Evaluation of shoseiryuto for seasonal allergic rhinitis, using an environmental challenge chamber.

Background: Complementary and alternative medicine, including Japanese traditional medicine (JTM), has been used for various allergic diseases, but the evidence is limited. Shoseiryuto (Xiao-Qing-Long-Tang), one of the representative JTM drugs, is frequently used to treat allergic rhinitis (AR). However, its efficacy for seasonal AR has not been fully established. Using an Environmental challenge chamber (ECC), we evaluated the therapeutic effects of shoseiryuto on AR induced by Japanese cedar pollen (JCP). Methods: A placebo-controlled double-blind crossover study with shoseiryuto was conducted using the ECC. The shoseiryuto or placebo was orally administered from 2 weeks before the exposure test. The pollen exposure test was conducted for 3 h, and the pollen concentration was set at 8000 pollen/m3. The primary endpoint of the study was the total nasal symptom score (TNSS) during pollen exposure. A physician certified by the Japanese Society of Oriental Medicine as a specialist checked each participant's "pattern", a comprehensive expression of signs obtained from individual patients' subjective symptoms and other personal findings. Blood samples collected just before the first pollen exposure were stimulated with cedar antigens and used for immunological studies. Results: The results of the 46 participants were analyzed, and no significant side effects were detected. There was no significant difference in TNSS during pollen exposure for 3 h in the ECC between the shoseiryuto and placebo groups. However, some symptoms were improved in the shoseiryuto group after leaving the ECC. There was no significant correlation between the "fluid retention pattern" and TNSS. In immunological studies, shoseiryuto did not inhibit Th2-type cytokine production and mRNA expression. Conclusions: Oral administration of shoseiryuto from 2 weeks before pollen exposure did not prevent or inhibit immediate symptoms of AR induced by JCP in the ECC. Further study is needed to reevaluate the shoseiryuto specific "pattern" in JTM.

Technical standards in allergen exposure chambers worldwide - an EAACI Task Force Report.

Allergen exposure chambers (AECs) can be used for controlled exposure to allergenic and non-allergenic airborne particles in an enclosed environment, in order to (i) characterize the pathological features of respiratory diseases and (ii) contribute to and accelerate the clinical development of pharmacological treatments and allergen immunotherapy for allergic disease of the respiratory tract (such as allergic rhinitis, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and allergic asthma). In the guidelines of the European Medicines Agency for the clinical development of products for allergen immunotherapy (AIT), the role of AECs in determining primary endpoints in dose-finding Phase II trials is emphasized. Although methodologically insulated from the variability of natural pollen exposure, chamber models remain confined to supporting secondary, rather than primary, endpoints in Phase III registration trials. The need for further validation in comparison with field exposure is clearly mandated. On this basis, the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) initiated a Task Force in 2015 charged to gain a better understanding of how AECs can generate knowledge about respiratory allergies and can contribute to the clinical development of treatments. Researchers working with AECs worldwide were asked to provide technical information in eight sections: (i) dimensions and structure of the AEC, (ii) AEC staff, (iii) airflow, air processing, and operating conditions, (iv) particle dispersal, (v) pollen/particle counting, (vi) safety and non-contamination measures, (vii) procedures for symptom assessments, (viii) tested allergens/substances and validation procedures. On this basis, a minimal set of technical requirements for AECs applied to the field of allergology is proposed.

Efficacy of Desloratadine and Levocetirizine in Patients with Cedar Pollen-Induced Allergic Rhinitis: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study.

BACKGROUND: No comparative study of antihistamines that differ in structural system has been conducted in allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: This was a randomized, double-blind, crossover comparative study to verify the efficacy of antihistamines that differ in structural system. METHODS: A total of 50 patients with moderate or more severe Japanese cedar pollen-induced allergic rhinitis were randomized to receive either placebo, desloratadine 5 mg (a tricyclic), or levocetirizine 5 mg (a piperazine). One dose of the study drug was orally administered at 9 pm on the day before a pollen exposure test, which was performed for 3 h (9 a.m. to 12 p.m.) to assess symptoms in an environmental challenge chamber (ECC). Nasal and ocular symptoms were compared at an airborne pollen level of 8,000 grains/m3. The primary endpoint was mean total nasal symptom score (TNSS) from 120 to 180 min in the ECC. Subjects with a difference of ≥1 in TNSS between 2 drugs were extracted to the relevant drug-responsive group. RESULTS: The difference in TNSS from placebo was -2.42 (p < 0.0001) with levocetirizine and -1.66 (p < 0.01) with desloratadine, showing that both drugs were significantly more effective than placebo in controlling symptoms, but with no statistically significant difference between the 2 drugs. There were 12 subjects in the desloratadine-responsive group and 24 subjects in the levocetirizine-responsive group, with no contributor to response was detected. CONCLUSION: Levocetirizine tended to control nasal symptoms more effectively than desloratadine. However, the response to each antihistamine varied among individuals and the predictors to the response are unknown. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN ID: UMIN000029653.

The Relationship of Pollen Dispersal with Allergy Symptoms and Immunotherapy: Allergen Immunotherapy Improves Symptoms in the Late Period of Japanese Cedar Pollen Dispersal.

BACKGROUND: The severity of symptoms of pollen-induced allergic rhinitis is affected by the amount of scattered pollen. However, the relationships between the pollen dispersal pattern, symptom severity, and treatment efficacy are not clear. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2012, we performed 4 randomized, placebo-controlled studies of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) on patients with Japanese cedar-induced allergic rhinitis who lived in or around Chiba, Japan. The participants were asked to avoid using rescue medicines during the cedar pollen season as much as possible and to record their nasal symptoms in allergy diaries. The amount of pollen dispersed daily was quantified using the Durham method, and the season was divided into early and late periods based on the pollen count. RESULTS: A total of 721 patients were enrolled in the 4 studies during the 6-year study period. In the placebo group (n = 349), a correlation was observed between the amount of pollen dispersed and the severity of symptoms in the early but not late period of pollen dispersal. Treatment with SLIT (n = 372) significantly improved symptom severity in the late but not early period. CONCLUSION: For patients with Japanese cedar pollen-induced allergic rhinitis, the fluctuation of daily pollen dispersal had a minimal effect on the severity of symptoms during the late period. SLIT was remarkably effective in alleviating symptoms during this period but not in the early period.

Complementary and alternative medicine for allergic rhinitis in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is extensively used in patients with allergic diseases worldwide. The purpose of this study was to investigate the actual situation of CAM practice in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. METHODS: We distributed questionnaires to otolaryngologists at 114 facilities in Japan. The subjects who participated in this study included children <16 years of age and adults ≥16 years of age diagnosed with allergic rhinitis by otolaryngologists. The survey was performed in the period from September 2007 to August 2009. Furthermore, we performed the same investigation out of the hospital setting, such as during general health examinations. All questionnaires were returned to Chiba University and analyzed. RESULTS: The proportions of patients who had ever experimented with CAM in the hospital survey were 7.1% (225/3170) and 19.2% (1416/7363) of children and adults, respectively. Approximately 36.2% of the adult patients thought that the treatments were effective. The main reasons for CAM use were safety, convenience and low price. However, the group who spent more than $1000 on CAM felt more dissatisfaction and anxiety related to treatment at the hospital. The situation of CAM practice was not consistent and was instead influenced by the backgrounds of the subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients who receive CAM report feeling that the effects of treatment provided by hospitals are insufficient and have concerns about the side effects of such treatments. Information regarding standard treatments, as described in the guidelines, should become widely known and diffused, and strong communication with patients should be considered.

Persistent nasal symptoms and mediator release after continuous pollen exposure in an environmental challenge chamber.

BACKGROUND: Immediate- and late-phase reactions are associated with nasal symptoms of patients with allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: To examine the symptoms and mediators released after continuous allergen exposure in an environmental challenge chamber (ECC). METHODS: Fifteen patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis were enrolled in this study and continuously exposed to cedar pollen at a concentration of 8,000 grains/m(3) for 3 hours in an ECC. Nasal function tests were performed, and nasal secretions were collected before pollen exposure (0 hour), immediately after exiting the ECC (3 hours), and 6 hours after exiting the ECC (9 hours). Symptom scores were recorded every 30 minutes in the ECC and every 3 hours after exiting the ECC. The frequency of sneezing and nose blowing also was monitored. RESULTS: The severity of symptoms in the ECC peaked approximately 2 hours after the beginning of pollen exposure and continued more than 6 hours after leaving the ECC. Concentrations of histamine, tryptase, interleukins 5, 3, 33, and 31, and substance P increased over time, whereas that of nasal fractional exhaled nitric oxide decreased. CONCLUSION: Various mediators are released during continuous allergen exposure, which subsequently induce persistent nasal symptoms. Effective treatment is required to control the intense inflammation observed after allergen exposure.

Characteristics of the Chiba environmental challenge chamber.

BACKGROUND: An environmental challenge chamber (ECC), which we refer to as the α-chamber, was built at Chiba University in 2008. The aim of this study was to validate the functionality of the ECC. METHODS: The stability of the pollen distribution and concentration in the ECC and symptoms of patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis induced by cedar pollen exposure were examined. Carryover effects of symptoms induced by different exposure protocols and correlations between symptoms induced in the ECC and those in the natural cedar pollen season were also determined. All the studies using the α-chamber were conducted out of the cedar pollen season. RESULTS: The severity of symptoms in the chamber reached a peak about 2 hours after the start of pollen exposure and plateaued thereafter. After subjects left the chamber, the symptoms persisted for several days. There was no significant difference between the severity of symptoms at exposure levels of 8000 and 12000 grains/m3. The symptoms were significantly increased by exposure for 3 consecutive days; however, there were no carryover effects in a study performed with a two-week interval. The total nasal symptom score (TNSS) in the natural pollen season showed a weak correlation with the mean TNSS on the day of exposure and the following 3 days. Symptoms in the ECC also had weak correlations with those in the early natural pollen season. CONCLUSIONS: The ECC under well-controlled conditions is suitable for clinical studies and might accelerate development of treatment for seasonal allergic rhinitis. A complete evaluation requires inclusion of the persistent reaction after subjects leave the ECC.