RESUMEN
Female genital mutilation (FGM), also referred to as female genital cutting (FGC), has become the subject of an intense debate exposing tensions between varying cultural values about bodies and sexuality. These issues are brought to the fore in settings where professionals provide sexual counselling to young circumcised women and girls in Western, multicultural societies. This article is based on interviews and focus group discussions with professionals in social and healthcare services. The aim of this study was to examine how professionals reflect upon and talk about sexuality and the promotion of sexual wellbeing in young circumcised women and girls. Policy documents guide their obligations, yet they are also influenced by culture-specific notions about bodies and sexuality and what can be called "the FGM standard tale". The study found that professionals showed great commitment to helping the girls and young women in the best possible way. Their basic starting point, however, was characterised by a reductionist focus on the genitalia's role in sexuality, thus neglecting other important dimensions in lived sexuality. In some cases, such an attitude may negatively affect an individual's body image and sexual self-esteem. Future policy making in the field of sexual health among girls and young women with FGC would benefit from taking a broader holistic approach to sexuality. Professionals need to find ways of working that promote sexual wellbeing in girls, and must avoid messages that evoke body shame or feelings of loss of sexual capacity among those affected by FGC.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Circuncisión Femenina/psicología , Personal de Salud/psicología , Salud Sexual , Imagen Corporal , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Autoimagen , Consejo Sexual , Suecia , Salud de la MujerRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review was to explore current research on the impact of migration on issues related to female genital cutting and sexuality. RECENT FINDINGS: There is growing evidence that migration results in a broad opposition to female genital cutting among concerned migrant groups in western countries. In addition, after migration, affected women live in the midst of a dominant discourse categorizing them as "mutilated" and sexually disfigured. There is also, in contrast to what is shown by most research, a public discourse saying that female genital cutting (FGC) leads to lost capacity to enjoy sex. Concurrently, a vast body of research demonstrates a strong correlation between a negative body image or body shame and sexual dysfunction. SUMMARY: Care for women with FGC needs to be holistic and, while offering medical care when needed, the health care providers should avoid feeding into self-depreciatory body images and notions about lost ability to enjoy sexual life.
RESUMEN
In recent decades, there has been growing attention to the overuse of caesarean section (CS) globally. In light of a high CS rate at a university hospital in Tanzania, we aimed to explore obstetric caregivers' rationales for their hospital's CS rate to identify factors that might cause CS overuse. After participant observations, we performed 22 semi-structured individual in-depth interviews and 2 focus group discussions with 5-6 caregivers in each. Respondents were consultants, specialists, residents, and midwives. The study relied on a framework of naturalistic inquiry and we analyzed data using thematic analysis. As a conceptual framework, we situated our findings in the discussion of how transparency and auditing can induce behavioral change and have unintended effects. Caregivers had divergent opinions on whether the hospital's CS rate was a problem or not, but most thought that there was an overuse of CS. All caregivers rationalized the high CS rate by referring to circumstances outside their control. In private practice, some stated they were affected by the economic compensation for CS, while others argued that unnecessary CSs were due to maternal demand. Residents often missed support from their senior colleagues when making decisions, and felt that midwives pushed them to perform CSs. Many caregivers stated that their fear of blame from colleagues and management in case of poor outcomes made them advocate for, or perform, CSs on doubtful indications. In order to lower CS rates, caregivers must acknowledge their roles as decision-makers, and strive to minimize unnecessary CSs. Although auditing and transparency are important to improve patient safety, they must be used with sensitivity regarding any unintended or counterproductive effects they might have.
Asunto(s)
Cuidadores/psicología , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Miedo/psicología , Adulto , Cesárea/economía , Toma de Decisiones , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Países en Desarrollo , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Auditoría Médica , Partería , Pobreza , Embarazo , Rol Profesional , TanzaníaAsunto(s)
Genitales Femeninos/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cirugía Plástica/legislación & jurisprudencia , África/etnología , Circuncisión Femenina/legislación & jurisprudencia , Características Culturales , Emigración e Inmigración/legislación & jurisprudencia , Femenino , Derechos Humanos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Religión y Medicina , Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Suecia/etnología , Vagina/cirugíaAsunto(s)
Circuncisión Femenina/psicología , Servicios de Salud Materna , África/etnología , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Circuncisión Femenina/efectos adversos , Circuncisión Femenina/rehabilitación , Características Culturales , Emigración e Inmigración , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Salud Holística , Humanos , Servicios de Salud Materna/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Embarazo , Religión y Medicina , Medición de Riesgo , Somalia/etnología , SueciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To explore conceptions of obstetric emergency care among traditional birth attendants in rural Guatemala, elucidating social and cultural factors. STUDY: design Qualitative in-depth interview study. SETTING: Rural Guatemala. SAMPLE: Thirteen traditional birth attendants from 11 villages around San Miguel Ixtahuacán, Guatemala. METHOD: Interviews with semi-structured, thematic, open-ended questions. Interview topics were: traditional birth attendants' experiences and conceptions as to the causes of complications, attitudes towards hospital care and referral of obstetric complications. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Conceptions of obstetric complications, hospital referrals and maternal mortality among traditional birth attendants. RESULTS: Pregnant women rather than traditional birth attendants appear to make the decision on how to handle a complication, based on moralistically and fatalistically influenced thoughts about the nature of complications, in combination with a fear of caesarean section, maltreatment and discrimination at a hospital level. There is a discrepancy between what traditional birth attendants consider appropriate in cases of complications, and the actions they implement to handle them. CONCLUSION: Parameters in the referral system, such as logistics and socio-economic factors, are sometimes subordinated to cultural values by the target group. To have an impact on maternal mortality, bilateral culture-sensitive education should be included in maternal health programs.