Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
JCI Insight ; 7(9)2022 05 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35316217

RESUMEN

BACKGROUNDImmune cell profiling of primary and metastatic CNS tumors has been focused on the tumor, not the tumor microenvironment (TME), or has been analyzed via biopsies.METHODSEn bloc resections of gliomas (n = 10) and lung metastases (n = 10) were analyzed via tissue segmentation and high-dimension Opal 7-color multiplex imaging. Single-cell RNA analyses were used to infer immune cell functionality.RESULTSWithin gliomas, T cells were localized in the infiltrating edge and perivascular space of tumors, while residing mostly in the stroma of metastatic tumors. CD163+ macrophages were evident throughout the TME of metastatic tumors, whereas in gliomas, CD68+, CD11c+CD68+, and CD11c+CD68+CD163+ cell subtypes were commonly observed. In lung metastases, T cells interacted with CD163+ macrophages as dyads and clusters at the brain-tumor interface and within the tumor itself and as clusters within the necrotic core. In contrast, gliomas typically lacked dyad and cluster interactions, except for T cell CD68+ cell dyads within the tumor. Analysis of transcriptomic data in glioblastomas revealed that innate immune cells expressed both proinflammatory and immunosuppressive gene signatures.CONCLUSIONOur results show that immunosuppressive macrophages are abundant within the TME and that the immune cell interactome between cancer lineages is distinct. Further, these data provide information for evaluating the role of different immune cell populations in brain tumor growth and therapeutic responses.FUNDINGThis study was supported by the NIH (NS120547), a Developmental research project award (P50CA221747), ReMission Alliance, institutional funding from Northwestern University and the Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, and gifts from the Mosky family and Perry McKay. Performed in the Flow Cytometry & Cellular Imaging Core Facility at MD Anderson Cancer Center, this study received support in part from the NIH (CA016672) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Research Specialist award 1 (R50 CA243707). Additional support was provided by CCSG Bioinformatics Shared Resource 5 (P30 CA046592), a gift from Agilent Technologies, a Research Scholar Grant from the American Cancer Society (RSG-16-005-01), a Precision Health Investigator Award from University of Michigan (U-M) Precision Health, the NCI (R37-CA214955), startup institutional research funds from U-M, and a Biomedical Informatics & Data Science Training Grant (T32GM141746).


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioblastoma , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Sistema Nervioso Central/metabolismo , Glioblastoma/patología , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Macrófagos/metabolismo , Factor de Transcripción STAT3/metabolismo , Microambiente Tumoral , Estados Unidos
2.
Neuro Oncol ; 21(12): 1498-1508, 2019 12 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31276167

RESUMEN

Accurate pathologic diagnoses and molecularly informed treatment decisions for a wide variety of cancers depend on robust clinical molecular testing that uses genomic, epigenomic, and transcriptomic-based tools. Nowhere is this more essential than in the workup of brain tumors, as emphasized by the incorporation of molecular criteria into the 2016 World Health Organization classification of central nervous system tumors and the updated official guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Despite the medical necessity of molecular testing in brain tumors, access to and utilization of molecular diagnostics is still highly variable across institutions, and a lack of reimbursement for such testing remains a significant obstacle. The objectives of this review are (i) to identify barriers to adoption of molecular testing in brain tumors, (ii) to describe the current molecular tools recommended for the clinical evaluation of brain tumors, and (iii) to summarize how molecular data are interpreted to guide clinical care, so as to improve understanding and justification for their coverage in the routine workup of adult and pediatric brain tumor cases.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Patología Molecular/métodos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/genética , Humanos , Pronóstico
3.
Nature ; 547(7663): 355-359, 2017 07 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28678782

RESUMEN

Glioblastoma is a universally lethal cancer with a median survival time of approximately 15 months. Despite substantial efforts to define druggable targets, there are no therapeutic options that notably extend the lifespan of patients with glioblastoma. While previous work has largely focused on in vitro cellular models, here we demonstrate a more physiologically relevant approach to target discovery in glioblastoma. We adapted pooled RNA interference (RNAi) screening technology for use in orthotopic patient-derived xenograft models, creating a high-throughput negative-selection screening platform in a functional in vivo tumour microenvironment. Using this approach, we performed parallel in vivo and in vitro screens and discovered that the chromatin and transcriptional regulators needed for cell survival in vivo are non-overlapping with those required in vitro. We identified transcription pause-release and elongation factors as one set of in vivo-specific cancer dependencies, and determined that these factors are necessary for enhancer-mediated transcriptional adaptations that enable cells to survive the tumour microenvironment. Our lead hit, JMJD6, mediates the upregulation of in vivo stress and stimulus response pathways through enhancer-mediated transcriptional pause-release, promoting cell survival specifically in vivo. Targeting JMJD6 or other identified elongation factors extends survival in orthotopic xenograft mouse models, suggesting that targeting transcription elongation machinery may be an effective therapeutic strategy for glioblastoma. More broadly, this study demonstrates the power of in vivo phenotypic screening to identify new classes of 'cancer dependencies' not identified by previous in vitro approaches, and could supply new opportunities for therapeutic intervention.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos/métodos , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Glioblastoma/genética , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/tendencias , Factores de Elongación Transcripcional/antagonistas & inhibidores , Factores de Elongación Transcripcional/metabolismo , Animales , Línea Celular Tumoral , Supervivencia Celular , Cromatina/metabolismo , Elementos de Facilitación Genéticos/genética , Femenino , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Glioblastoma/patología , Humanos , Histona Demetilasas con Dominio de Jumonji/antagonistas & inhibidores , Histona Demetilasas con Dominio de Jumonji/metabolismo , Masculino , Ratones , Interferencia de ARN , Transcripción Genética , Microambiente Tumoral , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA