Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 102(34): e34779, 2023 Aug 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37653754

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Acute radiodermatitis is a significant complication of cancer radiotherapy, and platelet-based therapies are emerging as potential new treatments. MAIN SYMPTOMS AND IMPORTANT CLINICAL FINDINGS: In this report, we present the case of a patient with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy combined with the monoclonal antibody cetuximab. After 4 weeks of this treatment, the patient developed cutaneous radiation dermatitis. Despite receiving standard treatment with corticosteroids and emollient cream, the lesion did not improve. MAIN DIAGNOSIS: cutaneous radiation dermatitis on head and neck cancer patient. THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTIONS: Topical application of platelet gel was initiated on the wound. From the second week of radiotherapy to the 4th week, homologous platelet-rich plasma was applied on the dermatitis using a bandage, 4 times a day. OUTCOMES: The topical treatment with homologous platelet gel resulted in complete healing of the radiodermatitis, including restoration of the epidermis, reepithelialization, and reduction in associated pain. CONCLUSION: homologous platelet gel might be an alternative to standard treatment of radiation dermatitis.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos , Cetuximab , Terapias Complementarias , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas , Radiodermatitis , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello , Radiodermatitis/etiología , Radiodermatitis/terapia , Cetuximab/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/radioterapia , Plaquetas , Geles , Terapias Complementarias/métodos
2.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 199(6): 554-564, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36732443

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The rates of local failure after curative radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PC) remain high despite more accurate locoregional treatments available, with one third of patients experiencing biochemical failure and clinical relapse occurring in 30-47% of cases. Today, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the treatment of choice in this setting, but with not negligible toxicity and low effects on local disease. Therefore, the treatment of intraprostatic PC recurrence represents a challenge for radiation oncologists. Prostate reirradiation (Re-I) might be a therapeutic possibility. We present our series of patients treated with salvage stereotactic Re­I for intraprostatic recurrence of PC after radical radiotherapy, with the aim of evaluating feasibility and safety of linac-based prostate Re­I. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated toxicities and outcomes of patients who underwent salvage reirradiation using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for intraprostatic PC recurrence. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, histologically proven diagnosis of PC, salvage Re­I for intraprostatic recurrence after primary radiotherapy for PC with curative intent, concurrent/adjuvant ADT with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) allowed, performance status ECOG 0-2, restaging choline/PSMA-PET/TC and prostate MRI after biochemical recurrence, and signed informed consent. RESULTS: From January 2019 to April 2022, 20 patients were recruited. Median follow-up was 26.7 months (range 7-50). After SBRT, no patients were lost at follow-up and all are still alive. One- and 2­year progression free survival (PFS) was 100% and 81.5%, respectively, while 2­year biochemical progression-free survival (bFFS) was 88.9%. Four patients (20%) experienced locoregional lymph node progression and were treated with a further course of SBRT. Prostate reirradiation allowed the ADT start to be postponed for 12-39 months. Re­I was well tolerated by all patients and none discontinued the treatment. No cases of ≥ G3 genitourinary (GU) or gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were reported. Seven (35%) and 2 (10%) patients experienced acute G1 and G2 GU toxicity, respectively. Late GU toxicity was recorded in 10 (50%) patients, including 8 (40%) G1 and 2 (10%) G2. ADT-related side effects were found in 7 patients (hot flashes and asthenia). CONCLUSION: Linac-based SBRT is a safe technique for performing Re­I for intraprostatic recurrence after primary curative radiotherapy for PC. Future prospective, randomized studies are desirable to better understand the effectiveness of reirradiation and the still open questions in this field.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Radiocirugia , Reirradiación , Masculino , Humanos , Adolescente , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Próstata/efectos de la radiación , Reirradiación/efectos adversos , Reirradiación/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Radiocirugia/métodos , Terapia Recuperativa/métodos
3.
Curr Oncol ; 29(3): 1866-1876, 2022 03 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35323352

RESUMEN

Adenoid cystic carcinoma/basaloid cell carcinoma of the prostate (ACC/BCC) is a very rare variant of prostate cancer with uncertain behavior. Few cases are reported in the literature. Data on treatment options are scarce. The aim of our work was to retrospectively review the published reports. Thirty-three case reports or case series were analyzed (106 patients in total). Pathological features, management, and follow-up information were evaluated. Despite the relatively low level of evidence given the unavoidable lack of prospective trials for such a rare prostate tumor, the following considerations were made: prostate ACC/BCC is an aggressive tumor often presenting with locally advanced disease and incidental diagnosis occurs during transurethral resection of the prostate for urinary obstructive symptoms. Prostate-specific antigen was not a reliable marker for diagnosis nor follow-up. Adequate staging with Computed Tomography (CT) scan and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) should be performed before treatment and during follow-up, while there is no evidence for the use of Positron Emission Tomography (PET). Radical surgery with negative margins and possibly adjuvant radiotherapy appear to be the treatments of choice. The response to androgen deprivation therapy was poor. Currently, there is no evidence of the use of truly effective systemic therapies.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Adenoide Quístico , Carcinoma Basocelular , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata , Antagonistas de Andrógenos , Carcinoma Adenoide Quístico/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Adenoide Quístico/patología , Carcinoma Adenoide Quístico/terapia , Carcinoma Basocelular/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA