Pulmonary Mycobacterium kansasii infection: comparison of the clinical features, treatment and outcome with pulmonary tuberculosis.

BACKGROUND: In the United Kingdom Mycobacterium kansasii is the most common pulmonary non-tuberculous mycobacteria to cause disease in the non-HIV positive population. METHODS: The clinical features, treatment, and outcome of 47 patients (13 women) of mean (SD) age 58 (17) years with culture positive pulmonary M kansasii infection were compared with those of 87 patients (23 women) of mean (SD) age 57 (16) years with culture positive pulmonary M tuberculosis infection by review of their clinical and laboratory records. Each patient with M kansasii infection was matched for age, sex, race and, where possible, year of diagnosis with two patients with M tuberculosis infection. RESULTS: All those with M kansasii infection were of white race. Haemoptysis was more common in patients infected with M kansasii but they were less likely to present as a result of an incidental chest radiograph or symptoms other than those due to mycobacterial infection. Patients with M kansasii were also less likely to have a history of diabetes, but the frequency of previous chest disease and tuberculosis was similar. An alcohol intake of > 14 units/week was less frequent in those with M kansasii, but there were no significant differences in drug history, past and present smoking habit, occupational exposures, social class, or marital status. Patients with M kansasii received a longer total course of antimycobacterial therapy and, in particular, extended treatment with ethambutol and rifampicin was given. There was no significant difference in outcome between pulmonary M kansasii or M tuberculosis infection. CONCLUSIONS: There are group differences between the clinical features of the two infections but, with the possible exception of diabetes and alcohol intake, these features are unlikely to be diagnostically helpful. Treatment of M kansasii infection with ethambutol, isoniazid, and rifampicin in these patients was as effective as standard regimens given to patients infected with M tuberculosis.

Effect of high-dose salbutamol on cardiac rhythm in severe chronic airflow obstruction: a controlled study.

Despite concern over possible adverse cardiac effects of high-dose beta-agonists there have been no controlled studies of the effects of such a therapy in patients with severe chronic airflow obstruction (CAO). We therefore studied 22 CAO patients (FEV < 1 litre) with continuous ambulatory cardiac monitoring. Patients received either nebulised salbutamol (5 mg) or saline each given 4 times daily for 24 h on 2 consecutive days, single blind, in random order. Supraventricular arrhythmias were common on both saline and salbutamol days (8 vs. 9 patients, p = NS), but none were clinically apparent. There were no episodes of ventricular tachycardia. Ventricular ectopic activity was highly variable but did not significantly differ between the two study days overall or between specific periods after nebulised salbutamol or saline. Serum potassium (mean) fell by 0.23 (SD 0.06) mmol/l in 10 patients after salbutamol. Baseline FEV1, PaO2, PCO2 were not predictive of arrhythmias or ectopic activity. While occasional adverse effects cannot be excluded, we conclude that high-dose salbutamol does not lead to any general increase in arrhythmogenic potential in severe CAO.

Parenteral nutrition in the cancer patient.

The nutritional state of patients with malignant disease must be assessed at the beginning of treatment. Nutritional supplements, given either orally or intravenously, enable patients to tolerate larger doses of chemotherapy and radiotherapy and the clinical response may be enhanced by nutritional support. Crystalline L aminoacids and glucose are the main nutrients used intravenously and fat emulsions are required in prolonged parenteral nutrition. Hypophosphataemia related to glucose administration and infection related to access to the circulation are the main complications, both of which are preventable. Total parenteral nutrition alone will not improve the results of cancer treatment significantly but its careful use in association with surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy can be most valuable.