Impact of Tumor Grade Distribution on Genetic Alterations in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: A genomic analysis based on next-generation sequencing is important for deciding cancer treatment strategies. Cancer tissue sometimes displays intratumor heterogeneity and a pathologic specimen may contain more than two tumor grades. Although tumor grades are very important for the cancer prognosis, the impact of higher tumor grade distribution in a specimen used for a genomic analysis is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 61 clear cell carcinoma and 46 prostate cancer patients that were diagnosed between December 2018 and August 2022 using the GeneRead Human Comprehensive Cancer Panel or SureSelect PrePool custom Tier2. Genome annotation and curation were performed using the GenomeJack software. RESULTS: Tumor mutation burden (TMB) was increased in proportion to the higher tumor grade distribution in grade 2 clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). In PC, Grade Group 3/4 specimens that included an increased distribution of Gleason pattern 4 had more frequent gene mutations. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest the importance of selecting the maximum distribution of higher tumor grade areas to obtain results on the precise gene alterations for genomics-focused treatments.

Treatment outcomes and late toxicities of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for 1091 Japanese patients with localized prostate cancer.

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the treatment result of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in a large number of Japanese patients with prostate cancer. BACKGROUND: A total of 1091 patients with localized prostate cancer were recruited between March 2006 and July 2014. The patients were stratified into low- (n = 205 [18.8%]), intermediate- (n = 450 [41.2%]), high- (n = 345 [31.6%]), and very high-risk (n = 91 [8.3%]) groups according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network classification. All patients were irradiated via IMRT at a dose of 74-78 Gy with or without androgen-deprivation therapy. The mean follow-up period was 50 months (range, 2-120 months). RESULTS: The biochemical failure-free rate (BFFR), the clinical failure-free rate, and the overall survival rate at the 5-year follow-up for all patients was 91.3%, 96.2%, and 99.1%, respectively. In univariate analysis, the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (≤20 vs. >20 ng/ml) were significantly correlated with BFFR. A trend toward higher BFFR was noted in patients with a Gleason score (GS) of ≤7 than in patients with GS ≥8. In multivariate analysis, only PSA (≤20 vs. >20 ng/ml) was significantly correlated with BFFR. The cumulative incidence rate of gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity (≥grade 2) at the 5-year follow-up was 11.4% and 4.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study indicate that IMRT is well tolerated and is associated with both good long-term tumor control and excellent outcomes in patients with localized prostate cancer.

Comparison of two alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonists, naftopidil and tamsulosin hydrochloride, in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized crossover study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of two alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists, alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor-selective tamsulosin hydrochloride and alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor-selective naftopidil, in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients (mean age 72.4 years, sd 4.3, range 66-79) with LUTS (International Prostate Symptom Score, IPSS >8) secondary to BPH were enrolled in a randomized crossover study. Seventeen patients were initially prescribed naftopidil 50 mg for 4 weeks, followed by tamsulosin 0.2 mg for 4 weeks (group A); another 17 were initially prescribed tamsulosin 0.2 mg, followed by naftopidil 50 mg (group B). Patients changed to the alternative treatment after a 1-week washout period. Efficacy criteria were improvement in LUTS (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), uroflowmetry, and pressure-flow study (PFS) values based on the treatment with each agent. RESULTS: At baseline there were no significant differences between the groups in IPSS, QoL, uroflowmetry values or PFS values, except for the volume at maximum desire to void. After treatment with each agent, the IPSS and QoL were significantly improved and the reduction in bladder outlet obstruction confirmed by PFS. Naftopidil was significantly more effective than tamsulosin in relieving nocturia. The increases from baseline (before treatment) to the endpoint (after treatment with each agent) in the volume at first desire and maximum desire to void were significantly higher with naftopidil than with tamsulosin. Involuntary contractions disappeared in two patients with relief of nocturia with naftopidil, but not with tamsulosin. The decrease in other symptoms of the IPSS, QoL, increase in uroflowmetry values and changes in other PFS values were similar for both agents. CONCLUSIONS: The two agents provided similar efficacy in the treatment of LUTS with BPH. However, naftopidil was better than tamsulosin for nocturia. The disappearance of involuntary contraction and the greater increase in first-desire volume with naftopidil may be associated with the relief of nocturia. The alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor antagonist is effective in alleviating both voiding and storage symptoms. The alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor antagonist may be more effective than the alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor antagonist in LUTS with BPH.

Treatment of uncomplicated gonococcal urethritis by double-dosing of 200 mg cefixime at a 6-h interval.

The efficacy of antimicrobial regimens for the treatment of uncomplicated gonococcal urethritis depends partially upon the period of time (therapeutic time) during which the drug concentration in the blood after the concentration peak is greater than four times the minimum inhibitory concentration for 90% of clinical isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae (MIC(90)). A therapeutic time of at least 10 h is suggested as an important determinant for elimination of 95% or more of the infection. In this study, therapeutic times for a single 400-mg dose of cefixime at various MIC(90)s were calculated, and pharmacokinetic profiles of double-dosing of 200 mg cefixime at various intervals were simulated. Subsequently, a dosing interval of 6 h was tested in 6 healthy Japanese men, and then 93 Japanese men with gonococcal urethritis were treated with a regimen of two 200-mg doses of cefixime given at a 6-h interval. For a single dose of 400 mg cefixime, therapeutic times were calculated to be 12.8, 9.1, 5.4, and 1.7 h for MIC(90)s of 0.06, 0.125, 0.25, and 0.5 microg/ml, respectively. In the simulation study of double-dosing of 200 mg cefixime at a 6-h interval, the therapeutic times for the MIC(90)s of < or =0.125 microg/ml were longer than 10 h. Of the 93 patients, 68 were evaluated for microbiological outcome, and N. gonorrhoeae was eradicated in 60 (88.2%). The MIC(90) of cefixime for the 61 isolates tested was 0.125 microg/ml. All strains with MICs of < or =0.06 microg/ml were eradicated, whereas 8 of 16 strains with MICs of > or =0.125 microg/ml persisted after treatment. This regimen would not be effective against infection by strains exhibiting cefixime MIC(90)s of > or =0.125 microg/ml. For such strains, a different regimen with a higher dose of cefixime would be required.