Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Gynecol Oncol ; 144(1): 167-173, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27817932

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine survival outcome in patients with serous cancer in the ovary, fallopian tube, peritoneum and of undesignated origin. METHODS: Nation-wide population-based study of women≥18years with histologically verified non-uterine serous cancer, included in the Swedish Quality Registry for primary cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube and peritoneum diagnosed 2009-2013. Relative survival (RS) was estimated using the Ederer II method. Simple and multivariable analyses were estimated by Poisson regression models. RESULTS: Of 5627 women identified, 1246 (22%) had borderline tumors and 4381 had malignant tumors. In total, 2359 women had serous cancer; 71% originated in the ovary (OC), 9% in the fallopian tube (FTC), 9% in the peritoneum (PPC) and 11% at an undesignated primary site (UPS). Estimated RS at 5-years was 37%; for FTC 54%, 40% for OC, 34% for PPC and 13% for UPS. In multivariable regression analyses restricted to women who had undergone primary or interval debulking surgery for OC, FTC and PPC, site of origin was not independently associated with survival. Significant associations with worse survival were found for advanced stages (RR 2.63, P<0.001), moderate (RR 1.90, P<0.047) and poor differentiation (RR 2.20, P<0.009), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (RR1.33, P<0.022), residual tumor (RR 2.65, P<0.001) and platinum single (2.34, P<0.001) compared to platinum combination chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Survival was poorer for serous cancer at UPS than for ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal cancer. Serous cancer at UPS needs to be addressed when reporting and comparing survival rates of ovarian cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Quísticas, Mucinosas y Serosas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Primarias Desconocidas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/patología , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasia Residual , Neoplasias Quísticas, Mucinosas y Serosas/patología , Neoplasias Quísticas, Mucinosas y Serosas/terapia , Neoplasias Primarias Desconocidas/patología , Neoplasias Primarias Desconocidas/terapia , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Neoplasias Peritoneales/patología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Compuestos de Platino/uso terapéutico , Sistema de Registros , Tasa de Supervivencia , Suecia/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
2.
Acta Haematol ; 136(3): 167-73, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27537981

RESUMEN

This study focuses on the incidence, treatment, and survival of de novo acute leukemia in a 25-year perspective in western Sweden and Estonia. At the beginning of our study, Estonia was a part of the Eastern bloc with planned economy, but since 1991 it is a member of the European Union and transforming into a market economy. Survival rates have steadily increased in both countries. However, a gap between their survival curves remains. Based on our data, it is difficult to explain the big difference in the 5-year relative survival in favor of western Sweden (55 vs. 22%). In Germany, there was a big difference in overall cancer survival between East and West Germany after the fall of the iron curtain, but today no difference is seen. Differences in survival are probably due to a higher proportion of intense chemotherapy regimens and a higher rate of hematopoietic stem cell transplantations in Sweden. Other important factors might be better supportive care and diagnostics as well as better adjuvant therapy. Better staff training and conditions in wards are also factors that might play an essential role.


Asunto(s)
Leucemia/mortalidad , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Estonia/epidemiología , Femenino , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Humanos , Leucemia/diagnóstico , Leucemia/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Suecia/epidemiología
3.
Environ Res ; 109(8): 985-90, 2009 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19781695

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the incidence of leukaemia in an area downwind of a large oil refinery emitting carcinogenic volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including benzene. METHODS: Using a dispersion model and the prevailing wind direction, two parishes with about 5000 inhabitants were a priori considered to be exposed to VOCs from the refinery. Numbers of observed and expected leukaemia cases in 1975-2004 were calculated using regional sex- and age-specific incidence rates. In addition, five nearby parishes (12000 inhabitants), considered unaffected by the emissions, served as a local reference area. Based on emission data, dispersion modelling and VOC measurements, the refinery's contribution to the population's exposure to carcinogenic VOCs was estimated. Published "unit risks" for carcinogenic VOCs were used to estimate the expected excess leukaemia risk. RESULTS: The incidence of leukaemia in the "exposed parishes" was significantly increased in 1975-2004 (33 cases v. 22 expected cases), owing to an increase in the last 10-year period, from 1995 to 2004 (19 cases v. 8.5 expected cases). The leukaemia incidence in the local control area was normal (50 cases v. 56 expected cases). The estimated contribution from the refinery to VOC concentrations was, however, only about 2 microg/m(3) (yearly average) for benzene, 2 microg/m(3) for ethylene, 0.5 microg/m(3) for 1,3-butadiene and 5 microg/m(3) for propene. Calculations of expected excess risk using published risk estimates would indicate a much lower excess risk in the exposed parishes. CONCLUSIONS: Using risk estimates extrapolated from high-level exposure, we would not expect an increase of leukaemia at low exposure to VOC emissions. Nevertheless, the clear elevation of leukaemia in the priori selected, exposed parishes was remarkable. Our finding may reflect a causal association due to emissions, but it could also be due to unknown confounding, or chance.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos/toxicidad , Industria Química , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Leucemia/epidemiología , Petróleo , Compuestos Orgánicos Volátiles/toxicidad , Humanos , Incidencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA