Influence of penicillin prophylaxis on antimicrobial resistance in nasopharyngeal S. pneumoniae among children with sickle cell anemia. The Ancillary Nasopharyngeal Culture Study of Prophylactic Penicillin Study II.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the consequences of prolonged prophylactic penicillin use on the rates of nasopharyngeal colonization with Streptococcus pneumoniae and the prevalence of resistant pneumococcal strains in children with sickle cell anemia. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal specimens were obtained from children with sickle cell anemia (Hb SS or Hb S beta degrees thalassemia) at 10 teaching hospitals throughout the United States. These patients were participating in a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in which they were prescribed prophylactic penicillin before their fifth birthday and were randomized to prophylactic penicillin or placebo after their fifth birthday (PROPS II). The specimens were cultured for S. pneumoniae, and isolates were analyzed for antimicrobial susceptibility to nine commonly prescribed antimicrobial agents. RESULTS: Of the 226 patients observed, an average of 8.4 specimens were collected per patient. From 1,896 individual culture specimens, 5.5% of the specimens were positive for S. pneumoniae; 27% of patients had at least one positive culture. Nine percent of the study patients had at least one isolate of penicillin intermediate or resistant pneumococci. There was no significant difference in the percent of positive cultures for S. pneumoniae in those patients given penicillin prophylaxis after 5 years of age (4.1%) compared with those patients given placebo after 5 years of age (6.4%). Likewise, there was no significant difference (p = 0.298) in the percent of patients with at least one positive culture for S. pneumoniae in the group given prophylactic penicillin after 5 years of age (21.8%) compared with the group given placebo after 5 years of age (28.3%). There was no difference between the penicillin and placebo groups in the proportion of patients with penicillin intermediate or resistant pneumococci, but there was a trend toward increased carriage of multiply drug-resistant pneumococci in children > 5 years of age receiving prophylactic penicillin compared to children > 5 years of age receiving placebo. The increased colonization rate with multiply drug-resistant organisms of children > 5 years of age receiving penicillin prophylaxis is not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The potential for continued penicillin prophylaxis to contribute to the development of multiply resistant pneumococci should be considered before continuing penicillin prophylaxis in children with sickle cell anemia who are older than 5 years of age. Added to the published data from PROPS II, which demonstrated no apparent advantage to continue prophylaxis, the data support the conclusion that, for children with no history of invasive pneumococcal disease, consideration should be given to discontinue prophylactic penicillin after their fifth birthday.

Discontinuing penicillin prophylaxis in children with sickle cell anemia. Prophylactic Penicillin Study II.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the consequences of discontinuing penicillin prophylaxis at 5 years of age in children with sickle cell anemia who had received prophylactic penicillin for much of their lives. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Eighteen teaching hospitals throughout the United States. PATIENTS: Children with sickle cell anemia (hemoglobin SS or hemoglobin S beta 0-thalassemia) who had received prophylactic penicillin therapy for at least 2 years immediately before their fifth birthday and had received the 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine between 2 and 3 years of age and again at the time of randomization. Of 599 potential candidates, 400 were randomly selected and followed for an average of 3.2 years. INTERVENTIONS: After randomization, patients received the study medication twice daily--either penicillin V potassium, 250 mg, or an identical placebo tablet. Patients were either seen in the clinic or contacted every 3 months thereafter for an interval history and dispensing of the study drug. A physical examination was scheduled every 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was a comparison of the incidence of bacteremia or meningitis caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae in children continuing penicillin prophylaxis versus those receiving the placebo. RESULTS: Six children had a systemic infection caused by S. pneumoniae, four in the placebo group (2.0%; 95% confidence interval 0.5%, 5.0%) and two in the continued penicillin prophylaxis group (1.0%; 95% confidence interval 0.1%, 3.6%) with a relative risk of 0.5 (95% confidence interval 0.1, 2.7). All invasive isolates were either serotype 6(A or B) or serotype 23F. Four of the isolates were penicillin susceptible, and two (one from each treatment group) were penicillin and multiply antibiotic resistant. Adverse effects of the study drug were reported for three patients (nausea, vomiting, or both), one of whom was in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: Children with sickle cell anemia who have not had a prior severe pneumococcal infection or a splenectomy and are receiving comprehensive care may safely stop prophylactic penicillin therapy at 5 years of age. Parents must be aggressively counseled to seek medical attention for all febrile events in children with sickle cell anemia.