Critical analysis of a multicentric experience with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: outcomes and complications of 10 years of routine clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the perioperative outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in real-life practice and investigate the factors influencing the safety and effectiveness of the technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Critical analysis of patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) treated with HoLEP over 10 years of routine practice in three hospitals. Analysed variables included: preoperative characteristics (prostate size, active antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy, blood parameters. prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, maximum urinary flow rate [Qmax ], and International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS]), intraoperative variables (operation time, concomitant removal of bladder calculi, and complications), early postoperative outcomes (change in blood parameters, catheterisation time, and hospital stay), and 12-month follow-up outcomes (change in IPSS, PSA level, and Qmax ). RESULTS: The analysis included 963 patients, aged 48-91 years, with a mean (range) prostate size of 91 (35-247) mL. The mean (sd) operation time was 77 (29) min, and the hospital stay and catheterisation time were 4 (2) and 1.3 (2) days, respectively. In all, 56 patients (5.6%) required concomitant removal of bladder calculi and 36 (3.7%) were converted to open prostatectomy or transurethral resection of the prostate due to intraoperative complications. Patients had a significant decrease in haemoglobin and haematocrit, but no differences were seen between patients with and without anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy and those with prostates ≥ and <100 mL. The concomitant removal of bladder calculi and having a prostate ≥100 mL resulted in a longer operation time, but did not influence the safety and effectiveness outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: HoLEP is suitable for real-life patients with BPH, irrespective of the presence of active treatment with anticoagulant/antiplatelet, bladder lithiasis or a prostate ≥100 mL.

Factors Influencing Intraoperative Blood Loss in Patients Undergoing Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Large Multicenter Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess blood loss during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and investigate the factors influencing it. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Analysis of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treated with HoLEP at 3 centers. Hemoglobin and hematocrit were measured before surgery and hospital discharge. All blood transfusions performed during and after HoLEP were recorded. Blood loss outcomes were analyzed regarding antithrombotic (antiplatelet/anticoagulant) therapies and drug treatments for BPH and other conditions. RESULTS: The analysis included 963 patients with a mean age of 72 years. Mean (range) prostate size was 102 (40-316) g; 28% of patients were receiving antiplatelets and 11% anticoagulants. Mean (range) prostate-specific antigen was 6.0 (0.3-43.5) ng/dL. Mean (range) operation time was 77 (28-178) minutes. Bladder calculi were found in 54 (5.6%) patients; all of them were successfully treated with cystolitholapaxy. Forty-eight (5%) patients required blood transfusion during or immediately after the HoLEP procedure. Overall, mean (SD) hemoglobin decreased from 14.6 (1.5) g/dL to 12.3 (2.1) g/dL (P <.001), and mean (SD) hematocrit decreased from 44.3% (4.7) to 37.7% (6.5) (P <.001). Neither hemoglobin nor hematocrit decreases were significantly different between patients receiving and not receiving antithrombotic therapy or BPH therapy. CONCLUSION: HoLEP is safe and has no remarkable impact on blood loss. Patients at high risk, such as those receiving antithrombotic therapy, had the same outcome than the rest regarding blood loss, although showed a higher transfusion rate. Operating time may influence hemoglobin decrease; therefore, it should be considered in patients with higher risk of bleeding.

Supresión androgénica máxima con acetato de abiraterona en cáncer de próstata hormonosensible / Maximal androgen deprivation with abiraterone acetate in hormone sensitive prostate cancer

OBJETIVO: El tratamiento del cáncer de próstata (CP) metastático ha permanecido inalterado durante más de 70 años fundamentado en la deprivación androgénica (DA). En 2015, a raíz de los estudios CHAARTED y STAMPEDE se estableció que la adición de 6 ciclos de docetaxel a la DA se asociaba significativamente con incremento de la supervivencia. En junio de 2017 los estudios LATITUDE y el brazo G del STAMPEDE demuestran que la adición de Abiraterona junto con Prednisona (5 mg/día) a DA se asocia también a un incremento significativo de supervivencia en los pacientes metastáticos. El presente trabajo analiza estos dos estudios. RESULTADOS: LATITUDE demostró una reducción relativa del riesgo de muerte del 38% (HR=0,62, 95% IC, 0,61-0,76) patente en la práctica totalidad de subgrupos. La reducción del riesgo relativo de progresión radiológica fue del 53 % (HR=0,47,IC 95% 0,39-0,55). Los objetivos secundarios como progresión de PSA, tiempo a quimioterapia o a nuevo evento esquelético también son significativamente retrasados. STAMPEDE también demuestra que la combinación con Abiraterona+prednisolona se asocia a un incremento relativo de SV del 37% (HR=0,63;95% IC, 0,52-0,76; p < 0,001) en pacientes M1, no así en los M0. La supervivencia libre de progresión fue muy mejorada en este brazo (HR=0,29;95% IC 0,25-0,34, p < 0,001). Los efectos secundarios referidos muestran el patrón conocido de exceso mineralcorticoide con incremento de HTA, hipokaliemia y elevación de enzimas hepáticas. CONCLUSIONES: La comparación indirecta de los trabajos de docetaxel y abiraterona confirma que tanto poblaciones, como resultados, son superponibles. Dos meta-análisis indirectos comparativos (>6000 pacientes) otorgan beneficio marginal a abiraterona. A favor de Abiraterona juega el ser una medicación oral, cómoda, con buen perfil de tolerancia y efectos secundarios de fácil manejo, útil en pacientes con frecuencia añosos y frágiles en los que la QT pudiera no estar indicada, aún a costa de una exposición al fármaco es más prolongada y de su actual precio. Futuros ensayos, en curso, determinará el perfil de pacientes idóneo, su posicionamiento en el tiempo o una potencial asociación de ambos

OBJECTIVES: Prostate cancer is linked to bone disease by two different entities. On one hand, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) usually causes osteoporosis, on the other a great number of patients with advanced prostate cancer will present bone bicametastases, that condition not only their vital prognosis but also an important quality of life deterioration. METHODS: We performed a bibliographic review on both the physiology and therapy of osteoporosis secondary to ADT and bone metastasis in prostatic neoplasias. RESULTS: Osteoporosis: Long term ADT is associated with osteopenia/osteoporosis in 80% of the patients, with a 5-20% incidence of osteoporotic fractures. We should monitor bone mineral density before starting ADT therapy and during treatment. Treatment is based on risk factors reduction, regular physical exercise, calcium and vitamin D supplements, and drugs such as biphosphonates or denosumab. Bone metastasis: Currently, both zolendronic acid and denosumab have approval for the prevention of skeletal events in patients with castration resistant prostate cancer (CPRC). Although the last one seems to be more effective, it is associated with a higher risk of hypocalcemia and jaw osteonecrosis so that the choice of drug must be individualized in every patient. The duration of treatment is not clear. Currently, the indication for the use of this drugs in earlier phases of advanced disease is not approved. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive management of the patient with advanced prostate cancer should include the study and treatment of osteoporosis and bone metastases. Currently, very effective therapies are available for both entities