Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Laryngoscope ; 111(10): 1691-6, 2001 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11801927

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We present the frequencies of various types of mandibular fractures along with associated mechanisms and injuries. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 5196 mandible fractures in 4381 patients extracted from the Total Army Injury and Health Outcomes Database (TAIHOD), a comprehensive database developed by the U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (USARIEM) that links population data to all hospitalizations among active duty army soldiers. The database is based on the ICD-9 CM coding system. RESULTS: We found the following frequencies for specific mandible fracture locations: angle 35.6%, symphysis 20.1%, subcondylar 14.2%, body 12.7%, condylar process 9.1%, ramus 4.5%, alveolar border 2.7%, and coronoid process 1%. The mechanisms of injury were separated into seven categories. Fighting accounts for 36.2%, automobile accidents for 18.6%, athletics for 13.6%, falls for 9.7%, motorcycle accidents for 3.1%, other land transport accidents for 3%, and miscellaneous causes for 15.8%. A few fracture locations appear to be associated with specific mechanisms. Of 82 alveolar border fractures with known mechanisms, 37% resulted from automobile accidents. Of 1094 angle fractures with known mechanisms, 48.6% resulted from fighting. Our data show that the majority of fractures were isolated to one location. Only one fracture was recorded for 70.6%, 29.2% have two fractures recorded, 0.2% have three or more fractures recorded. Associated injuries were common and include facial lacerations 1236 (28.2%), non-mandible facial bone fractures 733 (16.7%), intracranial injury 403(9.2%), internal injuries 229 (5.2%), fractures of the upper limb 295 (6.7%), fractures of the lower extremity 302 (6.9%), and cervical fractures 34 (0.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The mechanism of injury is important in determining the most likely resultant mandible fracture in the case of angle of mandible and alveolar ridge fractures. The clinician should maintain a high level of suspicion for associated injuries that occur more than one fourth of the time and even more frequently in motor vehicle accident victims. Associated intracranial injury is particularly important to rule out. Associated facial fractures, intracranial injury, internal injuries, and extremity injuries are all more common than cervical fractures.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Mandibulares/epidemiología , Personal Militar/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Fracturas Mandibulares/clasificación , Fracturas Mandibulares/etiología , Fracturas Mandibulares/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismo Múltiple/clasificación , Traumatismo Múltiple/epidemiología , Traumatismo Múltiple/etiología , Traumatismo Múltiple/cirugía , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
2.
Laryngoscope ; 105(2): 140-3, 1995 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8544592

RESUMEN

The effectiveness of local anesthetics is improved by the addition of a vasoconstrictor which increases duration of action and decreases both systemic toxic reactions and local bleeding. Epinephrine, the standard drug for vasoconstriction, has some limitations due to potential dose-related cardiac and local toxic effects. The authors examined the minimal effective epinephrine concentration required for maximal cutaneous vasoconstriction in the human subject so as to limit potential dose-related side effects. In a randomized, double-blinded prospective study, 23 patients undergoing head and neck surgical procedures under general anesthesia were enrolled to quantify the effect of subdermal infiltration of 1% lidocaine with epinephrine at varying concentrations on local cutaneous bloodflow utilizing laser Doppler flowmetry. A comparison of the onset of vasoconstriction and magnitude of diminished bloodflow was made for several commonly used concentrations of epinephrine, with 1% lidocaine and normal saline serving as controls. There were no significant differences (P > .05) between epinephrine concentrations of 1:400,000, 1:200,000, 1:100,000, and 1:50,000 when examining onset and magnitude of vasoconstriction.


Asunto(s)
Epinefrina/farmacología , Piel/irrigación sanguínea , Simpatomiméticos/farmacología , Vasoconstrictores/farmacología , Anestesia General , Anestesia Local , Anestésicos Locales/farmacología , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Flujometría por Láser-Doppler , Lidocaína/farmacología , Cuello/irrigación sanguínea , Estudios Prospectivos , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional/efectos de los fármacos , Vasoconstricción/efectos de los fármacos , Vasodilatación/efectos de los fármacos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA