Phase I trial of selenium plus chemotherapy in gynecologic cancers.

PURPOSE: Preclinical studies performed in our laboratory have shown that high-dose selenium inhibits the development of carboplatin drug resistance in an ovarian cancer mouse xenograft model. Based on these data, as well as the potential serious toxicities of supranutritional doses of selenium, a phase I trial of a combination of selenium/carboplatin/paclitaxel was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose, safety, and effects of selenium on carboplatin pharmacokinetics in the treatment of chemo-naive women with gynecologic cancers. Correlative studies were performed to identify gene targets of selenium. METHODS: Chemo-naïve patients with gynecologic malignancy received selenious acid IV on day 1 followed by carboplatin IV and paclitaxel IV on day 3. A standard 3 + 3 dose-escalating design was used for addition of selenium to standard dose chemotherapy. Concentrations of selenium in plasma and carboplatin in plasma ultrafiltrate were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were enrolled and 291 treatment cycles were administered. Selenium was administered as selenious acid to 9 cohorts of patients with selenium doses ranging from 50 µg to 5000 µg. Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (66.7%), febrile neutropenia (2.2%), pain (20.0%), infection (13.3%), neurologic (11.1%), and pulmonary adverse effects (11.1%). The maximum tolerated dose of selenium was not reached. Selenium had no effect on carboplatin pharmacokinetics. Correlative studies showed post-treatment downregulation of RAD51AP1, a protein involved in DNA repair, in both cancer cell lines and patient tumors. CONCLUSION: Overall, the addition of selenium to carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy is safe and well tolerated, and does not alter carboplatin pharmacokinetics. A 5000 µg dose of elemental selenium as selenious acid is suggested as the dose to be evaluated in a phase II trial.

Combination SGLT2 inhibitor and GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy: a complementary approach to the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Among persons with type 2 diabetes (t2d), the development of glucose intolerance involves dysfunction in several organs and tissues, including the muscle, liver, pancreas, kidney, gastrointestinal tract, adipose tissue, and brain. individuals with t2d typically have a number of comorbidities, including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and being overweight or obese, and are, consequently, at high cardiovascular risk. guidelines recommend a comprehensive care strategy that includes treatment of diabetes-related complications and comorbidities beyond those related to hyperglycemia. use of glucose-lowering therapies with complementary activities that address multiple facets of the disease may improve long-term outcomes for patients with t2d. two recent drug classes developed for use in t2d, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (glp-1ras) and sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (sglt2) inhibitors, have been shown in clinical trials to have beneficial effects on glycemic control, body weight, cardiovascular risk factors, and (for liraglutide, semaglutide, and empagliflozin) cardiovascular outcomes, while having an acceptable safety profile. between them, these drug classes directly or indirectly affect many of the organs and tissues involved in the pathogenesis of t2d, and their beneficial effects on glycemic- and cardiovascular-related parameters are likely to be complementary and potentially additive. in the largest clinical trial of a glp-1ra and an sglt2 inhibitor in combination (duration-8), patients with t2d (n = 685) who received exenatide plus dapagliflozin added to their treatment regimen for 28 weeks had significantly greater reductions from baseline in glycated hemoglobin, body weight, and systolic blood pressure compared with patients who received either drug as monotherapy. this review summarizes the complementary aspects of these drug classes and presents the available data among patients receiving dual therapy with a glp-1ra and an sglt2 inhibitor.

Efficacy of teriparatide in patients with resolved secondary hyperparathyroidism due to vitamin D deficiency.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of at least 1 year of teriparatide therapy on bone mineral density (BMD), T-scores, and rates of occurrence of fractures in patients with a history of resolved secondary hyperparathyroidism due to vitamin D deficiency and to compare its efficacy with that in patients without a history of resolved secondary hyperparathyroidism. METHODS: In this retrospective study based on a search of electronic medical records, we collected the following data: patient demographics, doses of calcium and vitamin D supplementation, duration of teriparatide treatment, history and treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism, BMD information, T-scores, and any history of fractures. Paired and unpaired t tests, the Fisher exact test, and the Wilcoxon rank sum test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients (7 with a history of resolved secondary hyperparathyroidism due to vitamin D deficiency and 88 without such a history) fulfilled the study inclusion criteria. Baseline characteristics (demographics, median calcium and vitamin D supplementation doses, mean BMD, mean T-scores, and fracture rates before teriparatide therapy) were similar between the 2 groups. In comparison with baseline data, after a mean of 21 months of teriparatide therapy: (1) hip BMD and T-scores did not change in either study group (with no significant differences between the 2 groups), (2) spine BMD and T-scores significantly improved in both study groups (with no significant differences between them), and (3) wrist T-scores significantly worsened in both study groups (with wrist BMD significantly lower in patients without a history of secondary hyperparathyroidism). No patients with a history of secondary hyperparathyroidism sustained a fracture while receiving teriparatide therapy versus 6 of 88 patients without a history of secondary hyperparathyroidism (P = .624). CONCLUSION: Patients with a history of resolved secondary hyperparathyroidism attributable to vitamin D deficiency responded to teriparatide therapy in a fashion similar to patients without such a history.

Off-label use of exenatide for the management of insulin-resistant type 1 diabetes mellitus in an obese patient with human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Exenatide is an incretin mimetic indicated for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in combination with a sulfonylurea, a thiazolidinedione, metformin, or metformin plus a sulfonylurea or thiazolidinedione. Exenatide lowers postprandial blood glucose levels by stimulating glucose-dependent insulin secretion, inhibiting glucagon secretion, slowing gastric emptying, and increasing satiety. Therapy with exenatide often results in weight loss, which further assists in decreasing insulin resistance. This feature makes the drug an attractive therapeutic option for obese patients. We report the successful off-label use of exenatide in an obese, 40-year-old man with type 1 diabetes and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection who had gastrointestinal intolerance to pramlintide. The patient had experienced a dramatic weight gain secondary to his antiretroviral drugs. This weight gain led to insulin resistance and the development of type 2 diabetes; thus he had characteristics of both types 1 and 2 diabetes, or double diabetes. Before the start of exenatide therapy, he weighed 123 kg, had a body mass index of 42.3 kg/m(2), and had a suboptimal hemoglobin A(1c) value of 8.7%. After 11 months of therapy, the patient lost 24 kg (19.5% of his body weight) and achieved a hemoglobin A(1c) value of 7.3%. His basal insulin requirement was reduced by 25%, and his use of short-acting insulin before breakfast and before dinner was discontinued. In addition, the patient's quality of life substantially improved, as he was able to return to work and exercise after being nearly incapacitated by his weight. To our knowledge, this is the first published case report of the use of exenatide in a patient with type 1 diabetes mellitus or human immunodeficiency virus infection. Given this experience, exenatide may prove to be a useful alternative in selected patients with type 1 diabetes.

Drug-induced thyrotoxic periodic paralysis.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of iodine-induced (Jod-Basedow) hyperthyroidism leading to thyrotoxic periodic paralysis (TPP). CASE SUMMARY: A 64-year-old white male, one day status-post-cardiac catheterization, presented to the local emergency department with profound weakness of his extremities and an inability to stand on his own. Pertinent laboratory test results included a potassium level of 3.0 mEq/L. Treatments of oral and intravenous potassium supplementation resulted in his complete recovery. Two days later he was diagnosed with hyperthyroidism and subsequently treated with nadolol 40 mg daily and methimazole 20 mg daily. At time of writing, the patient remained euthyroid, receiving no antithyroid medications. There had been no further reports of paralysis in the 6 years since his original presentation. The Naranjo probability scale indicated a probable relationship between the patient's episode of TPP and his exposure to the iodinated contrast dye. DISCUSSION: TPP is an uncommon manifestation in white patients with hyperthyroidism. Iodine-induced TPP is even more rare, with only 2 such cases reported as of November 2, 2005. In this case, Jod-Basedow hyperthyroidism was induced by the iodine-containing dye that the patient received during cardiac catheterization. Soon after the dye was administered, he developed TPP. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be aware not only of potential causes of drug-induced thyroid disease, but also of the potential for drug-induced hyperthyroidism leading to TPP. The diagnosis of TPP should be considered in patients presenting with acute onset of extremity weakness or paralysis and hypokalemia. Quick diagnosis and prompt treatment of TPP can prevent life-threatening complications of this treatable and curable disorder.