Optimized implementation of cardiac resynchronization therapy: a call for action for referral and optimization of care: A joint position statement from the Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) of the European Society of Cardiology.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is one of the most effective therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and leads to improved quality of life, reductions in heart failure hospitalization rates and all-cause mortality. Nevertheless, up to two-thirds of eligible patients are not referred for CRT. Furthermore, post-implantation follow-up is often fragmented and suboptimal, hampering the potential maximal treatment effect. This joint position statement from three European Society of Cardiology Associations, Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), focuses on optimized implementation of CRT. We offer theoretical and practical strategies to achieve more comprehensive CRT referral and post-procedural care by focusing on four actionable domains: (i) overcoming CRT under-utilization, (ii) better understanding of pre-implant characteristics, (iii) abandoning the term 'non-response' and replacing this by the concept of disease modification, and (iv) implementing a dedicated post-implant CRT care pathway.

His bundle pacing: troubleshooting at implantation.

His bundle pacing produces electrocardiograms (ECGs) that give the impression that it is physiological like no other form of cardiac pacing requiring ventricular stimulation. Several special features of the implantation technique of a His bundle lead that distinguish it significantly from the implantation of other endocardial leads need to be considered. This overview provides a number of practical "hands-on" tips and tricks, from implantation set-up (12-lead ECG, no electrophysiology unit, no His bundle catheter), venous access, handling of delivery catheters and leads, interpretation of intracardiac electrograms, fluoroscopy and the surface ECG, finding the optimal pacing site, and implantation of the lead to fine-tuning and troubleshooting of difficult implantations and lead dislodgement. This review should help to facilitate the implantation of His bundle leads, shorten the learning curve and help to improve implantation results.

Relevance of electrical remodeling in human atrial fibrillation: results of the Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke Evaluation in Pacemaker Patients and the Atrial Fibrillation Reduction Atrial Pacing Trial mechanisms of atrial fibrillation study.

BACKGROUND: In animal models of atrial fibrillation (AF), changes in atrial electrophysiological properties are associated with the development of AF. Their relevance to human AF is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke Evaluation in Pacemaker Patients and the Atrial Fibrillation Reduction Atrial Pacing Trial enrolled 2580 patients receiving a dual-chamber pacemaker, who were older than the age of 65 and had a history of hypertension, but no history of AF. Serial noninvasive electrophysiological testing was performed over 2 years in a subgroup of 485 patients. There were no differences in the clinical characteristics between patients with and those without device-detected atrial tachyarrhythmias during the first year. Patients with atrial tachyarrhythmias had longer paced (153±29 versus 145±28 ms; P=0.046) and sensed (128±46 versus 118±25 ms; P=0.06) P-wave durations and were more likely to have AF induced during electrophysiological testing (23.5% versus 13.6%; P=0.03). They had similar corrected sinus node recovery times at 90 bpm (388±554 versus 376 ± 466 ms; P=0.86), atrial effective refractory periods at 90 bpm (250±32 versus 248±36 ms; P=0.70), and rate-adaptive shortening of the atrial effective refractory periods (14±13 versus 12±14 ms; P=0.11). There were no significant differences in the change in electrophysiological properties over 2 years between patients with and those without atrial tachyarrhythmias. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged P-wave duration, but not differences in atrial effective refractory periods, was associated with the development of atrial tachyarrhythmias in pacemaker patients.

Prevention of immediate reinitiation of atrial tachyarrhythmias by high-rate overdrive pacing: results from a prospective randomized trial.

INTRODUCTION: Immediate reinitiation of atrial tachyarrhythmia (IRAT) is an important cause of failure to maintain sinus rhythm. IRAT prevention by overdrive pacing has not been evaluated in a prospective randomized trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with a DDDRP pacemaker offering temporary atrial overdrive pacing after AT termination (Post Mode Switching Overdrive Pacing [PMOP]) were enrolled into the prospective PIRAT (Prevention of IRAT) trial if paroxysmal AT episodes occurred after implantation. PMOP was randomly activated (120 beats/min for 2 min) or inactive. After 3 months, device memory was interrogated, symptoms and quality of life assessed, and patients crossed over to the alternative treatment arm for another 3 months. Primary study endpoint was the number of AT episodes; secondary endpoints were the cumulative time in AT (AT burden), percentage of AT episodes with IRAT, symptoms, and quality of life with PMOP active versus inactive. In 37 patients (21 men; 69 +/- 9 years), there was no difference in the median number of AT episodes (0.37 vs 0.34 per day), AT burden (both 1%), percentage of episodes with IRAT (30%vs 28%), symptoms, and quality of life during PMOP off versus on. With PMOP active, 29% of 439 ATs restarted during and 18% before PMOP intervention. The PMOP-induced rate increase appeared to be associated with IRAT in 9% of AT episodes. CONCLUSION: Automatic overdrive pacing after AT termination did not prevent IRAT, mainly due to insufficient overdrive suppression even at 120 beats/min and the delay between AT termination and PMOP intervention.

Usefulness of atrial pacing for prevention and termination of atrial tachyarrhythmias in a patient with persistent atrial fibrillation.

Atrial pacing with dedicated algorithms for prevention and termination of atrial tachyarrhythmias is under clinical evaluation. A patient is described with persistent symptomatic AF. After cardioversion and implantation of a DDDRP pacemaker before planned AVN ablation, the patient was free of symptoms. Early after implant, one cardioversion of AF was necessary. Over the course of 12 months, only five episodes of atrial tachyarrhythmia occurred, all automatically pace terminated within 24 hours. Thus, selected patients with persistent AF may benefit from preventive atrial pacing since the tachyarrhythmia can organize intermittently to a degree sufficient for pace termination.