Efficacy of Berberine in Patients with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

OBJECTIVES: A randomized, parallel controlled, open-label clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of a botanic compound berberine (BBR) on NAFLD. METHODS: A randomized, parallel controlled, open-label clinical trial was conducted in three medical centers (NIH Registration number: NCT00633282). A total of 184 eligible patients with NAFLD were enrolled and randomly received (i) lifestyle intervention (LSI), (ii) LSI plus pioglitazone (PGZ) 15mg qd, and (iii) LSI plus BBR 0.5g tid, respectively, for 16 weeks. Hepatic fat content (HFC), serum glucose and lipid profiles, liver enzymes and serum and urine BBR concentrations were assessed before and after treatment. We also analyzed hepatic BBR content and expression of genes related to glucose and lipid metabolism in an animal model of NAFLD treated with BBR. RESULTS: As compared with LSI, BBR treatment plus LSI resulted in a significant reduction of HFC (52.7% vs 36.4%, p = 0.008), paralleled with better improvement in body weight, HOMA-IR, and serum lipid profiles (all p<0.05). BBR was more effective than PGZ 15mg qd in reducing body weight and improving lipid profile. BBR-related adverse events were mild and mainly occurred in digestive system. Serum and urine BBR concentrations were 6.99ng/ml and 79.2ng/ml, respectively, in the BBR-treated subjects. Animal experiments showed that BBR located favorably in the liver and altered hepatic metabolism-related gene expression. CONCLUSION: BBR ameliorates NAFLD and related metabolic disorders. The therapeutic effect of BBR on NAFLD may involve a direct regulation of hepatic lipid metabolism. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00633282.

Glipizide controlled-release tablets, with or without acarbose, improve glycaemic variability in newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes.

1. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of glipizide controlled-release (CR) tablets monotherapy with that of glipizide CR tablets plus acarbose on glycaemic variability in newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients using a continuous glucose-monitoring system (CGMS). 2. Forty newly diagnosed T2DM patients whose glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels ranged from 7.0% to 9.8% were randomized to either monotherapy or combination therapy. Overall glycaemic control and blood glucose variability were evaluated by CGMS parameters. 3. After 8 weeks treatment, fasting and postprandial blood glucose, HbA1c, glycated albumin (GA), mean blood glucose (MBG), mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions (MAGE), postprandial incremental area under the curve (AUC(pp)) and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance decreased significantly in both groups (P < 0.01). There was also a significant decrease in the mean of daily differences (MODD) in the combination therapy group. Mean changes in MBG, MAGE, MODD and AUC(pp) were significantly greater in the combination therapy group than in the monotherapy group (all P < 0.01), whereas no significant differences were found in the mean changes of HbA1c and GA. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the decrement in AUC(pp) was significantly associated with decreases in MAGE. 4. In conclusion, glipizide CR tablets alone or in combination with acarbose can improve overall blood glucose levels and glycaemic variability. Combination therapy using glipizide CR tablets and acarbose was more effective in reducing intraday and day-to-day glycaemic variability than glipizide CR tablet monotherapy.