Grass pollen immunotherapy inhibits seasonal increases in basophils and eosinophils in the nasal epithelium.

BACKGROUND: Symptoms of allergic rhinitis are accompanied by infiltration of the nasal mucosa with inflammatory cells, predominantly eosinophils and metachromatic cells (basophils and mast cells). Specific immunotherapy (IT) reduces mucosal eosinophilia and numbers of metachromatic cells in the epithelium. A specific marker distinguishing basophils from mast cells was recently developed. OBJECTIVES: The basophil-specific monoclonal antibody 2D7 was used to determine the influence of subcutaneous IT on numbers of nasal mucosal basophils compared with the effects of IT on neutrophils, eosinophils and mast cells. METHOD: During a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of grass pollen IT in 44 adults with severe summer hay fever, nasal biopsies were taken at baseline, out of the pollen season, and at the peak of the pollen season following 2 years treatment. Biopsies were processed for immunohistochemistry for basophils (2D7+), mast cells (AA1+), eosinophils (MBP+) and neutrophils (neutrophil elastase+). RESULTS: In placebo-treated (PL) patients there were significant seasonal increases in basophils (P < 0.01), mast cells (P < 0.05) and eosinophils (P = 0.002) in the nasal submucosa. In IT-treated patients significant increases in 2D7+ cells (P < 0.01) and eosinophils (P = 0.01) but not AA1+ cells (P = 0.9) were observed. These differences were significant between groups for eosinophils (P < 0.05). In the epithelium there were seasonal increases in AA1+ cells and eosinophils in both groups (PL: P < 0.01, IT: P < 0.05 for both). The between-group difference was significant for eosinophils (P = 0.05). Basophils were observed in the epithelium of six out of 17 in the placebo group and one out of 20 in the IT group (P = 0.03). Neutrophil numbers remained constant in both epithelium and submucosa. CONCLUSION: Successful grass pollen immunotherapy was associated with inhibition of seasonal increases in basophils and eosinophils, but not mast cells or neutrophils within the nasal epithelium. Immunotherapy may act, at least in part, by reducing seasonal recruitment of basophils and eosinophils into the epithelium.

Immunohistochemical detection of human basophils in late-phase skin reactions.

BACKGROUND: Human basophils are difficult to detect with classic histochemical stains at sites of allergic inflammation. The 2D7 anti-basophil monoclonal antibody was used to identify basophils in skin during the late-phase response to a cutaneous allergen challenge. METHODS: The 2D7 monoclonal antibody was used on protease-digested sections of skin biopsy specimens obtained 6 and 24 hours after an allergen or buffer challenge. The skin chamber technique was used to compare buffer- and allergen-challenged sites at 6 hours, and intradermal injection of allergen was used to compare allergen-challenged sites at 6 and 24 hours. RESULTS: Dramatic increases in the numbers of 2D7+ cells and in tissue staining by 2D7 were observed 6 hours after allergen challenge compared with buffer challenge. Histamine levels in skin chamber fluid varied with 2D7+ cell concentrations. By 24 hours, 2D7+ cells and tissue staining appeared to diminish but were still detectable in the allergen-challenged sites. Basophils localized primarily in and around blood vessels, whereas mast cells remained mostly in the superficial dermis. Mast cells were 2D7- in both the allergen- and buffer-challenged skin. Metachromatic staining of 2D7+ basophils with toluidine blue was absent in these tissue sections. CONCLUSIONS: The 2D7 monoclonal antibody provides a more sensitive and precise marker than histochemical staining for human basophil involvement during the late-phase response to an allergen challenge. Basophil infiltration was observed at 6 hours only after allergen challenge and persisted at similar levels by 24 hours.