Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Cancer Res ; 28(3): 441-445, 2022 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34417198

RESUMEN

On March 10, 2021, the FDA granted regular approval to tivozanib for treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) following two or more prior systemic therapies. Approval was based on the TIVO-3 study, a randomized trial of tivozanib versus sorafenib in patients with R/R advanced RCC. In TIVO-3, patients were randomized to receive either tivozanib 1.34 mg orally once daily for 21 consecutive days of every 28-day cycle or sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1. Tivozanib demonstrated efficacy compared with sorafenib with an improvement in PFS [HR, 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.56-0.95; P = 0.016]. The estimated median PFS was 5.6 months and 3.9 months in the tivozanib and sorafenib arms, respectively. There was no evidence of a detrimental effect on overall survival: HR, 0.97 (95% CI, 0.75-1.24). The most common grade 3 to 4 adverse reaction on the tivozanib arm was hypertension (24%). Compared with sorafenib, tivozanib was associated with lower rates of grade 3 to 4 diarrhea, rash, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia. Patients receiving tivozanib in TIVO-3 had lower rates of dose reduction, interruption, or permanent discontinuation than those receiving sorafenib.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Aprobación de Drogas , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Fenilurea/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Sorafenib/administración & dosificación , Sorafenib/uso terapéutico , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Malawi Med J ; 34(1): 25-30, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37265822

RESUMEN

Background: There is a growing interest in medicinal plants in recent years due to their many therapeutic benefits and low side effects. Among the medicinal plants is the African Adansonia digitata (baobab) that has edible fruit. In the current study, the effect of A. digitata juice consumption on the lipid profile was investigated. In addition, inhibition of the oxidation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in-vitro by A. digitata essential oil (EO) was also investigated. Methods: In this cohort study, a total of 70 subjects of A. digitata users (AD group, 42 male and 28 female) and 70 non A. digitata users (Non-AD group, 44 male and 26 female) were recruited to participate in this study. We evaluated lipid profile, HbA1c, liver/kidney functions, and phytosterol contents in fasting blood samples of all participants. Results: The present findings illustrated significantly lower levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL in the AD group compared to Non-AD (p < 0.01). In addition, essential oil of A. digitata inhibited LDL oxidation in-vitro as shown by the significant decreases in the formation of malonaldehyde (MDA), protein carbonyl (PC), and lipid hydroperoxide (LHP) (P<0.05). No significant changes in fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, HDL, kidney function, and liver function enzymes between the two groups were detected (P>0.05). Conclusion: The juice of A. digitata has hypolipidemic and antioxidative effects and might be beneficial for the management of lipid levels in the body.


Asunto(s)
Adansonia , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Hemoglobina Glucada , Colesterol , Lípidos
3.
Clin Cancer Res ; 22(18): 4545-9, 2016 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27401247

RESUMEN

On December 11, 2015, the FDA approved uridine triacetate (VISTOGARD; Wellstat Therapeutics Corporation) for the emergency treatment of adult and pediatric patients following a fluorouracil or capecitabine overdose regardless of the presence of symptoms, and of those who exhibit early-onset, severe, or life-threatening toxicity affecting the cardiac or central nervous system, and/or early onset, unusually severe adverse reactions (e.g., gastrointestinal toxicity and/or neutropenia) within 96 hours following the end of fluorouracil or capecitabine administration. Uridine triacetate is not recommended for the nonemergent treatment of adverse reactions associated with fluorouracil or capecitabine because it may diminish the efficacy of these drugs, and the safety and efficacy of uridine triacetate initiated more than 96 hours following the end of administration of these drugs has not been established. The approval is based on data from two single-arm, open-label, expanded-access trials in 135 patients receiving uridine triacetate (10 g or 6.2 g/m(2) orally every 6 hours for 20 doses) for fluorouracil or capecitabine overdose, or who exhibited severe or life-threatening toxicities within 96 hours following the end of fluorouracil or capecitabine administration. Ninety-six percent of patients met the major efficacy outcome measure, which was survival at 30 days or survival until the resumption of chemotherapy, if prior to 30 days. The most common adverse reactions were vomiting, nausea, and diarrhea. This article summarizes the FDA review of this New Drug Application, the data supporting approval of uridine triacetate, and the unique regulatory situations encountered by this approval. Clin Cancer Res; 22(18); 4545-49. ©2016 AACR.


Asunto(s)
Acetatos/farmacología , Acetatos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Aprobación de Drogas , Neoplasias/terapia , Uridina/análogos & derivados , Acetatos/química , Animales , Antineoplásicos/química , Capecitabina/administración & dosificación , Capecitabina/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Humanos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Uso Excesivo de Medicamentos Recetados , Proyectos de Investigación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration , Uridina/química , Uridina/farmacología , Uridina/uso terapéutico
4.
Clin Cancer Res ; 21(19): 4257-61, 2015 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26187614

RESUMEN

On December 19, 2014, the FDA approved olaparib capsules (Lynparza; AstraZeneca) for the treatment of patients with deleterious or suspected deleterious germline BRCA-mutated (gBRCAm) advanced ovarian cancer who have been treated with three or more prior lines of chemotherapy. The BRACAnalysis CDx (Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc.) was approved concurrently. An international multicenter, single-arm trial enrolled 137 patients with measurable gBRCAm-associated ovarian cancer treated with three or more prior lines of chemotherapy. Patients received olaparib at a dose of 400 mg by mouth twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The objective response rate (ORR) was 34% with median response duration of 7.9 months in this cohort. The most common adverse reactions (≥20%) in patients treated with olaparib were anemia, nausea, fatigue (including asthenia), vomiting, diarrhea, dysgeusia, dyspepsia, headache, decreased appetite, nasopharyngitis/pharyngitis/upper respiratory infection, cough, arthralgia/musculoskeletal pain, myalgia, back pain, dermatitis/rash, and abdominal pain/discomfort. Myelodysplatic syndrome and/or acute myeloid leukemia occurred in 2% of the patients enrolled on this trial.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Aprobación de Drogas , Genes BRCA1 , Genes BRCA2 , Mutación de Línea Germinal , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Ftalazinas/uso terapéutico , Piperazinas/uso terapéutico , United States Food and Drug Administration , Animales , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Ftalazinas/farmacología , Piperazinas/farmacología , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/farmacología , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
5.
Clin Cancer Res ; 20(19): 4994-5000, 2014 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25096067

RESUMEN

On August 17, 2011, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved vemurafenib tablets (Zelboraf, Hoffmann-LaRoche Inc.) for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with the BRAF(V600E) mutation as detected by an FDA-approved test. The cobas 4800 BRAF V600 Mutation Test (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.) was approved concurrently. An international, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial in 675 previously untreated patients with BRAF(V600E) mutation-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma allocated 337 patients to receive vemurafenib, 960 mg orally twice daily, and 338 patients to receive dacarbazine, 1,000 mg/m(2) intravenously every 3 weeks. Overall survival was significantly improved in patients receiving vemurafenib [HR, 0.44; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.33-0.59; P < 0.0001]. Progression-free survival was also significantly improved in patients receiving vemurafenib (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.20-0.33; P < 0.0001). Overall response rates were 48.4% and 5.5% in the vemurafenib and dacarbazine arms, respectively. The most common adverse reactions (≥30%) in patients treated with vemurafenib were arthralgia, rash, alopecia, fatigue, photosensitivity reaction, and nausea. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas or keratoacanthomas were detected in approximately 24% of patients treated with vemurafenib. Other adverse reactions included hypersensitivity, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, uveitis, QT prolongation, and liver enzyme laboratory abnormalities.


Asunto(s)
Aprobación de Drogas , Indoles , Sulfonamidas , United States Food and Drug Administration , Animales , Antineoplásicos/química , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Humanos , Indoles/química , Indoles/farmacología , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Melanoma/genética , Melanoma/mortalidad , Melanoma/patología , Mutación , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Sulfonamidas/química , Sulfonamidas/farmacología , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Vemurafenib
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA