Recurrent Altered Mental State Associated with Nonhepatic Hyperammonemia Presented in an Elderly Female Patient: Probable Late-Onset Urea Cycle Disorder.

Altered mentality associated with hyperammonemia is usually diagnosed in patients with liver disease. Nonhepatic hyperammonemia may be present in critically ill patients or may be caused by high protein diets or certain drugs. Urea cycle disorders (UCDs) rarely present with altered mentality with hyperammonemia in adult patients. An 82-year-old female visited our hospital with complaints of abnormal behavior and confusion. Routine blood tests revealed elevated serum ammonia. Her mentality and serum ammonia level normalized after lactulose enema and she was discharged thereafter. However, she was later re-admitted because of recurrent altered mentality. Amino acid analysis revealed that serum levels of ornithine and glutamine increased significantly, whereas the levels of alanine and glutamic acid increased slightly, and the levels of arginine, lysine, and citrulline were normal, which were probably caused by reduced activity of the mitochondrial ornithine carrier-1. Although our patient was not diagnosed genetically, this case illustrates the under-recognized fact that UCD can occur in a senile age. Clinical suspicion of UCDs in patients with hyperammonemia is critical for early diagnosis and to prevent the significant neurologic sequelae.

Characteristics of the Drip-and-Ship Paradigm for Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke in South Korea.

BACKGROUND: Data on the drip-and-ship paradigm in Korea are limited. The present study aimed to evaluate the use of the drip-and-ship paradigm and the time delays and outcomes associated with the paradigm in Korea. METHODS: We used data from the Clinical Research Center for Stroke-5 registry between January 2011 and March 2014. Among patients treated with tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA), the use of the drip-and-ship paradigm was evaluated, and time delays and functional outcomes at 3 months were compared between patients treated with the paradigm and those treated directly at visits. RESULTS: Among 1843 patients who met the eligibility criteria, 244 patients (13.2%) were treated with the drip-and-ship paradigm. Subsequent endovascular recanalization therapy was used in 509 patients (27.6%). The median time from symptom onset to groin puncture was greater in patients treated with the paradigm than in those treated directly at visits (305 versus 200 minutes, P < .001). In multivariate analysis, the risks of unfavorable functional outcomes and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage were higher inpatients treated with the paradigm than in those directly treated at visits (odds ratio [OR] 2.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.50-3.08; P < .001 and OR 1.78; 95% CI, 1.02-3.12; P = .041, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In Korea, the drip-and-ship paradigm was used in less than 15% of all patients treated with tPA. The use of the paradigm might cause an increase in the onset-to-groin puncture time. Additionally, clinical outcomes might be worse in patients treated with the paradigm than in those treated directly at visits.