Awareness and Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Korean Lung Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has been used frequently, and its use continues to increase in lung cancer patients, despite insufficient scientific of its efficacy. To investigate this situation, we analyzed the current awareness and use of CAM in Korean lung-cancer patients. METHODS: This prospective survey-based study was performed at seven medical centers in South Korea between August and October 2019. The survey assessed general patient characteristics and the awareness and use of CAM. We analyzed differences in the clinical parameters of patients aware and not aware of CAM and of CAM non-users and users. RESULTS: Of the 434 patients included in this study, 68.8% responded that they were aware of CAM and 30.9% said they had experienced it. In univariate analysis, the patients aware of CAM were younger with poor performance status, had advanced-stage lung cancer, received more systemic therapy, and received concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT). By multiple logistic regression, younger age, poor performance status, advanced stage, and prior CCRT were identified as independent risk factors for CAM awareness. There were no significant differences in the general characteristics and cancer-associated clinical parameters of CAM non-users and users. CONCLUSION: Specific clinical parameters were associated with patients' awareness of CAM, although there were no significantly different characteristics between CAM users and non-users.

Chest radiography surveillance for lung cancer: Results from a National Health Insurance database in South Korea.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography reduced mortality in selected high risk patients. However, the use of chest radiography for lung cancer screening in Asian populations is still controversial. We investigated the effectiveness of chest radiographic surveillance using a nationwide health service data in South Korea. METHODS: Data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service examinee cohort of 2004 to 2013 were examined, and 63,228 patients with lung cancer were identified, 38,494 (57%) of whom underwent chest radiography screening. The others did not undergo lung cancer screening and were considered as a control group. Clinical data including age, smoking, screening intervals, lung cancer stages, treatments, and survival were collected. Survival gain from surveillance after adjustment for lead-time bias based on the sojourn time was calculated. Cox-proportional hazard analyses were performed to evaluate the effectiveness of screening and to determine the appropriate screening interval for chest radiography surveillance. RESULTS: Early lung cancer was found in 38% of patients receiving chest radiography versus 26% of those without surveillance. A patient age of more than 65 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.53; 95% confidence limits [CL], 1.50-1.56), male (HR, 1.66; 95% CL, 1.62-1.70), and high lung cancer stages at the time of diagnosis were independent factors associated with mortality (each, P < 0.001). Chest radiography surveillance was a factor for decreasing mortality in female (HR, 0.81; 95% CL, 0.77-0.84, P < 0.001), with mortality reduction of 10% at the 3- and 5-year survival time-points. In female patients, chest radiography surveillance at intervals of less than 3 years was an independent predictor of improved survival. CONCLUSIONS: Surveillance chest radiography increased survival in a female screened population in South Korea. Chest radiography intervals of less than 3 years may help to detect lung cancer in female patients.

The efficacy of rifabutin for rifabutin-susceptible, multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the efficacy of rifabutin (RFB)-containing regimens for the treatment of RFB-susceptible, multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). METHODS: From 146 patients diagnosed with MDR-TB between January 2006 and December 2009 at Asan Medical Center in South Korea, 31 patients (21.2%) were found to have RFB-susceptible MDR-TB. Of these 31 patients, 14 patients who had been treated with RFB for more than one month were included. Forty-two patients with RFB-resistant MDR-TB were selected as a control group, and the outcomes of both groups were retrospectively compared. RESULTS: Of 14 patients with RFB-susceptible MDR-TB, the mean age was 44.4 years and the proportion of extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB) was 35.7% (5/14). Baseline characteristics and the drug resistance pattern (except RFB) did not differ between the two groups. Treatment success was achieved in 12 (85.7%) patients in the RFB group: cure in 10 (71.4%) and treatment completion in two (14.3%). The treatment success rate was 52.4% (22/42) in the control group (p = 0.032). Treatment failure was more common in patients of the control group (40.5% vs. 14.3%; p = 0.106). CONCLUSIONS: RFB is useful as an additional drug in the treatment of MDR-TB in patients with RFB-susceptible MDR-TB.