Liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin versus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic biliary tract cancer after progression on gemcitabine plus cisplatin (NIFTY): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2b study.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with advanced biliary tract cancer who have progressed on gemcitabine plus cisplatin is dismal. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of second-line liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic biliary tract cancer that has progressed on gemcitabine plus cisplatin. METHODS: This multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2b (NIFTY) study was done at five academic institutions in South Korea and included patients aged 19 years or older with histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic biliary tract cancer that had progressed on first-line gemcitabine plus cisplatin and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. By use of an interactive web-based response system integrated with an electronic data capture system, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using permuted blocks (block size 4) to receive either intravenous liposomal irinotecan (70 mg/m2 for 90 min) plus intravenous leucovorin (400 mg/m2 for 30 min) and intravenous fluorouracil (2400 mg/m2 for 46 h) every 2 weeks or leucovorin and fluorouracil only every 2 weeks, and were stratified by primary tumour site, previous surgery with curative intent, and participating centre. Study treatment was continued until the patient had disease progression or unacceptable toxicities, or withdrew consent. The primary endpoint was blinded independent central review (BICR)-assessed progression-free survival. The primary endpoint and safety were assessed in the full analysis set and the safety analysis set, respectively, both of which comprised all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of the study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03524508, and enrolment is complete. FINDINGS: Between Sept 5, 2018, and Feb 18, 2020, 193 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 174 (88 in the liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin group and 86 in the fluorouracil plus leucovorin group) were enrolled and included in the full analysis and safety analysis sets. At a median follow-up of 11·8 months (IQR 7·7-18·7), the median BICR-assessed progression-free survival was significantly longer in the liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin group (7·1 months, 95% CI 3·6-8·8) than in the fluorouracil and leucovorin group (1·4 months, 1·2-1·5; hazard ratio 0·56, 95% CI 0·39-0·81; p=0·0019). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (21 [24%] of 88 in the liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin group vs one [1%] of 86 in the fluorouracil and leucovorin group) and fatigue or asthenia (11 [13%] vs three [3%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 37 (42%) patients receiving liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin and 21 (24%) patients receiving fluorouracil and leucovorin. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: Adding liposomal irinotecan to fluorouracil and leucovorin significantly improved BICR-assessed progression-free survival in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin could be considered a standard-of-care second-line therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer. FUNDING: Servier and HK inno. N TRANSLATION: For the Korean translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Doripenem after Intravenous Infusion in Korean Patients with Acute Infections.

We investigated the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of doripenem in Korean patients with acute infections and determined an appropriate dosing regimen using a Monte Carlo simulation for predicting pharmacodynamics (PD). Patients (n = 37) with a creatinine clearance (CLCR) of 20 to 50 ml/min or >50 ml/min who received a 250-mg or 500-mg dose of doripenem over the course of 1 h every 8 h, respectively, were included in this study. Blood samples were taken predosing and 0 h, 0.5 h, and 4 to 6 h after the fourth infusion. A nonlinear mixed-effect modeling tool was used for the PK analysis and pharmacodynamic simulation; doripenem PK were well described by a one-compartment model. The population mean values of the body weight (WT)-normalized clearance (CL/WT) and the body weight-normalized volume of distribution (V/WT) were 0.109 liter/h/kg of body weight (relative standard error, 9.197%) and 0.280 liter/kg (relative standard error, 9.56%), respectively. Doripenem CL was significantly influenced by CLCR The proposed equation to estimate doripenem CL in Korean patients was CL/WT = 0.109 × WT × (CLCR/57)0.688, where CL/WT is in liters per hour per kilogram. CL in Korean patients was expected to be lower than that in Caucasian patients, regardless of renal function. The Monte Carlo simulation showed that 90% attainment of target PK/PD magnitudes could be achieved with the usual dosing regimens when the MIC was ≤1 mg/liter. However, prolonged infusions (4 h) should be considered, especially when patients have augmented renal function and for patients infected with pathogens with a high MIC. Our results provide an individualized doripenem dosing regimen for patients with various renal functions and for patients infected with bacteria with decreased susceptibility.