RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of ß-lactams in critically ill patients has been correlated with better clinical outcomes. Evidence on TDM of newer ß-lactams such as ceftazidime/avibactam administered by continuous infusion (CI) is very limited. OBJECTIVES: To describe our experience with TDM of ceftazidime/avibactam and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment in patients with MDR bacterial infections. Clinical outcomes of ceftazidime/avibactam administered by CI were also assessed. METHODS: Patients treated with ceftazidime/avibactam administered by CI and undergoing TDM of ceftazidime plasma concentrations were included. Blood samples were obtained as part of the TDM program. The PK/PD therapeutic target of ceftazidime/avibactam was defined as 100%fTâ>â4â×âMIC of the causative pathogen, and 100%fTâ>â10â×âMIC was considered overexposure. Dose changes were made according to the TDM results. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were included. Ceftazidime/avibactam total daily doses ranged from 1 g/0.25 g to 6 g/1.5 g. Twenty-six patients (83.9%) achieved a 100%fTâ>â4â×âMIC, 15 (48.4%) of which were overexposed (100%fTâ>â10â×âMIC). Dose reduction was suggested in 16/28 (57.1%) patients and dose maintenance in 12/28 (42.9%). Overall clinical cure was observed in 21 (67.7%) patients, and 18 of these (85.7%) achieved a 100%fTâ>â4â×âMIC. CONCLUSIONS: Administering ceftazidime/avibactam by CI enabled the desired PK/PD target to be achieved in a large proportion of patients, even at lower doses than those recommended for a 2 h extended infusion. We suggest that the use of CI with TDM may be a useful tool for reducing initial doses, which could help to reduce antimicrobial-related adverse effects and treatment costs.
Asunto(s)
Ceftazidima , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas , Humanos , Ceftazidima/farmacología , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Monitoreo de Drogas , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/farmacología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Combinación de Medicamentos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad MicrobianaRESUMEN
This document gathers the opinion of a multidisciplinary forum of experts on different aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in Spain. It has been structured around a series of questions that the attendees considered relevant and in which a consensus opinion was reached. The main messages were as follows: CDI should be suspected in patients older than 2 years of age in the presence of diarrhea, paralytic ileus and unexplained leukocytosis, even in the absence of classical risk factors. With a few exceptions, a single stool sample is sufficient for diagnosis, which can be sent to the laboratory with or without transportation media for enteropathogenic bacteria. In the absence of diarrhoea, rectal swabs may be valid. The microbiology laboratory should include C. difficile among the pathogens routinely searched in patients with diarrhoea. Laboratory tests in different order and sequence schemes include GDH detection, presence of toxins, molecular tests and toxigenic culture. Immediate determination of sensitivity to drugs such as vancomycin, metronidazole or fidaxomycin is not required. The evolution of toxin persistence is not a suitable test for follow up. Laboratory diagnosis of CDI should be rapid and results reported and interpreted to clinicians immediately. In addition to the basic support of all diarrheic episodes, CDI treatment requires the suppression of antiperistaltic agents, proton pump inhibitors and antibiotics, where possible. Oral vancomycin and fidaxomycin are the antibacterials of choice in treatment, intravenous metronidazole being restricted for patients in whom the presence of the above drugs in the intestinal lumen cannot be assured. Fecal material transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with multiple recurrences but uncertainties persist regarding its standardization and safety. Bezlotoxumab is a monoclonal antibody to C. difficile toxin B that should be administered to patients at high risk of recurrence. Surgery is becoming less and less necessary and prevention with vaccines is under research. Probiotics have so far not been shown to be therapeutically or preventively effective. The therapeutic strategy should be based, rather than on the number of episodes, on the severity of the episodes and on their potential to recur. Some data point to the efficacy of oral vancomycin prophylaxis in patients who reccur CDI when systemic antibiotics are required again.