized. Here, we sought to (a) quantify natural gas residual fluid sources and endpoints to bound the scope of potential waste stream impacts and (b) describe the organic pollutants discharged to surface waters following treatment, a route of likely ecological exposure. Our findings indicate that centralized waste treatment facilities (CWTF) received 9.5% (8.5 × 10(8) L) of natural gas residual fluids in 2013, with some facilities discharging all effluent to surface waters. In dry months, discharged water volumes were on the order of the receiving body flows for some plants, indicating that surface waters can become waste-dominated in summer. As disclosed organic compounds used in high volume hydraulic fracturing (HVHF) vary greatly in physicochemical properties, we deployed a suite of analytical techniques to characterize CWTF effluents, covering 90.5% of disclosed compounds. Results revealed that, of nearly 1000 disclosed organic compounds used in HVHF, only petroleum distillates and alcohol polyethoxylates were present. Few analytes targeted by regulatory agencies (e.g., benzene or toluene) were observed, highlighting the need for expanded and improved monitoring efforts at CWTFs.


Asunto(s)
Fracking Hidráulico/métodos , Gas Natural , Aguas Residuales/química , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/análisis , Ambiente , Residuos Industriales , Compuestos Orgánicos/análisis , Pennsylvania , Petróleo , Estaciones del Año , Aguas Residuales/análisis
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA