Feasibility and Safety of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Resected Colorectal Cancer in Patients With Renal Insufficiency: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data from Five Japanese Large-scale Clinical Trials.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The incidence of chemotherapy-related adverse events in colorectal cancer patients with renal insufficiency has been compared to patients with normal renal function in only a few studies. The purpose of this analysis was to verify the feasibility and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy for postoperative colorectal cancer patients with renal insufficiency. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adverse events and discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with curatively resected locally advanced colorectal cancer were examined using a combined database of individual patient data obtained from five large-scale clinical trials (n=4,106). The renal function of patients was classified into Level (L) 1-2: ≥60 ml/min and L3-4: <60 ml/min. RESULTS: As Grade 3 adverse events, hematological toxicities, such as neutropenia and anemia, and gastrointestinal disorders, such as diarrhea and vomiting, were significantly more frequent in the L3-4 group. Moreover, the time-to-treatment discontinuation in the L3-4 group was higher (hazard ratio=1.21, p=0.0012). T factor, N factor, and creatinine clearance level were found to be independent risk factors for the discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy. In the subgroup analysis of FOLFOX, neutropenia and diarrhea were significantly common in the L3-4 group, but neurotoxicities were not different. There was no significant difference in the discontinuation of adjuvant FOLFOX. CONCLUSION: Adverse events of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resected colorectal cancer were associated with renal insufficiencies. Since adverse events have the potential to shorten the duration of treatment, especially when using chemotherapy without oxaliplatin, careful management, including dose reduction, may be important in patients with renal insufficiency.

The clinical impacts of postoperative complications after colon cancer surgery for the clinical course of adjuvant treatment and survival.

AIM: We investigated whether or not postoperative complications (POCs) themselves have a negative survival impact or indirectly worsen the survival due to insufficient adjuvant chemotherapy in a pooled analysis of two large phase III studies performed in Japan PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study examined the patients who enrolled in 1304, phase III study comparing the efficacy of 6 and 12 months of capecitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer patients and in 882, a phase III study to confirm the tolerability of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and l-leucovorin in Japanese stage II/III colon cancer patients. In our study, POCs were defined as the following major surgical complications: anastomotic leakage, pneumonia, bowel obstruction/ileus, surgical site infection, postoperative bleeding, urinary tract infection, and fistula. Patients were classified as those with POCs (C group) and those without POCs (NC group). RESULTS: A total of 2095 patients were examined in the present study. POCs were observed in 169 patients (8.1%). The overall survival (OS) rates at 5 years after surgery were 75.3% in the C group and 86.5% in the NC group (p = 0.0017). The hazard ratio of POCs for the OS in multivariate analysis was 1.70 (95% confidence interval, 1.19 to 2.45; p = 0.0040). The time to adjuvant treatment failure (TTF) of adjuvant chemotherapy was similar between the groups, being 68.6% in the C group and 67.1% in the NC group for the 6-month continuation rate of adjuvant chemotherapy. The dose reduction rate of adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant treatment suspension rate were also similar between the groups (C vs. NC groups: 45.0% vs. 48.7%, p = 0.3520; and 52.7% vs. 55.0%, p = 0.5522, respectively). CONCLUSION: POCs were associated with a poor prognosis but did not affect the intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy. These results suggested that POCs themselves negatively influence the survival.

Controlling Nutritional Status Score Serves as a Prognosticator in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Optimal Timing of Evaluation of Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Usefulness of various nutritional indices for management of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has been reported. Although Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is among promising indices to predict outcome, the optimal timing for its measurement during the perioperative period remains unknown. Here the prognostic value of the CONUT score was assessed among patients with ESCC. METHODS: We analyzed 464 patients who underwent subtotal esophagectomy of ESCC, of which 276 patients were treated with neoadjuvant treatment (NAT). The significance of the associations between candidate parameters including the CONUT score and postoperative prognosis were evaluated. RESULT: Among the 25 candidate predictors, the preoperative CONUT score had the highest correlation with overall survival (OS) after surgery. Patients were categorized as follows: normal, mild, and moderate or severe, on the basis of the preoperative CONUT score. OS was significantly shortened as the CONUT score worsened. Multivariable analysis revealed that the CONUT scores of the subgroups mild (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.69) and moderate or severe (HR 2.18) were independent predictors of poor prognosis for OS. Furthermore, in an analysis limited to patients who underwent NAT, OS was significantly shortened as the preoperative CONUT score worsened. On the contrary, there was no significant difference in RFS among patient groups stratified by the CONUT score determined before NAT. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that the preoperative CONUT score serves as a prognosticator in resectable ESCC. The preoperative CONUT value was more useful than that before NAT in patients administered NAT.

A prospective trial to evaluate treatment effects of a ß-hydroxy-ß-methylbutyrate containing nutrient for leakage at the anastomotic site after esophagectomy.

Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy is associated with prolonged hospitalization and increased medical cost. Additionally, it sometimes leads to a fatal condition and impaired postoperative quality of life. During the process of wound healing, ß-hydroxy-ß-methylbutyrate (HMB) is important for collagen biosynthesis. An open-label prospective intervention trial has been designed to evaluate the treatment effect of an enteral nutrient containing HMB with arginine and glutamine (Abound, Abbott Japan Co., Ltd.) for leakage at the anastomotic site after esophagectomy. Patients in whom leakage at the anastomotic site developed within 14 days after esophagectomy are eligible and Abound (24 g) is administered for 14 days through an enteral feeding tube. The target sample size is 10. The primary endpoint is duration between diagnosis and cure of leakage. Surgical procedure, safety, length of fasting, drainage placement and hospital stay, and nutritional status are determined as secondary endpoints. A historical control consisting of 20 patients who had leakage at the anastomotic site after esophagectomy between 2005 and 2018 at Nagoya University Hospital is compared with enrolled patients.

Biological and conditional factors should be included when defining criteria for resectability for patients with pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate novel resectability criteria for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) proposed by the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) by comparing them with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. METHODS: 369 patients who underwent upfront surgery for PDAC were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS) of each group as defined by either of the guidelines were compared and preoperative prognostic factors for OS were identified. RESULTS: Based on the IAP-criteria, 157 patients were classified as resectable (R), 192 as borderline resectable (BR) and 20 as unresectable (UR), with the median survival time (MST) of 40 months, 17 and 11, respectively. In contrast to the NCCN-criteria, BR demonstrated significantly better OS than UR (P = 0.023) under the IAP-criteria. Performance status ≥2 (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.47, P = 0.014) and lymph node metastasis suspected by imaging (HR: 1.55, P = 0.003) were identified as independent prognostic factors by the multivariate analysis along with portal or arterial invasion, while carbohydrate antigen 19-9 ≥ 500 U/ml was not (HR: 1.23, P = 0.190). CONCLUSION: The IAP-criteria, which includes biological and conditional factors, resulted in superior separation of survival curves stratified by the resectablity when compared with the NCCN-criteria.

Proposal of a Scoring Scale to Estimate Risk of the Discontinuation of S-1 Adjuvant Monotherapy in Patients with Stage II to III Gastric Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Dataset Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Discontinuation of postoperative S-1 adjuvant monotherapy is a frequent problem in the management of patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: A total of 355 stage II/III gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy and adjuvant S-1 were retrospectively analyzed using a multicenter dataset. We randomly assigned patients into either discovery or validation cohort in a 2:1 ratio. In the discovery cohort, 29 parameters were assessed as candidate factors to predict discontinuation of S-1 adjuvant within 6 months. A scoring system was designed using independent risk factors identified by the multivariate analysis. Reproducibility was tested in the validation cohort. RESULTS: Overall, 92 patients (25.9%) discontinued the treatment within 6 months because of adverse effects. Age, preoperative urea nitrogen (UN) and the preoperative albumin-to-bilirubin index (ALBI) showed the highest area under the curve (AUC) for the discontinuation of S-1 adjuvant within 6 months in each category: body status, blood tests and indices. In the multivariate analysis, age ≥ 64 years, preoperative UN ≥ 15.2 mg/dl and preoperative ALBI ≥ -0.265 were identified as independent risk factors. A scoring scale consisting of these three factors was developed for the prediction of drug discontinuation and demonstrated a greater AUC (0.728) than that of each of the three constituents. The time to treatment discontinuation decreased incrementally as the risk score increased. The reproducible findings were confirmed in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: We identified risk factors and developed a scoring scale to predict S-1 adjuvant monotherapy discontinuation in patients with stage II/III gastric cancer.

＜Editors' Choice＞ Efficacy of enteral nutrients containing ß-hydroxy-ß-methylbutyrate, glutamine, and arginine for the patients with anastomotic leakage after gastrectomy: study protocol of a multicenter phase II clinical trial.

Anastomotic leakage is a major cause of prolonged hospitalization after gastrectomy and sometimes leads to fatal complications, such as abdominal abscess and sepsis. Arginine, glutamine, and ß-hydroxy-ß-methylbutyrate (HMB) are indispensable for biosynthesis of collagen, which plays an important role in the process of wound healing. However, treatment effects of amino acid supplements containing HMB on the healing process of anastomotic leakage after gastrectomy remain unclear. We designed an open-label, multicenter, phase II clinical trial to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of an enteral amino acid supplement consisting of arginine, glutamine, and HMB (Abound, Abbott Japan Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) in patients with anastomotic leakage after gastrectomy. Patients who are diagnosed with anastomotic leakage within 14 days after gastrectomy are eligible for this trial and the target sample size is 20. A pack of Abound is administered twice a day for 2 weeks. The primary objective of this clinical trial is to determine the length of time between diagnosis and cure of anastomotic leakage. The secondary endpoints include the safety of Abound, duration of drainage placement and fasting, postoperative hospital stay, surgical procedure, and blood test data. Variables are compared between enrolled patients and a historical control consisting of 20 patients who underwent gastrectomy between 2004 and 2016 at Nagoya University Hospital. We herein describe the study design and the concept in this protocol paper.

Risk Factors for Peritoneal Recurrence in Stage II to III Colon Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Most previous reports to analyze risk factors for peritoneal recurrence in patients with colon cancer have been observational studies of a population-based cohort. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the risk factors for peritoneal recurrence in patients with stage II to III colon cancer who underwent curative resection. DESIGN: This was a pooled analysis using a combined database obtained from 3 large phase III randomized trials (N = 3714). SETTINGS: Individual patient data were collected from the Japanese Foundation for Multidisciplinary Treatment of Cancer clinical trials 7, 15, and 33, which evaluated the benefits of postoperative 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapies in patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS: We included patients who had stage II to III colon cancer and underwent curative resection with over D2 lymph node dissection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcomes measured were risk factors for peritoneal recurrence without other organ metastasis after curative surgery. RESULTS: Peritoneal recurrence occurred in 2.3% (86/3714) of all patients undergoing curative resection. Mean duration from operation to peritoneal recurrence was 17.0 ± 10.3 months. Of these patients with peritoneal recurrence, 29 patients (34%) had recurrence in ≥1 other organ. Multivariate analysis showed that age (≥60 y: HR = 0.531; p = 0.0182), pathological T4 (HR = 3.802; p < 0.0001), lymph node involvement (HR = 3.491; p = 0.0002), and lymphadenectomy (D2: HR = 1.801; p = 0.0356) were independent predictors of peritoneal recurrence. The overall survival was lower in patients who developed peritoneal recurrence than in those with other recurrence (HR = 1.594; p = 0.002). LIMITATIONS: The regimens of adjuvant chemotherapy were limited to oral 5-fluorouracil. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings clarified the risk factors for peritoneal recurrence in patients who underwent curative resection for colon cancer. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A609.

Significance of SYT8 For the Detection, Prediction, and Treatment of Peritoneal Metastasis From Gastric Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To develop novel diagnostic and therapeutic targets specific for peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer (GC). BACKGROUND: Advanced GC frequently recurs because of undetected micrometastases even after curative resection. Peritoneal metastasis has been the most frequent recurrent pattern after gastrectomy and is incurable. METHODS: We conducted a recurrence pattern-specific transcriptome analysis in an independent cohort of 16 patients with stage III GC who underwent curative gastrectomy and adjuvant S-1 for screening candidate molecules specific for peritoneal metastasis of GC. Next, another 340 patients were allocated to discovery and validation sets (1:2) to evaluate the diagnostic and predictive value of the candidate molecule. The results of quantitative reverse-transcription PCR and immunohistochemical analysis were correlated with clinical characteristics and survival. The effects of siRNA-mediated knockdown on phenotype and fluorouracil sensitivity of GC cells were evaluated in vitro, and the therapeutic effects of siRNAs were evaluated using a mouse xenograft model. RESULTS: Synaptotagmin VIII (SYT8) was identified as a candidate biomarker specific to peritoneal metastasis. In the discovery set, the optimal cut-off of SYT8 expression was established as 0.005. Expression levels of SYT8 mRNA in GC tissues were elevated in the validation set comprising patients with peritoneal recurrence or metastasis. SYT8 levels above the cut-off value were significantly and specifically associated with peritoneal metastasis, and served as an independent prognostic marker for peritoneal recurrence-free survival of patients with stage II/III GC. The survival difference between patients with SYT8 levels above and below the cut-off was associated with patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. Inhibition of SYT8 expression by GC cells correlated with decreased invasion, migration, and fluorouracil resistance. Intraperitoneal administration of SYT8-siRNA inhibited the growth of peritoneal nodules and prolonged survival of mice engrafted with GC cells. CONCLUSIONS: SYT8 represents a promising target for the detection, prediction, and treatment of peritoneal metastasis of GC.

Preoperative Albumin-Bilirubin Grade Predicts Recurrences After Radical Gastrectomy in Patients with pT2-4 Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score was initially developed for assessing liver dysfunction severity and was suggested to have prognostic value in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of ALBI grade in patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) after radical gastrectomy. METHODS: This study included 283 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for pT2-4 GC without preoperative treatment. ALBI was calculated as follows: (log10 bilirubin (µmol/L) × 0.66) + (albumin (g/L) × -0.0852) and categorized into grades 1 (≤-2.60), 2 (-2.60<, ≤-1.39) and 3 (-1.39<). RESULTS: The median ALBI score was -2.96, and a number of patients in ALBI grades 1, 2 and 3 were 228, 55 and 0, respectively. Patients with ALBI grade 2 had a lower administration rate of adjuvant chemotherapy than those with ALBI grade 1, whereas no significant differences were found in morbidity rate and disease stage. The ALBI grade 2 group was more likely to have shorter disease-specific and disease-free survival compared with the ALBI grade 1 group. Multivariable analysis identified ALBI grade 2 as an independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival (hazard ratio 1.97, 95% confidence interval 1.10-3.47, p = 0.0242). Survival differences between ALBI grade 1 and 2 groups were increased in the patient subset that received adjuvant chemotherapy. ALBI grade 2 was correlated with a shortened duration of administration of postoperative S-1 adjuvant. CONCLUSIONS: ALBI grade serves as a simple and promising predictive factor for disease-free and disease-specific survival in patients with pT2-4 GC after radical gastrectomy.

Evaluation and proposal of novel resectability criteria for pancreatic cancer established by the Japan Pancreas Society.

BACKGROUND: The guidelines for the classification of the resectability of pancreatic cancer established by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network can be difficult to utilize in clinical practice. We evaluated novel criteria proposed by the Japan Pancreas Society. METHODS: We analyzed 382 patients with pancreatic cancer between 2001 and 2015 for survival differences among subgroups classified according to the Japan Pancreas Society classification. Overall survival and disease-free survival were expressed as median values and compared with data based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network classification, and differences in initial patterns of recurrence were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall survival times according to the Japan Pancreas Society criteria were 34.2, 29.7, 17.3, 14.3, and 15.8 months for the groups defined as resectable, resectable with portal vein invasion, borderline resectable with portal vein invasion, borderline resectable with arterial invasion, and unresectable by locally advanced disease respectively. The overall survival of the resectable group was better than those of the borderline resectable with portal vein invasion or borderline resectable with arterial invasion groups (P < .0001); however, the borderline resectable with portal vein invasion, borderline resectable with arterial invasion, and unresectable by locally advanced groups showed no differences in overall survival. The resectable group showed a tendency toward better survival than the resectable with portal vein invasion group (P = .058). The median overall survival times according to the classic 2012 National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria were 30.5, 20.5, 15.8, and 13.8 months for the resectable, portal invasion, common hepatic artery and superior mesenteric artery invasion groups, respectively. Each survival curve was clearly separate. The borderline resectable with arterial invasion and unresectable by locally advanced groups exhibited high local recurrence rates (42.0% and 44.8%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The Japan Pancreas Society criteria, which are simpler, predicted survival differences between the resectable group and the other subgroups. Our data suggest that cancer patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (borderline resectable with portal vein invasion and borderline resectable with arterial invasion) can be managed as a single subset.