Trust in healthcare providers among Chinese immigrants living with hepatitis B virus in Australia: A qualitative study.

Despite the importance of trust in healthcare settings, there remains a paucity of evidence on the role it plays in patient-provider relationships and healthcare outcomes among people living with hepatitis B virus (HBV). International evidence suggests that Chinese immigrants living with HBV experience inequitable access, outcomes and treatment quality in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) health care. This study explores individual trust in healthcare providers and its impact on health-seeking behaviours and health outcomes among Chinese people living with HBV in Australia. A total of 16 participants were recruited from the Chinese community in Sydney and Melbourne and participated in semi-structured interviews. The data were analysed within a conceptual model of trust that contains five dimensions: fidelity, competence, honesty, confidentiality and global trust. The data shows how trust in physicians was formed and influenced by factors including patient-provider interactions, historically relevant experiences, health and illness beliefs and systemic barriers. While the research confirms prior findings on the impact of trust and mistrust, showing an association between low trust and treatment nonadherence, it also generates fresh insights by examining what leads to mistrust and the role of trust in shaping participants' healthcare outcomes. Findings suggest that by treating patients with respect and dignity, improving interpersonal skills and cultural competency, having open discussion on complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) treatment and protecting private information, physicians can increase patients' trust. The findings will contribute to efforts to address HBV as a health priority and increase patients' trust in healthcare providers among Chinese immigrants living with HBV.

Perioperative safety and short-term efficacy of functional minimally invasive esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Standard minimally invasive McKeown three-field esophagectomy (SMIE) results in high perioperative risk and poor postoperative quality of life owing to considerable surgical damage and numerous postoperative complications. We created a modified procedure, functional minimally invasive esophagectomy (FMIE), which preserves the azygos arch, bronchial artery, pulmonary branch of the vagus nerve, and the mediastinal pleura. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FMIE and to determine whether it has limited invasiveness. METHODS: Between 2018 and 2020, FMIE was performed for 48 patients who were compared with 76 SMIE cases; 44 paired cases were matched using propensity score matching. RESULTS: Operation time, extubation time, and postoperative hospital stay were significantly lower in the FMIE group. FMIE was also associated with fewer pulmonary infections. Postoperative drainage volume on postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD 2, and white blood cell counts on POD 2 and POD 4 were also significantly lower in the FMIE group. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of dissected lymph nodes, short-term recurrence, metastasis rates, or survival rate between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: FMIE is a less invasive procedure and may be a suitable alternative for lower and early middle esophageal carcinoma.