Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Transplant Proc ; 48(4): 1071-3, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27320559

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Dual graft living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an alternative way to overcome small-for-size syndrome in LDLT. Surgical technique and outcome of using dual grafts have been reported, but there are no reports regarding anesthetic management. The aim of the current study is to compare the anesthetic management of single graft and dual graft liver transplantation. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Anesthesia records of 24 single graft liver transplantation recipients (GI) and 6 dual graft recipients (GII) were reviewed, analyzed, and compared retrospectively. Patient characteristics and intraoperative data between groups were compared with Mann-Whitney t test and Fisher's exact test where appropriate. P value less than .05 was regarded as significant. RESULTS: Patient characteristics and most of the intraoperative data were similar between groups. Significant difference was noted in the total anesthesia time and the anhepatic time. Both times were significantly longer in GII compared to GI. CONCLUSION: Dual graft living donor liver transplantation is surely a technically more challenging and demanding procedure. Therefore the total anesthesia time is longer, especially the anhepatic phase, because there are more graft vessels to be reconstructed before reperfusion. Overall the anesthetic management in terms of blood transfusion, fluid administration, sodium bicarbonate, calcium supplement, and the number of patients requiring fractional diluted noradrenaline support for maintenance of acceptable hemodynamic were not much different between the 2 groups.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia/métodos , Trasplante de Hígado/métodos , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anestesia/efectos adversos , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Fluidoterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Donadores Vivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estadísticas no Paramétricas
2.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 37(2): 192-4, 1993 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8447210

RESUMEN

Postoperative vomiting causes patients distress and delays discharge after outpatient surgery. Although P6 electroacupuncture is recognized as having an antiemetic effect, its inconvenient instrumentation may limit its clinical applicability. The purpose of this study was to explore a simple and effective alternative method for control of postoperative vomiting in outpatient surgery. We prospectively compared the effect of P6 acupoint injection with 0.2 ml 50% glucose in water (G/W) and intravenous injection of 20 micrograms/kg droperidol for prevention of vomiting in 120 consecutive outpatients undergoing gynecological laparoscopy with general anesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated to receive P6 acupoint injection, i.v. droperidol, or nothing as control group. Both P6 acupoint injection and i.v. droperidol 20 micrograms/kg were found to have a significant antiemetic effect when compared with the control group. We conclude that P6 acupoint injection with 50% G/W is a simple and effective method for reducing the incidence of postoperative emesis in outpatient surgery.


Asunto(s)
Puntos de Acupuntura , Droperidol/uso terapéutico , Glucosa/uso terapéutico , Laparoscopía , Vómitos/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Anestesia por Inhalación , Anestesia Intravenosa , Droperidol/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Glucosa/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Incidencia , Inyecciones , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos
3.
Anaesthesia ; 45(4): 327-9, 1990 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2140030

RESUMEN

One hundred unpremedicated female patients of ASA grade 1 or 2 who underwent laparoscopy as outpatients were allocated randomly to one of four groups. All patients received general anaesthesia with fentanyl, thiopentone, halothane, nitrous oxide and oxygen; suxamethonium was given to facilitate tracheal intubation. In the recovery room, group 1 (control) received no treatment; group 2 received electro-acupuncture at the P6 point (Neiguan) on the right side for 15 minutes, group 3 received transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation at the P6 point on the right side for 15 minutes and group 4 received prochlorperazine 5 mg intravenously. Any act of vomiting, including dry retching, during the first 3 postoperative hours was regarded as postoperative emesis. The incidence of postoperative emesis was 11/25 (44%) in group 1, 3/25 (12%, p less than 0.05) in group 2, 9/25 (36%) in group 3, and 3/25 (12%, p less than 0.05) in group 4. Our results suggest that electro-acupuncture is as effective as prochlorperazine, and may be better than transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, in reducing postoperative emesis.


Asunto(s)
Electroacupuntura , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Vómitos/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Anestesia General , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proclorperazina/uso terapéutico , Distribución Aleatoria , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA