Comparison Between Contact Force Monitoring and Unipolar Signal Modification as a Guide for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Prospective Multi-Center Randomized Study.

BACKGROUND: Both contact force monitoring (CFM) and unipolar signal modification (USM) are guides for ablation, which improve the efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation of atrial fibrillation. We sought to compare the outcomes of atrial fibrillation ablation guided by CFM or USM. METHODS: A total of 136 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation underwent a circumferential pulmonary vein isolation using CF sensing ablation catheters and were randomly assigned to undergo catheter ablation guided by either CFM (CFM-guided group: n=70) or USM (USM-guided group: n=66). In the USM-guided group, each radiofrequency application lasted until the development of completely positive unipolar electrograms. In the CFM-guided group, a CF of 20 g (range, 10-30 g) and minimum force-time integral of 400 g were the targets for each radiofrequency application. The primary end point was freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence without antiarrhythmic drugs at 12-months of follow-up. RESULTS: The cumulative freedom from recurrences at 12-months was 85% in the USM-guided group and 70% in the CFM-guided group (P=0.031). The incidence of time-dependent and ATP-provoked early electrical reconnections between the left atrium and PVs, procedural time, fluoroscopic time, and average force-time integral, did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. The radiofrequency time for the pulmonary vein isolation was shorter in the USM-guided group than CFM-guided group but was not statistically significant (P=0.077). CONCLUSIONS: USM was superior to CFM as an end point for radiofrequency energy deliveries during the pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in terms of the 12-month recurrence-free rate. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm. Unique identifier: UMIN000021127.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor facilitates the angiogenesis induced by ultrasonic microbubble destruction.

Ultrasonic destruction of microbubbles (US/MB) in the microcirculation causes local inflammatory cell infiltration, which has been shown to induce angiogenesis. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), which mobilizes myelomonocytic cells from the bone marrow and enhances vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) release from these cells, has also been applied to therapeutic angiogenesis induction. In the present study, we sought to examine the potential of G-CSF pretreatment to enhance the angiogenic effect of US/MB. Ischemic hindlimbs in mice were treated with either a predetermined minimal effective dose (300 mug/kg) of G-CSF, US/MB alone or G-CSF pretreatment followed by US/MB at seven days after removal of the femoral artery. Ultrasonic destruction of microbubbles was performed as intermittent pulsed local insonation using a diagnostic ultrasound scanner at a peak negative pressure of 1.4 MPa after intravenous injection of perfluorocarbon microbubbles. At 21 days after the treatment, we quantified the surface vascularity using a grid method and the capillary density using an alkaline phosphatase stain. Relative to the capillary density in normal muscle, the capillary density in the treated limbs was restored to 74 +/- 13% by G-CSF alone and 90 +/- 20% by US/MB alone (p < 0.05 vs. both untreated and G-CSF alone), and further increased to 101 +/- 21% by G-CSF pretreatment. The collateral growth induced by the combination of G-CSF pretreatment and US/MB was 2.8- and 1.4-fold greater than the growth induced by G-CSF alone and US/MB alone, respectively (p < 0.05 for both). Thus, pretreatment with a single minimal effective dose of G-CSF can augment the angiogenic effect of US/MB.