Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Neurogastroenterol Motil ; 32(11): e13949, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33107679

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gastric electrical simulation has been shown to relieve nausea and vomiting in medically refractory patients. Efficacy of gastric electrical stimulation has been reported mostly in short-term studies, but none has evaluated its efficacy beyond 10 years after implantation. METHODS: Patients implanted at our center for medically refractory severe and chronic nausea and/or vomiting were evaluated before and over 10 years after implantation using symptomatic scale and quality of life (GIQLI) score. Improvement was defined as a reduction of more than 50% in vomiting frequency. KEY RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were implanted from January 1998 to December 2009. Among them, 7 were explanted due to a lack of efficacy and/or side effects, 2 died, and 4 were lost to follow-up. Mean follow-up was 10.5 ± 3.7 years. In intention-to-treat analysis, 27/50 (54%) patients reported an improvement. Beyond 10 years, an improvement in early satiety (3.05 vs 1.76, <0.001), bloating (2.51 vs 1.70, P = .012), nausea (2.46 vs 1.35, P = .001), and vomiting (3.35 vs 1.49 P < .001) scores were observed. Quality of life improved over 10 years (GIQLI score: 69.7 vs. 86.4, P = .005) and body mass index (BMI: 23.4 vs. 26.2 kg/m2 ; P = .048). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Gastric electrical simulation is effective in the long-term in patients with medically refractory nausea and vomiting, with an efficacy of 54% at 10 years on an intention-to-treat analysis. Other long-term observational studies are warranted to confirm these results.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Gastroparesia/terapia , Náusea/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Estómago , Vómitos/terapia , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/fisiopatología , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Gastroparesia/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Náusea/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vómitos/fisiopatología
2.
Bull Cancer ; 106(11): 959-968, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31623835

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Totally implanted venous access (TIVA) improves the safety and welfare of patients treated with cancer chemotherapy (CCT). We aimed to evaluate patients' perception of TIVA placement, TIVA use, and information on TIVA, and to assess the association between patients' perception and their attitude regarding a potential TIVA re-implantation. METHODS: We conducted a single center cross-sectional survey in a university hospital in Northern France. Patients included were consecutive urologic or digestive cancer inpatients admitted for a CCT cycle via TIVA between April 9th and May 9th 2014. We analyzed patients' satisfaction, experience, and attitude, especially when requiring potential TIVA re-implantation under local anesthesia (LA), using a standardized questionnaire and medical records. We analyzed risk factors for refusing potential TIVA re-implantation under LA using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were interviewed (no refusals), including 57 with a TIVA device placed under LA in our university hospital. Among them, 52/57 (91%) reported satisfactory TIVA placement, but respectively 21/57 (37%) and 18/57 (32%) complained of painful or uncomfortable TIVA placement; 51/57 (89%) were satisfied with care provided during CCT cycles. Risk factors for refusing potential re-implantation under LA were: TIVA placement considered painful (P=0.012) or uncomfortable (P=0.038) and dissatisfaction with care provided during CCT cycles (P=0.028). DISCUSSION: We show that despite good overall satisfaction regarding TIVA, some aspects were less positive and warrant improvement actions. It suggests that these actions could not only improve patients' experience of TIVA use but could also facilitate continuation of treatment in the long term.


Asunto(s)
Actitud , Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/psicología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Neoplasias Urológicas/psicología , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anestesia Local , Estudios Transversales , Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/etiología , Análisis de Regresión , Retratamiento/psicología , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Negativa del Paciente al Tratamiento/psicología , Negativa del Paciente al Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/efectos adversos
3.
Fertil Steril ; 107(4): 977-986.e2, 2017 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28139235

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the postoperative outcomes of patients with rectal endometriosis managed by disc excision using transanal staplers. DESIGN: Prospective study using data recorded in the CIRENDO database (NCT02294825). SETTING: University tertiary referral center. PATIENT(S): A total of 111 consecutive patients managed between June 2009 and June 2016. INTERVENTION(S): We performed rectal disc excision using two different transanal staplers: [1] the Contour Transtar stapler (the Rouen technique); and [2] the end to end anastomosis circular transanal stapler. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE(S): Pre- and postoperative digestive function was assessed using standardized gastrointestinal questionnaires: the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index and the Knowles-Eccersley-Scott Symptom Questionnaire. RESULT(S): The two staplers were used in 42 (37.8%) and 69 patients (62.2%), respectively. The largest diameter of specimens achieved was significantly higher using the Rouen technique (mean ± SD, 59 ± 11 mm vs. 36 ± 7 mm), which was used to remove nodules located lower in the rectum (5.5 ± 1.3 cm vs. 9.7 ± 2.5 cm) infiltrating more frequently the adjacent posterior vaginal wall (83.3% vs. 49.3%). Associated nodules involving sigmoid colon were managed by distinct procedures, either disc excision (2.7%) or segmental resection of sigmoid colon (9.9%). Postoperative values for the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index increased 1 and 3 years after the surgery, but improvement in constipation was not significant. The probability of pregnancy at 1 year after the arrest of medical treatment was 73.3% (95% confidence interval 54.9%-88.9%), with a majority of spontaneous conceptions. CONCLUSION(S): Disc excision using transanal staplers is a valuable alternative to colorectal resection in selected patients presenting with rectal endometriosis, allowing for good preservation of rectal function.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía/instrumentación , Endometriosis/cirugía , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Engrapadoras Quirúrgicas , Grapado Quirúrgico/instrumentación , Adulto , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Endometriosis/diagnóstico , Endometriosis/fisiopatología , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Fertilidad , Francia , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Enfermedades del Recto/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Recto/fisiopatología , Factores de Riesgo , Grapado Quirúrgico/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo para Quedar Embarazada , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
World J Surg ; 40(12): 3035-3043, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27412631

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an emerging curative treatment option for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. It has a long-term survival benefit but is associated with high rates of morbidity, ranging from 12 % to 65 %, mainly due to infectious complications. We sought to evaluate the clinical relevance of routine intraoperative bacteriological sampling following CRS/HIPEC. STUDY DESIGN: Between November 2010 and December 2014, every patients receiving CRS/HIPEC were included. Three samples were routinely collected from standardized locations for intraperitoneal rinsing liquid bacteriological analysis (RLBA) after completion of HIPEC. The clinical and surgical features, bacteriological results, and short-term outcomes were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The overall mortality and morbidity rates were 5 and 45 %, respectively. Among the 75 included patients, 40 % (n = 30) had at least one positive bacterial culture. Risk factors for a positive culture were colorectal resection (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 3.072, 95 % CI 1.843-8.004; p = 0.009) and blood loss >1000 mL (HR = 4.272, 95 % CI 1.080-18.141; p = 0.031). Among 26 (35 %) patients with abdominal infectious complications, 13 (17 %) experienced isolated complications. A positive RLBA result was independently associated with abdominal infectious complications (HR = 5.108, 95 % CI 1.220-16.336; p = 0.024) and isolated abdominal infectious complications (HR = 4.199, 95 % CI 1.064-15.961; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Forty percent of the RLBA samples obtained following CRS/HIPEC tested positive for bacteria. Bacterial sampling of rinsing liquid should be systematically performed. An aggressive and immediate antibiotic strategy needs to be evaluated.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Carcinoma/terapia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Hipertermia Inducida , Infecciones Intraabdominales/etiología , Cavidad Peritoneal/microbiología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Volumen Sanguíneo , Carcinoma/mortalidad , Terapia Combinada , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia
5.
World J Surg ; 40(8): 1941-50, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27098539

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: High rates of recurrence have been observed after curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The main aim of this study was to establish the influence of adjuvant transarterial radioembolization-based I-131 lipiodol on survival and recurrence. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2010, 38 patients were treated with adjuvant I-131 lipiodol therapy, at a dosage of 2220 MBq, within 4 months after surgery. This treated cohort was compared to a control cohort consisting of 42 consecutive patients operated prior to the time the I-131 lipiodol treatment became available. RESULTS: Recurrence-free survival in the control and in the I-131 lipiodol cohort was 12.6 and 18.7 months, respectively (HR = 1.871, p = 0.025). At 2 and 5 years, the cumulative incidence of a first recurrence or death was, respectively, 50 % and 61 % in the treated cohort versus 69 % and 74 % in the control cohort. Median overall survival was 55 and 29 months, respectively (p = 0.051). Among patients with a recurrence at 2 years, more patients had already experienced such recurrence at 1 year in the control cohort (70 % vs 33 %, p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant I-131 lipiodol improves disease-free survival in patients with HCC.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Quimioembolización Terapéutica , Aceite Etiodizado/administración & dosificación , Radioisótopos de Yodo/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Anciano , Ablación por Catéter , Terapia Combinada , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Hepatectomía , Humanos , Inyecciones Intraarteriales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tasa de Supervivencia
6.
Support Care Cancer ; 24(4): 1857-63, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26454864

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Although considered safer than central venous catheters for administration of cancer chemotherapy, totally implanted venous access (TIVA) is associated with adverse events that may impair prognosis and quality of life of patients receiving chemotherapy. Our aim was to assess the feasibility and interest of surveillance of cancer chemotherapy TIVA-adverse events (AE), associated with morbidity-mortality conferences (MMCs) on TIVA-AE. METHODS: We performed a prospective interventional study in two hospitals (a university hospital and a comprehensive care center). For each cancer chemotherapy care pathway within each hospital, we set up surveillance of TIVA-AE and MMC on these events. Patients included in surveillance were those with a TIVA either placed or used for chemotherapy cycles in one of the participating wards. Feasibility of MMC was assessed by the number of MMC meetings that actually took place and the number of participants at each meeting. The interest of MMC was assessed by the number of TIVA-AE identified and analyzed, and the number and type of improvement actions selected and actually implemented. RESULTS: We recorded 0.41 adverse events per 1000 TIVA-day. MMCs were implemented in all care pathways, with sustained pluriprofessional attendance throughout the survey; 39 improvement actions were identified during meetings, and 18 were actually implemented. CONCLUSIONS: Surveillance of TIVA-AE associated with MMC is feasible and helps change practices. It could be useful for improving care of patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Morbilidad , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida
7.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 25(2): 213-7, 2013 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23075698

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is now considered as a new therapeutic alternative for patients with medically refractory vomiting and/or nausea, although its mechanisms of action remain poorly understood. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Gastric discomfort threshold, measured as the gastric maximal tolerable volume (MTV) to distension, was examined before and after GES, in nine patients implanted for chronic and severe nausea and vomiting. RESULTS: GES increased gastric MTV from 522 ± 64 ml at baseline to 628 ± 60 ml 6 months after the start of GES (P=0.03), whereas gastric emptying remained unchanged. The increase in MTV was correlated with symptoms and quality of life at 6 months, whereas gastric emptying was not. Finally, MTV varied in a similar manner at 6 months in patients with delayed and normal gastric emptying measured before implantation. CONCLUSION: Taken together, these data indicate that modification of gastric sensation to distension, rather than gastric emptying, is associated with symptoms' outcome during GES.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Náusea/terapia , Umbral del Dolor/fisiología , Vómitos/terapia , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Vaciamiento Gástrico/fisiología , Gastroparesia/fisiopatología , Gastroparesia/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Náusea/etiología , Náusea/fisiopatología , Calidad de Vida , Umbral Sensorial/fisiología , Estrés Mecánico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vómitos/etiología , Vómitos/fisiopatología
8.
Dig Liver Dis ; 44(7): 563-8, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22387288

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although the efficacy of gastric electrical stimulation has been reported in short-term studies, there is a lack of data on the long-term improvement of nausea and vomiting by gastric electrical stimulation in patients with delayed or normal gastric emptying. METHODS: Thirty-one patients were implanted at our centre for medically refractory severe and chronic nausea and/or vomiting. Patients were evaluated at baseline, 6 months then 5 years after implantation (mean follow-up 80±4 months) using a symptomatic and quality of life scores. KEY RESULTS: Amongst the 31 patients, 4 were lost to follow-up, 6 explanted due to lack of improvement, and 1 patient died. Out of the 20 patients evaluated over 5 years, the quality of life score showed 27% improvement (p<0.01), including nausea (62%; p<0.01), vomiting (111%; p=0.03), satiety (158%; p<0.01), bloating (67%; p<0.01) and epigastric pain (43%; p=0.03). Over 5 years, 15/20 patients reported a 50% improvement with a global satisfaction rated at 64±6%. Therefore, 15/27 patients (56%) were improved by gastric electrical stimulation over 5 years in intention to treat. Improvement of nausea 6 months after implantation was predictive of 5-year success of gastric electrical stimulation (p=0.04). Finally, patients with delayed gastric emptying or with normal gastric emptying rate before surgery were similarly improved over 5 years (60% versus 50% respectively). CONCLUSION: Gastric electrical stimulation is safe and effective in the long term in patients with medically refractory nausea and vomiting, with an efficacy over 50% beyond 5 years in intention to treat. Gastric emptying measured before implantation did not influence the response rate over 5 years.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica , Vaciamiento Gástrico , Náusea/terapia , Estómago/fisiopatología , Vómitos/terapia , Dolor Abdominal/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tránsito Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Náusea/fisiopatología , Calidad de Vida , Saciedad/fisiología , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Factores de Tiempo , Vómitos/fisiopatología
9.
Gastroenterol Clin Biol ; 30(11): 1297-300, 2006 Nov.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17185971

RESUMEN

Peritoneal carcinomatosis has been treated by extensive cytoreduction surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). We report here our experience of 5 patients treated twice or three times by recurrent procedure of HIPEC and cytoreduction. The mortality rate was 0% and morbidity one 30%. Three patients have died at 6, 10, 18 months respectively after the second cytoreduction surgery and HIPEC, and two patients are still alive at 40 and 67 months. Our results might suggest that recurrent peritoneal carcinomatosis after cytoreduction and HIPEC, could be usefully treated by another cytoreduction and HIPEC procedure in a curative approach superior to more conventional treatments.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma/terapia , Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional/métodos , Hipertermia Inducida , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Adulto , Carcinoma/mortalidad , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/mortalidad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA