Preoperative sequential short-course radiation therapy and FOLFOX chemotherapy versus long-course chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (SOLAR trial).

BACKGROUND: Preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy has been widely used as an effective treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), leading to a significant reduction in pelvic recurrence rates. Because early administration of intensive chemotherapy for LARC has more advantages than adjuvant chemotherapy, total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has been introduced and evaluated to determine whether it can improve tumor response or treatment outcomes. This study aims to investigate whether short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) followed by intensive chemotherapy improves oncologic outcomes compared with traditional preoperative long-course chemoradiotherapy (CRT). METHODS: A multicenter randomized phase II trial involving 364 patients with LARC (cT3-4, cN+, or presence of extramural vascular invasion) will be conducted. Patients will be randomly assigned to the experimental or control arm at a ratio of 1:1. Participants in the experimental arm will receive SCRT (25 Gy in 5 fractions, daily) followed by four cycles of FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and folinic acid) as a neoadjuvant treatment, and those in the control arm will receive conventional radiotherapy (45-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions, 5 times a week) concurrently with capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil. As a mandatory surgical procedure, total mesorectal excision will be performed 2-5 weeks from the last cycle of chemotherapy in the experimental arm and 6-8 weeks after the last day of radiotherapy in the control arm. The primary endpoint is 3-year disease-free survival, and the secondary endpoints are tumor response, overall survival, toxicities, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: This is the first Korean randomized controlled study comparing SCRT-based TNT with traditional preoperative LC-CRT for LARC. The involvement of experienced colorectal surgeons ensures high-quality surgical resection. SCRT followed by FOLFOX chemotherapy is expected to improve disease-free survival compared with CRT, with potential advantages in tumor response, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered at Clinical Research Information under the identifier Service KCT0004874 on April 02, 2020, and at Clinicaltrial.gov under the identifier NCT05673772 on January 06, 2023.

Initial experience of preoperative short-course radiotherapy followed by oxaliplatin-based consolidation chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: We analyzed the safety and feasibility of preoperative short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) followed by consolidation chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). METHODS: From April 2018 to May 2019, 19 patients with LARC were treated with SCRT followed by three cycles of consolidation chemotherapy with leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX6) before surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy relied on oxaliplatin. Tumor response, patient compliance, and toxicities were analyzed. RESULTS: The median age was 60 years (range 44-71), and 16 of the patients were male. The median tumor height was 5 cm (range 0-9) from anal verge. All patients received a total dose of 25 Gy in five fractions. The number of cycles of FOLFOX6 before surgery was three in 17, four in one, five in one. Five patients required dose reductions in consolidation chemotherapy. The median interval between initiation of SCRT and surgery was 10.6 weeks (range 8.6-16.4). A pathologic complete response was seen in two patients (11%). Grade III toxicities to the preoperative treatment were seen in five patients (26%): diarrhea in two, a decreased white blood cell count in one, and anemia in two. Postoperative complications arising within 30 days developed in five patients (26%). During the median follow-up period of 20.4 months, there was no tumor recurrence. CONCLUSION: Preoperative SCRT followed by oxaliplatin-based consolidation chemotherapy showed acceptable toxicity and feasibility in patients with LARC. Prospective randomized trials are warranted to verify the efficacy and safety of this treatment strategy compared with conventional long-course concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Clinical outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in patients with pre-existing liver diseases: A multicenter study in South Korea.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread rapidly worldwide, the implication of pre-existing liver disease on the outcome of COVID-19 remains unresolved.
. METHODS: A total of 1,005 patients who were admitted to five tertiary hospitals in South Korea with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were included in this study. Clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients with coexisting liver disease as well as the predictors of disease severity and mortality of COVID-19 were assessed.
. RESULTS: Of the 47 patients (4.7%) who had liver-related comorbidities, 14 patients (1.4%) had liver cirrhosis. Liver cirrhosis was more common in COVID-19 patients with severe pneumonia than in those with non-severe pneumonia (4.5% vs. 0.9%, P=0.006). Compared to patients without liver cirrhosis, a higher proportion of patients with liver cirrhosis required oxygen therapy; were admitted to the intensive care unit; had septic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or acute kidney injury; and died (P<0.05). The overall survival rate was significantly lower in patients with liver cirrhosis than in those without liver cirrhosis (log-rank test, P=0.003). Along with old age and diabetes, the presence of liver cirrhosis was found to be an independent predictor of severe disease (odds ratio, 4.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-17.02;P=0.026) and death (hazard ratio, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.04-9.30; P=0.042) in COVID-19 patients.
. CONCLUSION: This study suggests liver cirrhosis is a significant risk factor for COVID-19. Stronger personal protection and more intensive treatment for COVID-19 are recommended in these patients.

Effects of Branched-Chain Amino Acid (BCAA) Supplementation on the Progression of Advanced Liver Disease: A Korean Nationwide, Multicenter, Prospective, Observational, Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Clinical evidence for the benefits of branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) is lacking in advanced liver disease. We evaluated the potential benefits of long-term oral BCAA supplementation in patients with advanced liver disease. METHODS: Liver cirrhosis patients with Child-Pugh (CP) scores from 8 to 10 were prospectively recruited from 13 medical centers. Patients supplemented with 12.45 g of daily BCAA granules over 6 months, and patients consuming a regular diet were assigned to the BCAA and control groups, respectively. The effects of BCAA supplementation were evaluated using the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, CP score, serum albumin, serum bilirubin, incidence of cirrhosis-related events, and event-free survival for 24 months. RESULTS: A total of 124 patients was analyzed: 63 in the BCAA group and 61 in the control group. The MELD score (p = 0.009) and CP score (p = 0.011) significantly improved in the BCAA group compared to the control group over time. However, the levels of serum albumin and bilirubin in the BCAA group did not improve during the study period. The cumulative event-free survival was significantly improved in the BCAA group compared to the control group (HR = 0.389, 95% CI = 0.221-0.684, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Long-term supplementation with oral BCAAs can potentially improve liver function and reduce major complications of cirrhosis in patients with advanced liver disease.

ARID3A Positivity Correlated With Favorable Prognosis in Patients With Residual Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Recent studies have shown a marked increase of AT-rich interactive domain 3A (ARID3A) in colon cancer tissue compared to normal colon mucosa. However, the role of ARID3A has not yet been determined in rectal cancer. We, therefore, investigated the clinical relevance of ARID3A expression in patients with residual rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-four patients who underwent surgical resection for residual rectal cancer after NACRT were analyzed. ARID3A expression was evaluated using immunohistochemistry on whole-tissue sections. KRAS exon 2 (codons 12 and 13) and BRAF V600E mutation status were determined using polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: ARID3A positivity was found in 91 cases (64.5%), and it correlated with absence of perineural invasion (p=0.031), longer disease-free survival (DFS) (p=0.048) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p=0.006). However, ARID3A positivity was not correlated with KRAS (p=0.231) or BRAF mutation status (p=0.577). In multivariate analysis, ARID3A positivity was independently associated with a favorable CSS (p=0.035), but not DFS (p=0.051). CONCLUSION: ARID3A positivity can predict favorable prognosis in patients with residual rectal cancer after NACRT.

Selecting patients for hyperthermia combined with preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the role of hyperthermia combined with preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) according to hypoxic marker expression. METHODS: One hundred and nine LARC patients with tissue blocks available for immunohistochemical assessment of carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA9) expression were reviewed. CA9 expression was considered positive when the staining percentage of tumor cells was >25% (n = 31). Pelvic radiotherapy with a total dose of 39.6-45 Gy was delivered concurrently with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Hyperthermia was administered to 52 patients twice a week during CCRT. Treatment response and outcomes were compared between hyperthermochemoradiotherapy (HCRT) and CCRT groups. RESULTS: In patients with positive CA9 expression, the rates of downstaging (p = 0.060) and pathologic complete response (p = 0.064) tended to be higher in the HCRT group than in the CCRT group. Distant metastasis-free survival (p = 0.029) and cancer-specific survival (p = 0.020) were significantly worse in tumors with both positive CA9 expression and poor tumor response. Negative CA9 expression, presence of major tumor response, and the use of hyperthermia were significant favorable prognostic factors for cancer-specific survival after the first recurrence in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperthermia might selectively enhance the preoperative treatment response in LARC with positive CA9 expression and offset the negative effect of hypoxia on prognosis. Pretreatment evaluation of hypoxia could aid in the selection of patients who might benefit from hyperthermia.

Clinical outcomes of mild hyperthermia for locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative radiochemotherapy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this report was to determine the impact of hyperthermia (HT) on preoperative radiochemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1996 and 2007, 235 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were treated with concurrent preoperative radiochemotherapy with or without HT. The total dose of radiotherapy was 39.6 Gy for 109 patients (group A) and 45 Gy for 126 patients (group B). Two or three cycles of chemotherapy were administered. Hyperthermia was given immediately after radiotherapy. RESULTS: In the HT subgroup of group A, more patients achieved down-staging of T stage when compared to the non-HT subgroup (57.9% versus 38%, p = 0.047). For the cN+ subgroup of all patients, the number of patients with ypN+ were significantly less in the HT subgroup (25% versus 50%, p = 0.022). In group A, HT appeared to reduce distant metastasis, increase disease-free survival, and improve overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: HT seemed to increase the response of both primary tumour and lymph nodes to preoperative radiochemotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The relationship between increased response by HT and survival should be confirmed by a large prospective randomised trial.