Renal denervation in treatment-resistant essential hypertension. A randomized, SHAM-controlled, double-blinded 24-h blood pressure-based trial.

BACKGROUND: Renal denervation (RDN), treating resistant hypertension, has, in open trial design, been shown to lower blood pressure (BP) dramatically, but this was primarily with respect to office BP. METHOD: We conducted a SHAM-controlled, double-blind, randomized, single-center trial to establish efficacy data based on 24-h ambulatory BP measurements (ABPM). Inclusion criteria were daytime systolic ABPM at least 145 mmHg following 1 month of stable medication and 2 weeks of compliance registration. All RDN procedures were carried out by an experienced operator using the unipolar Medtronic Flex catheter (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, California, USA). RESULTS: We randomized 69 patients with treatment-resistant hypertension to RDN (n = 36) or SHAM (n = 33). Groups were well balanced at baseline. Mean baseline daytime systolic ABPM was 159 ±â€Š12 mmHg (RDN) and 159 ±â€Š14 mmHg (SHAM). Groups had similar reductions in daytime systolic ABPM compared with baseline at 3 months [-6.2 ±â€Š18.8 mmHg (RDN) vs. -6.0 ±â€Š13.5 mmHg (SHAM)] and at 6 months [-6.1 ±â€Š18.9 mmHg (RDN) vs. -4.3 ±â€Š15.1 mmHg (SHAM)]. Mean usage of antihypertensive medication (daily defined doses) at 3 months was equal [6.8 ±â€Š2.7 (RDN) vs. 7.0 ±â€Š2.5 (SHAM)].RDN performed at a single center and by a high-volume operator reduced ABPM to the same level as SHAM treatment and thus confirms the result of the HTN3 trial. CONCLUSION: Further, clinical use of RDN for treatment of resistant hypertension should await positive results from double-blinded, SHAM-controlled trials with multipolar ablation catheters or novel denervation techniques.

Effects of 12 weeks high dose vitamin D3 treatment on insulin sensitivity, beta cell function, and metabolic markers in patients with type 2 diabetes and vitamin D insufficiency - a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Vitamin D insufficiency is common in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Observational studies suggest that vitamin D plays a role in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. However, results of intervention studies have been inconsistent. We investigated the effects of improving vitamin D status on insulin sensitivity, insulin secretion, and inflammatory markers in patients with type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS/METHODS: A double blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial was conducted. Sixteen patients with type 2 diabetes and hypovitaminosis D were recruited. Eight patients received colecalciferol and (280 µg daily for 2 weeks, 140 µg daily for 10 weeks) and 8 patients received identical placebo tablets for 12 weeks. Before and after intervention, patients underwent IVGTT, hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp, assessment of baseline high-frequency insulin pulsatility, glucose-entrained insulin pulsatility, DXA scans, 24-hour-ambulatory blood pressure monitorings, and fasting blood samples. RESULTS: Serum-25(OH) vitamin D and serum-1,25(OH)2 vitamin D increased significantly after 12 weeks in the intervention group (p=0.01, p=0.004). Serum-25(OH) vitamin D was also significantly higher in the vitamin D group compared to the placebo group (p=0.02) after intervention. Although no significant changes in insulin sensitivity, inflammation, blood pressure, lipid profile, or HbA1c were found, we observed borderline (p between 0.05 and 0.10) improvements of insulin secretion, in terms of c-peptide levels, first phase incremental AUC insulin and insulin secretory burst mass. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in vitamin D status does not improve insulin resistance, blood pressure, inflammation or HbA1c, but might increase insulin secretion in patients with established type 2 diabetes.