Change in intraoperative rectal temperature influencing erectile dysfunction following transurethral resection of the prostate.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: In this study, we assessed the relationship between changes in intraoperative rectal temperature and erectile function in patients who have undergone transurethral resection of the prostate. METHODS: Eighty-six potential patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia-induced lower urinary tract symptoms were studied. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1-small prostates (<40 ml) and group 2-large prostates (≥ 40 ml), as determined by transrectal ultrasound measurement. The intraoperative rectal temperature was evaluated using a transrectal thermosensor and the differences between the highest intra- and preoperative temperatures were recorded. The erectile function at baseline, at three months and at one-year postoperatively was assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) questionnaire. RESULTS: Intraoperative rectal temperature differences were 0.54 ± 0.24°C for group 1 (n=45) and 0.44 ± 0.20°C for group 2 (n=41), (p=0.04). The IIEF-5 scores for group1 and group 2 were, respectively, 20.9 ± 1.6 and 20.6 ± 1.6 at baseline (p=0.32), 17.3 ± 2.9 and 18.7 ± 3.2 (p=0.037) at 3 months, 17.9 ± 2.7 and 18.7 ± 3.0 (p=0.17) at 1 year postoperatively. The deterioration of erectile function at 3 months post-operatively was observed for both groups. The percentage of retrograde ejaculation between two groups was not significantly different (p=0.33) at 1 year postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed that a higher intraoperative rectal temperature difference caused by transurethral resection of the prostate might affect the postoperative erectile function, particularly in patients with a small prostate.

Transurethral RollerLoop vapor resection of prostate for treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: a 2-year follow-up study.

OBJECTIVE: We compared the 2-year safety and efficacy of two transurethral resection techniques-transurethral vapor resection of the prostate (TUVRP) and conventional loop transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)-in the surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between August 1997 and September 2002, 441 patients underwent transurethral prostatectomy, either TUVRP (n = 221) or TURP (n = 220). TUVRP was performed using a "RollerLoop" resection loop. All patients were assessed preoperatively by means of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QOL) score, prostate volume, peak urinary flow (Qmax) and post-void residual volume (PVR) measurements and a sexual function questionnaire. Patients were followed up for 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery, and this was followed by a comparison of the incidences of sexual dysfunction, complications and re-treatment. RESULTS: After 2 years of follow-up, no differences were noted between the TUVRP and TURP groups with respect to average IPSS (p = 0.9), QOL scores (p = 0.56), Qmax (p = 0.89) or PVR (p = 0.55), as well as the incidences of bladder neck contracture or urethral stricture (p = 0.34), re-treatment (p = 0.49) or sexual dysfunction (p = 0.57). However, significant reductions in operative time (p = 0.005), decrease in serum hemoglobin levels (p < 0.001), catheterization time (p < 0.001), postoperative hospital stay (p < 0.001) and hospitalization costs (p < 0.001) were observed in the TUVRP group compared to the TURP group. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that TUVRP provides equivalent safety and efficacy to TURP during a 2-year follow-up period, in which short-term advantages in perioperative morbidity and cost savings were also demonstrated.