Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation to treat idiopathic central sleep apnea.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Idiopathic central sleep apnea (ICSA) is a rare disorder diagnosed when known causes of central sleep apnea are excluded. No established treatments exist for ICSA, and long-term studies are lacking. We assessed the long-term effectiveness and safety of transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation in patients with ICSA. METHODS: In the remede System Pivotal Trial, 16/151 (11%) participants with central sleep apnea were diagnosed as having ICSA. Patients were implanted and followed through 18 months of active therapy. Polysomnograms obtained at baseline and at 6, 12, and 18 months were scored by a central laboratory. Sleep metrics and patient-reported quality of life outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Patients experienced moderate-severe central sleep apnea. The baseline AHI, central apnea index, and arousal index were 40, 25, and 32 events/h of sleep, respectively. These metrics improved at 6, 12, and 18 months of therapy: the AHI decreased by 25, 25, and 23 events/h (P < .001 at each visit), the central apnea index by 22, 23, and 22 events/h (P < .001 at each visit), and the arousal index by 12 (P = .005), 11 (P = .035), and 13 events/h (P < .001). Quality of life instruments showed clinically meaningful improvements in daytime somnolence, fatigue, general and mental health, and social functioning. The only related serious adverse event was lead component failure in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: This is the longest prospective study for the treatment of ICSA. Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation significantly decreased sleep-disordered breathing metrics with consequent improvement in quality of life at 6 months, and all benefits were sustained through 18 months. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Respicardia, Inc. Pivotal Trial of the remede System; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01816776; Identifier: NCT01816776.

Apneas of Heart Failure and Phenotype-Guided Treatments: Part One: OSA.

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), including OSA and central sleep apnea, is highly prevalent in patients with heart failure (HF). Multiple studies have reported this high prevalence in asymptomatic as well as symptomatic patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF), as well as in those with HF with preserved ejection fraction. The acute pathobiologic consequences of OSA, including exaggerated sympathetic activity, oxidative stress, and inflammation, eventually could lead to progressive left ventricular dysfunction, repeated hospitalization, and excessive mortality. Large numbers of observational studies and a few small randomized controlled trials have shown improvement in various cardiovascular consequences of SDB with treatment. There are no long-term randomized controlled trials to show improved survival of patients with HF and treatment of OSA. One trial of positive airway pressure treatment of OSA included patients with HF and showed no improvement in clinical outcomes. However, any conclusions derived from this trial must take into account several important pitfalls that have been extensively discussed in the literature. With the role of positive airway pressure as the sole therapy for SDB in HF increasingly questioned, a critical examination of long-accepted concepts in this field is needed. The objective of this review was to incorporate recent advances in the field into a phenotype-based approach to the management of OSA in HF.

Long-term efficacy and safety of phrenic nerve stimulation for the treatment of central sleep apnea.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) in patients with moderate-to-severe central sleep apnea (CSA) through 3 years of therapy. METHODS: Patients in the remede System Pivotal Trial were observed every 3 months after implant until US Food and Drug Administration approval. At the time of approval and study closure, all patients completed 24 months of follow-up; 33 patients had not reached the 36-month visit. Sleep metrics (polysomnography) and echocardiographic parameters are reported at baseline, 12, 18, and 24 months, in addition to available 36-month sleep results from polygraphy. Safety was assessed through 36 months; however, analysis focused through 24 months and available 36-month results are provided. RESULTS: Patients were assessed at 24 (n = 109) and 36 (n = 60) months. Baseline characteristics included mean age 64 years, 91% male, and mean apnea-hypopnea index 47 events per hour. Sleep metrics (apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), central apnea index, arousal index, oxygen desaturation index, rapid eye movement sleep) remained improved through 24 and 36 months with continuous use of PNS therapy. At least 60% of patients in the treatment group achieved at least 50% reduction in AHI through 24 months. Serious adverse events (SAEs) related to the remede System implant procedure, device, or therapy through 24 months were reported by 10% of patients, no unanticipated adverse device effects or deaths, and all events resolved. No additional related SAEs were reported between 24 and 36 months. CONCLUSION: These data suggest beneficial effects of long-term PNS in patients with CSA appear to sustain through 36 months with no new safety concerns. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01816776.

Phrenic nerve stimulation to treat patients with central sleep apnoea and heart failure.

AIMS: The presence of central sleep apnoea (CSA) is associated with poor prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF). The aim of this analysis was to evaluate if using phrenic nerve stimulation to treat CSA in patients with CSA and HF was associated with changes in HF-specific metrics. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients randomized in the remede System Pivotal Trial and identified at baseline with HF were included (n = 96). Effectiveness data from treatment and former control groups were pooled based on months since therapy activation. Changes from baseline to 6 and 12 months in sleep metrics, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, patient global assessment health-related quality of life, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ), and echocardiographic parameters are reported. HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and the composite of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death within 6 months are reported by the original randomized group assignment for safety assessment. Sleep metrics and quality of life improved from baseline to 6 and 12 months. At 12 months, MLHFQ scores changed by -6.8 ± 20.0 (P = 0.005). The 6-month rate of HF hospitalization was 4.7% in treatment patients (standard error = 3.3) and 17.0% in control patients (standard error = 5.5) (P = 0.065). Reported adverse events were as expected for a transvenous implantable system. CONCLUSIONS: Phrenic nerve stimulation reduces CSA severity in patients with HF. In parallel, this CSA treatment was associated with benefits on HF quality of life.

Sustained 12 Month Benefit of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation for Central Sleep Apnea.

Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation improved sleep metrics and quality of life after 6 months versus control in the remede System Pivotal Trial. This analysis explored the effectiveness of phrenic nerve stimulation in patients with central sleep apnea after 12 months of therapy. Reproducibility of treatment effect was assessed in the former control group in whom the implanted device was initially inactive for the sixth month and subsequently activated when the randomized control assessments were complete. Patients with moderate-to-severe central sleep apnea implanted with the remede System were randomized to therapy activation at 1 month (treatment) or after 6 months (control). Sleep indices were assessed from baseline to 12 months in the treatment group and from 6 to 12 months in former controls. In the treatment group, a ≥50% reduction in apnea-hypopnea index occurred in 60% of patients at 6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 47% to 64%) and 67% (95% CI 53% to 78%) at 12 months. After 6 months of therapy, 55% of former controls (95% CI 43% to 67%) achieved ≥50%reduction in apnea-hypopnea index. Patient Global Assessment was markedly ormoderately improved at 6 and 12 months in 60% of treatment patients.Improvements persisted at 12 months. A serious adverse event within 12 months occurred in 13 patients (9%). Phrenic nerve stimulation produced sustained improvements in sleep indices and quality of life to at least 12 months in patients with central sleep apnea. The similar improvement of former controls after 6 months of active therapy confirms benefits are reproducible and reliable.

Design of the remede System Pivotal Trial: A Prospective, Randomized Study in the Use of Respiratory Rhythm Management to Treat Central Sleep Apnea.

BACKGROUND: Central sleep apnea is common in patients with cardiovascular disease and worsens outcomes. There is a lack of established therapies for central sleep apnea, and those available are limited by poor patient adherence and potentially adverse cardiovascular effects, at least in a subset of patients. The remede System (Respicardia, Minnetonka, Minnesota) is a new physiologic treatment that uses transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation to contract the diaphragm, thereby stabilizing gas exchange and restoring normal breathing throughout the sleep period. METHODS: This is a prospective multicenter randomized trial with blinded end points evaluating the safety and efficacy of the remede System. Up to 173 patients with central sleep apnea will be randomized 1:1 to remede System therapy initiated at 1 month after implantation (treatment) or to an implanted remede System that will remain inactive for 6 months (control). Primary efficacy end point is the percentage of patients who experience a reduction in apnea-hypopnea index by a ≥ 50% at 6 months (responder analysis). Primary safety end point is freedom from serious adverse events through 12 months. Secondary end points include sleep-disordered breathing parameters, sleep architecture, Epworth Sleepiness Scale score, and Patient Global Assessment. CONCLUSIONS: This is the 1st randomized controlled trial of the safety and efficacy of the remede System for the treatment of central sleep apnea.

Phrenic nerve stimulation for the treatment of central sleep apnea.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate chronic, transvenous, unilateral phrenic nerve stimulation to treat central sleep apnea (CSA) in a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized study. BACKGROUND: CSA occurs predominantly in patients with heart failure and increases the risk for morbidity and mortality. Established therapies for CSA are lacking, and those available are limited by poor patient adherence. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with CSA underwent baseline polysomnography followed by transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation system implantation and follow-up. Feasibility was assessed by implantation success rate and therapy delivery. Safety was evaluated by monitoring of device- and procedure-related adverse events. Efficacy was evaluated by changes in the apnea-hypopnea index at 3 months. Quality of life at 6 months was evaluated using a sleepiness questionnaire, patient global assessment, and, in patients with heart failure at baseline, the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire. RESULTS: The study met its primary end point, demonstrating a 55% reduction in apnea-hypopnea index from baseline to 3 months (49.5 ± 14.6 episodes/h vs. 22.4 ± 13.6 episodes/h of sleep; p < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval for change: -32.3 to -21.9). Central apnea index, oxygenation, and arousals significantly improved. Favorable effects on quality of life and sleepiness were noted. In patients with heart failure, the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire score significantly improved. Device- or procedure-related serious adverse events occurred in 26% of patients through 6 months post therapy initiation, predominantly due to lead repositioning early in the study. Therapy was well tolerated. Efficacy was maintained at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Transvenous, unilateral phrenic nerve stimulation appears safe and effective for treating CSA. These findings should be confirmed in a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. (Chronic Evaluation of Respicardia Therapy; NCT01124370).

Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation for the treatment of central sleep apnoea in heart failure.

AIMS: Periodic breathing with central sleep apnoea (CSA) is common in heart failure patients and is associated with poor quality of life and increased risk of morbidity and mortality. We conducted a prospective, non-randomized, acute study to determine the feasibility of using unilateral transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation for the treatment of CSA in heart failure patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-one patients from six centres underwent attempted transvenous lead placement. Of these, 16 qualified to undergo two successive nights of polysomnography-one night with and one night without phrenic nerve stimulation. Comparisons were made between the two nights using the following indices: apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI), central apnoea index (CAI), obstructive apnoea index (OAI), hypopnoea index, arousal index, and 4% oxygen desaturation index (ODI4%). Patients underwent phrenic nerve stimulation from either the right brachiocephalic vein (n = 8) or the left brachiocephalic or pericardiophrenic vein (n = 8). Therapy period was (mean ± SD) 251 ± 71 min. Stimulation resulted in significant improvement in the AHI [median (inter-quartile range); 45 (39-59) vs. 23 (12-27) events/h, P = 0.002], CAI [27 (11-38) vs. 1 (0-5) events/h, P≤ 0.001], arousal index [32 (20-42) vs. 12 (9-27) events/h, P = 0.001], and ODI4% [31 (22-36) vs. 14 (7-20) events/h, P = 0.002]. No significant changes occurred in the OAI or hypopnoea index. Two adverse events occurred (lead thrombus and episode of ventricular tachycardia), though neither was directly related to phrenic nerve stimulation therapy. CONCLUSION: Unilateral transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation significantly reduces episodes of CSA and restores a more natural breathing pattern in patients with heart failure. This approach may represent a novel therapy for CSA and warrants further study.