RESUMEN
Aspergillus spp. osteoarticular infections are destructive opportunistic infections, while there is no clear consensus on their management. The purpose of this review is to investigate the current literature regarding Aspergillus spp. osteoarticular infections. An electronic search of the PubMed and Scopus databases was conducted considering studies that assessed osteoarticular infections from Aspergillus spp. We included only studies with biopsy proven documentation of positive cultures or histological findings for Aspergillus spp., and those with essential information for each case such as the anatomical location of the infection, the type of treatment (conservative, surgical, combination), the antifungal therapy, and the outcome. Overall, 148 studies from 1965 to 2021 including 186 patients were included in the review. One hundred and seven (57.5%) patients underwent surgical debridement in addition to antifungal therapy, while 79 (42.7%) patients were treated only conservatively. Complete infection resolution was reported in 107 (57.5%) patients, while partial resolution in 29 (15.5%) patients. Surgical debridement resulted in higher complete infection resolution rate compared to only antifungal therapy (70.0% vs. 40.5%, P < 0.001), while complete resolution rate was similar for antifungal monotherapy and combination/sequential therapy (58.3% vs. 54.5%; P = 0.76). Last, complete resolution rate was also similar for monotherapy with amphotericin B (58.1%) and voriconazole (58.6%; P = 0.95). The results of this study indicate that antifungal monotherapy has similar efficacy with combination/sequential therapy, while voriconazole has similar efficacy with amphotericin B. Moreover, surgical debridement of the infected focus results in better outcomes in terms of infection eradication compared to conservative treatment. LAY SUMMARY: Antifungal monotherapy has similar efficacy with combination/sequential therapy, and voriconazole has similar efficacy with amphotericin B for the treatment of Aspergillus spp. osteoarticular infections, while surgical debridement of the infected focus improves the infection eradication rate.
Asunto(s)
Anfotericina B , Aspergilosis , Animales , Anfotericina B/uso terapéutico , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Aspergilosis/diagnóstico , Aspergilosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Aspergilosis/cirugía , Aspergilosis/veterinaria , Aspergillus , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/veterinaria , Resultado del Tratamiento , Voriconazol/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
This paper evaluated magnetic nanoparticle-enhanced PCR for the detection and identification of Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella enteritidis. Two different types of magnetic nanoparticles designated MPIO (iron concentration 2.5 mg/ml, size 1 µm) and NP (iron concentration 8.7 mg/ml, size 60 nm), both conjugated with S. aureus or S. enteritidis antibodies were evaluated as an enrichment procedure for PCR-detection of the pathogens in Trypticase Soy Broth, milk, blood and meat broth. Bacterial suspensions (1.5x108 cfu/ml) were prepared and serial diluted 10-1. The MPIO and NP nanoparticles were added, followed by incubation for 1 hour at room temperature, magnetic separation of the pellet, DNA extraction and PCR, targeting the femA and invA sequences. The nanoparticle-free and the NP-supplemented dilutions were positive down to the 1.5x102 cfu/ml concentration for both bacteria. The MPIO-supplemented dilutions were positive down to approx. 2x100 cfu/ml concentration, respectively. Bacteria-free TSB was negative by PCR. MPIO nanoparticles (size 1 µm) enhanced the detection of S. aureus and S. enteritidis by PCR, whilst NP nanoparticles (size 60 nm) did not, thus indicating that the size of the magnetic nanoparticles play a significant role in the enrichment procedure.