From hopelessness to some hope: A qualitative interpretive research project to improve birthing experiences in Jordan.

BACKGROUND: Many women living in Middle Eastern countries report negative, dehumanising experiences of childbirth. Finding effective ways of changing maternity care to improve women's experience is needed but is challenging. AIM: This paper explores the potential strategies to improve birthing experiences of women in Jordan and identifies the facilitators and obstacles to change. METHOD: A qualitative interpretive research design underpinned by a feminist approach was used. Seventeen community women, 14 midwives and midwifery leaders were engaged in workshops and face-to-face semi-structured interviews. Data were transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis undertaken. RESULTS: An overarching theme "From hopelessness to some hope" emerged from data analysis and comprised of two themes: 'It's hopeless-there are so many obstacles'; and 'Finding some hope for the way forward'. The community women were unhappy with the current maternity services but accepted the situation. Midwives offered explanations for the way women are treated, including that women have no voice. For these participants, the obstacles seemed almost insurmountable; however, there was some hope expressed about potential for small changes to occur. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the value of women and midwives sharing experiences and listening to the stories of women. Listening to women's birth stories may also be an important element of undergraduate and continuing education in Jordan. Small changes, such as promoting women's dignity by ensuring they are covered during birth are possible, but real change needs to be generated at a professional and societal level.

The barriers and facilitators to evidence-based episiotomy practice in Jordan.

AIM: This paper examines the barriers to evidence-based episiotomy practice in Jordan and identifies strategies that may be effective in introducing evidence-based practice. BACKGROUND: Episiotomy is routinely undertaken during birth in many parts of the world, including in the Middle East with little scientific evidence of benefit. There is a paucity of research examining the underlying drivers for episiotomy rates, and why they are higher in some countries. METHOD: This study, conducted in Jordan, used a quality improvement approach and comprised three phases. In phase one, a retrospective file review of 300 births was conducted. In phase two, 15 face-to-face interviews were conducted with 10 midwives and five key stakeholders (managers and doctors). A feedback and discussion session using the audit and review model was conducted in phase three with 23 health professionals to identify strategies to reduce the episiotomy rate. RESULTS: The episiotomy rate was 41.4% overall (91% of primiparous women and 24% of multiparous women). Six major themes emerged from the thematic analysis of data: 'Policy: written but invisible and unwritten and assumed'; 'the safest way'; 'doctors set the rules'; 'midwives swimming with the tide; 'uncooperative and uninformed women' and 'the way forward'. CONCLUSIONS: Non-evidence based episiotomy practices are widely used during birth in this Jordanian hospital and numerous barriers to change exist. Medical professionals dictate childbirth practice and midwives fear recrimination if they go against the 'unwritten policy'. Strategies to change practice include development of evidence-based information for women, education of midwives and doctors, and policy review.