Ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation based on high density voltage mapping and complex fractionated atrial electrograms: A randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation. However, a PVI alone has been considered insufficient for persistent AF. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of persistent AF ablation targeting complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) areas within low voltage zones identified by high-resolution mapping in addition to the PVI. METHODS: We randomized 50 patients (mean age 58.4 ±â€Š9.5 years old, 86.0% males) with persistent AF to a PVI + CFAE group and PVI only group in a 1:1 ratio. CFAE and voltage mapping was performed simultaneously using a Pentaray Catheter with the CARTO3 CONFIDENSE module (Biosense Webster, CA, USA). The PVI + CFAE group, in addition to the PVI, underwent ablation targeting low voltage areas (<0.5 mV during AF) containing CFAEs. RESULTS: The mean persistent AF duration was 24.0 ±â€Š23.1 months and mean left atrial dimension 4.9 ±â€Š0.5 cm. In the PVI + CFAE group, AF converted to atrial tachycardia (AT) or sinus rhythm in 15 patients (60%) during the procedure. The PVI + CFAE group had a higher 1-year AF free survival (84.0% PVI + CFAE vs 44.0 PVI only, P = .006) without antiarrhythmic drugs. However, there was no difference in the AF/AT free survival (60.0% PVI + CFAE vs 40.0% PVI only, P = .329). CONCLUSION: Persistent AF ablation targeting CFAE areas within low voltage zones using high-density voltage mapping had a higher AF free survival than a PVI only. Although recurrence with AT was frequent in the PVI+CFAE group, the sinus rhythm maintenance rate after redo procedures was 76%.

Efficacy and Safety of Adding Omega-3 Fatty Acids in Statin-treated Patients with Residual Hypertriglyceridemia: ROMANTIC (Rosuvastatin-OMAcor iN residual hyperTrIglyCeridemia), a Randomized, Double-blind, and Placebo-controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of adding ω-3 fatty acids to rosuvastatin in patients with residual hypertriglyceridemia despite statin treatment. METHODS: This study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. After a 4-week run-in period of rosuvastatin treatment, the patients who had residual hypertriglyceridemia were randomized to receive rosuvastatin 20 mg/d plus ω-3 fatty acids 4 g/d (ROSUMEGA group) or rosuvastatin 20 mg/d (rosuvastatin group) with a 1:1 ratio and were prescribed each medication for 8 weeks. FINDINGS: A total of 201 patients were analyzed (mean [SD] age, 58.1 [10.7] years; 62.7% male). After 8 weeks of treatment, the percentage change from baseline in triglycerides (TGs) and non-HDL-C was significantly greater in the ROSUMEGA group than in the rosuvastatin group (TGs: -26.3% vs -11.4%, P < 0.001; non-HDL-C: -10.7% vs -2.2%, P = 0.001). In the linear regression analysis, the lipid-lowering effect of ω-3 fatty acids was greater when baseline TG or non-HDL-C levels were high and body mass index was low. The incidence of adverse events was not significantly different between the 2 groups. IMPLICATIONS: In patients with residual hypertriglyceridemia despite statin treatment, a combination of ω-3 fatty acids and rosuvastatin produced a greater reduction of TGs and non-HDL-C than rosuvastatin alone. Further study is needed to determine whether the advantages of this lipid profile of ω-3 fatty acids actually leads to the prevention of cardiovascular event. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03026933.