Acetaminophen is both bronchodilatory and bronchoprotective in human precision cut lung slice airways.

Epidemiologic studies have demonstrated an association between acetaminophen (APAP) use and the development of asthma symptoms. However, few studies have examined relationships between APAP-induced signaling pathways associated with the development of asthma symptoms. We tested the hypothesis that acute APAP exposure causes airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR) in human airways. Precision cut lung slice (PCLS) airways from humans and mice were used to determine the effects of APAP on airway bronchoconstriction and bronchodilation and to assess APAP metabolism in lungs. APAP did not promote AHR in normal or asthmatic human airways ex vivo. Rather, high concentrations mildly bronchodilated airways pre-constricted with carbachol (CCh), histamine (His), or immunoglobulin E (IgE) cross-linking. Further, the addition of APAP prior to bronchoconstrictors protected the airways from constriction. Similarly, in vivo treatment of mice with APAP (200 mg/kg IP) resulted in reduced bronchoconstrictor responses in PCLS airways ex vivo. Finally, in both mouse and human PCLS airways, exposure to APAP generated only low amounts of APAP-protein adducts, indicating minimal drug metabolic activity in the tissues. These findings indicate that acute exposure to APAP does not initiate AHR, that high-dose APAP is protective against bronchoconstriction, and that APAP is a mild bronchodilator.

Safety, clinical, and immunologic efficacy of a Chinese herbal medicine (Food Allergy Herbal Formula-2) for food allergy.

BACKGROUND: Food Allergy Herbal Formula-2 (FAHF-2) is a 9-herb formula based on traditional Chinese medicine that blocks peanut-induced anaphylaxis in a murine model. In phase I studies FAHF-2 was found to be safe and well tolerated. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of FAHF-2 as a treatment for food allergy. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study 68 subjects aged 12 to 45 years with allergies to peanut, tree nut, sesame, fish, and/or shellfish, which were confirmed by baseline double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenges (DBPCFCs), received FAHF-2 (n = 46) or placebo (n = 22). After 6 months of therapy, subjects underwent DBPCFCs. For those who demonstrated increases in the eliciting dose, a repeat DBPCFC was performed 3 months after stopping therapy. RESULTS: Treatment was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events. By using intent-to-treat analysis, the placebo group had a higher eliciting dose and cumulative dose (P = .05) at the end-of-treatment DBPCFC. There was no difference in the requirement for epinephrine to treat reactions (P = .55). There were no significant differences in allergen-specific IgE and IgG4 levels, cytokine production by PBMCs, or basophil activation between the active and placebo groups. In vitro immunologic studies performed on subjects' baseline PBMCs incubated with FAHF-2 and food allergen produced significantly less IL-5, greater IL-10 levels, and increased numbers of regulatory T cells than untreated cells. Notably, 44% of subjects had poor drug adherence for at least one third of the study period. CONCLUSION: FAHF-2 is a safe herbal medication for subjects with food allergy and shows favorable in vitro immunomodulatory effects; however, efficacy for improving tolerance to food allergens is not demonstrated at the dose and duration used.

The changing CARE for patients with food allergy.

The field of food allergy is continually changing, with advances in clinical care to better understand the mechanisms of disease and in possible new diagnostics and treatment models. The development of several new guidelines that focus on improving the standardization of the diagnosis and management of food allergy has helped to further guide clinicians in providing optimized care for children and adults with food allergy around the world. Much of this work has been made possible through the collaborative efforts of advocacy organizations, industry, and government with clinicians and researchers in the fields of allergy and immunology. We have been able to advance our understanding of disease mechanisms and to help close gaps in knowledge and resolve misconceptions in the treatment of food allergy. This review will focus on the concepts of a holistic approach to food allergy that is working to improve CARE for subjects with food allergy, including new advances in clinical care, advocacy, research, and education.

An update on immunotherapy for food allergy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recent investigation has resulted in significant advances toward definitive therapeutic options for food allergy. In this review, we will explore novel immunotherapeutic interventions for the active treatment of food allergy. RECENT FINDINGS: Because the injection route for allergen immunotherapy to foods has been associated with an unacceptable risk of severe anaphylactic reactions, use of mucosally targeted therapeutic strategies is of significant interest for food allergy. Allergen-specific immunotherapeutic approaches such as oral, sublingual, epicutaneous, and peptide immunotherapy have demonstrated efficacy in increasing threshold dose and inducing immunologic changes associated with both desensitization and oral tolerance in animal and human trials. More global immunomodulatory strategies, such as Traditional Chinese Medicine and anti-IgE therapy have been shown to effectively target the allergic response, and clinical trials are ongoing to determine the efficacy and safety in human food allergy. SUMMARY: The advent of therapies that target the mucosal immune response to promote oral tolerance have shown great promise in the treatment of food hypersensitivity. However, there is still significant risk of adverse reactions associated with these therapeutic strategies and further study is needed to carefully advance these therapeutic modalities toward general clinical implementation.

Hypoallergenicity and effects on growth and tolerance of a new amino acid-based formula with docosahexaenoic acid and arachidonic acid.

OBJECTIVE: In study 1, to compare the effect on growth in healthy infants of a new amino acid-based formula (AAF) and a control extensively hydrolyzed formula (EHF), with both docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and arachidonic acid (ARA) at levels similar to those in human milk worldwide. In study 2, to evaluate the hypoallergenicity of this new AAF in infants and children with confirmed cow's milk allergy (CMA). STUDY DESIGN: In study 1, a total of 165 healthy, full-term, formula-fed infants randomly received the new AAF or control formula. Anthropometric measurements, tolerance, and adverse events were recorded throughout the study. Plasma amino acid profiles were evaluated in a subset of the infants. In study 2, the hypoallergenicity of the new AAF was evaluated in 32 infants and children using a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge; an open challenge; and a 7-day feeding. RESULTS: In study 1, overall growth, tolerance, and safety outcomes were similar in both groups. In study 2, 29 of the 32 subjects completed both challenges; no allergic reaction was seen in any of the 32 subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The new AAF with DHA and ARA at levels similar to those in human milk worldwide is hypoallergenic. It also is safe and supports growth in healthy, term infants.

Spine bone densitometry in asthmatic children treated with high dose corticosteroids: correcting for racial discrepancies.

PURPOSE: Our hypothesis is that the use of standards based on Caucasian children will under-estimate the incidence of abnormal bone density in African American children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-two African American and 80 Caucasian asthmatic children classified as high-dose inhaled corticosteroid users comprised the study population. Bone mineral density measurements were compared to reference standards, based on Caucasians, to calculate Z-values. Regression analysis was used to compare Z-values derived from the race-specific and Caucasian standards for 32 African American children. The derived regression analysis equation was then applied to the entire African American population to determine the incidence of abnormal bone density. RESULTS: The asthmatic Caucasian mean spine bone density was significantly less than the normal standards (p < .001), but the African American mean spine bone density was not, despite the high-dose steroid use. Using the Caucasian standards, Caucasians were significantly more likely to have abnormal bone density detected (p < 0.015). Regression analysis of the 32 children with available race specific standards resulted in the following equation: Z African American= Z Caucasian-0.86. The number of African Americans with abnormal bone density detected using the regression equation was not significantly different than the Caucasian children (p > 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Asthmatic African Americans treated with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids had denser bones than Caucasians. Caucasian standards can be adjusted using a regression equation.