Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Br J Dermatol ; 179(2): 337-344, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29570772

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Aspirin may reduce the risk of several types of cancer. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if folic acid is associated with risk of basal cell carcinoma (BCC). METHODS: BCC incidence was evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of aspirin (81 mg daily or 325 mg daily for ~3 years) and/or folic acid (1 mg daily for ~6 years) for the prevention of colorectal adenomas among 1121 participants with a previous adenoma. BCC was confirmed by blinded review of pathology reports. RESULTS: One hundred and four of 958 non-Hispanic white participants were diagnosed with BCC over a median follow-up of 13·5 years. Cumulative incidence of BCC was 12% [95% confidence interval (CI) 7-17] for placebo, 16% (95% CI 11-21) for 81 mg aspirin daily and 15% (95% CI 10-20) for 325 mg aspirin daily [hazard ratio (HR) for any aspirin 1·45 (95% CI 0·93-2·26); HR for 81 mg daily 1·57 (95% CI 0·96-2·56); HR for 325 mg daily 1·33 (95% CI 0·80-2·20)]. BCC risk was higher with aspirin use in those without previous skin cancer but lower with aspirin use in those with previous skin cancer (Pinteraction = 0·02 for 81 mg aspirin daily; Pinteraction = 0·03 for 325 mg aspirin daily). Folic acid supplementation was unrelated to BCC incidence (HR 0·85; 95% CI 0·57-1·27). CONCLUSIONS: Neither aspirin nor folic acid treatment had a statistically significant effect on risk of BCC. Subgroup analysis suggested that chemopreventive effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may be specific to those at high risk for BCC.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma Basocelular/epidemiología , Ácido Fólico/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Adenoma/prevención & control , Anciano , Carcinoma Basocelular/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Basocelular/patología , Carcinoma Basocelular/prevención & control , Neoplasias Colorrectales/prevención & control , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo , Piel/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/prevención & control , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 6(1): 25-9, 1997 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8993794

RESUMEN

We conducted a nested case-control study of squamous cell skin cancer (SCC) to determine whether risk was related to plasma concentrations of selenium, alpha-tocopherol, beta-carotene, and retinol. We derived the study sample from participants in our Skin Cancer Prevention Study, all of whom had at least one basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer before study entry. Those who developed a new squamous cell skin cancer during the 3-5-year follow-up period were selected as cases (n = 132). Controls (n = 264) were chosen at random, with matching by age, sex, and study center, from among those who did not develop SCC but were being followed actively at the time the SCC case was diagnosed. Prediagnostic plasma samples were analyzed for alpha-tocopherol, beta-carotene, and retinol using high-performance liquid chromatography. Selenium determinations were made using instrumental neutron activation analysis. Odds ratios were computed using conditional logistic regression for matched samples. We found no consistent pattern of SCC risk associated with any of the nutrients examined. The odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for the highest versus the lowest quartiles of beta-carotene, retinol, alpha-tocopherol, and selenium were 0.73 (0.38-1.41), 1.43 (0.77-2.64), 0.89 (0.43-1.85), and 0.86 (0.47-1.58), respectively. Thus, our data add to the growing body of evidence that these nutrients, at the concentrations we evaluated, are not related strongly to SCC risk.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/sangre , Selenio/sangre , Neoplasias Cutáneas/sangre , Vitamina A/sangre , Vitamina E/sangre , beta Caroteno/sangre , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores de Riesgo
3.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 88(24): 1848-53, 1996 Dec 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8961975

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Human evidence that ionizing radiation is carcinogenic first came from reports of nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) on the hands of workers using early radiation devices. An increased risk of NMSC has been observed among uranium miners, radiologists, and individuals treated with x rays in childhood for tinea capitis (ringworm of the scalp) or for thymic enlargement; NMSC is one of the cancers most strongly associated with the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Although exposure to ionizing radiation is a known cause of NMSC, it is not yet clear whether therapeutic radiation causes both major histologic types of NMSC, basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Additionally, the potentially modifying effects, such as latency, age when treated, and type of treatment, are not well understood. PURPOSE: We investigated the relative risks of BCC and SCC associated with previous radiation therapy and evaluated these risks in relation to age and time since initial treatment and the medical condition for which radiation therapy was given. METHODS: The study group comprised individual diagnosed with at least one BCC or SCC from January 1980 through February 1986, who were recruited to participate in a skin cancer prevention trial designed to test whether oral beta-carotene supplementation would reduce the risk of new NMSCs. Patients were identified through the dermatology and pathology records of academic medical centers in Hanover, NH; Los Angeles, CA; San Francisco, CA; and Minneapolis, MN. Each participant completed a questionnaire detailing lifetime residence, pigmentary characteristics, occupational and recreational sun exposure, and history of radiation therapy. At enrollment, a study dermatologist assessed skin type (tendency to burn or tan) and extent of actinic skin damage. Participants were followed with an annual dermatologic examination for an average of 4 years. Of the 5232 potentially eligible individuals, 1805 were enrolled in the trial. We excluded 112 patients who reported previous radiation therapy for skin cancer only and three with missing information on whether they were ever treated with radiation therapy, leaving 1690 patients for the analysis. Approximately 4% of the patients died or discontinued participation for other reasons during each study year. We examined time to occurrence of first new histopathologically confirmed BCC and SCC during the follow-up period in relation to history of radiation therapy (for reasons other than NMSC) using a proportional hazards model. A multiple end points survival model was used to compare the rate ratios (RRs) for BCC and SCC. We also used a longitudinal method of analysis to compute the RR of total new BCC and SCC tumors per person per study year associated with radiation therapy. Using this method, we additionally assessed the potential modifying effects of age at treatment, latency, and type of therapy. All P values were derived from two-sided statistical tests of significance. RESULTS: Among the participants we studied, 597 developed a new BCC (n = 1553 tumors) and 118 developed a new SCC (n = 179 tumors). The time to first new BCC, but not SCC, was associated with prior radiation therapy (RR = 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.4-2.0 and RR = 1.0; 95% CI = 0.6-1.7, respectively; P = .03 for the difference between the RRs). The RR of total BCC tumors was slightly higher (RR = 2.3; 95% CI = 1.7-3.1), but it was still unity for SCC (RR = 1.0; 95% CI = 0.5-1.9). BCC risk appeared to increase with younger age at exposure and time since initially treated, although these effects were only marginally statistically significant (P for trend = .06 and .07, respectively). Also, risk of BCC was more strongly related to treatment for acne (RR = 3.3; 95% CI = 2.1-5.2) than other conditions. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our data suggest that exposure to therapeutic radiation is associated with BCC but not with SCC.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Basocelular/etiología , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/etiología , Radioterapia/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/etiología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo
4.
JAMA ; 275(9): 699-703, 1996 Mar 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8594267

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between beta carotene plasma concentration and beta carotene supplementation and risk of death from major disease causes. DESIGN: Cohort study of plasma concentrations; randomized, controlled clinical trial of supplementation. SETTING: Medical school-affiliated dermatology practices. PATIENTS: A total of 1188 men and 532 women with mean age of 63.2 years, who had enrolled in a randomized clinical trial of beta carotene supplementation to prevent nonmelanoma skin cancer. INTERVENTION: Oral beta carotene, 50 mg per day for a median of 4.3 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All-cause mortality and mortality from cardiovascular disease and cancer. RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 8.2 years, there were 285 deaths. Persons whose initial plasma beta carotene concentrations were in the highest quartile (>0.52 micromol/L [27.7 microg/dL]) had a lower risk of death from all causes (adjusted relative rate [RR], 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44 to 0.87) and from cardiovascular diseases (adjusted RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.95) compared with persons with initial concentrations in the lowest quartile (<0.21 micromol/L [11.2 microg/dL]). Patients randomly assigned to beta carotene supplementation showed no reduction in relative mortality rates from all causes (adjusted RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.30) or from cardiovascular disease (adjusted RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.64). There was no evidence of lower mortality following supplementation among patients with initial beta carotene concentrations below the median for the study group. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses provide no support for a strong effect of supplemental beta carotene in reducing mortality from cardiovascular disease or other causes. Although the possibility exists that beta carotene supplementation produces benefits that are too small or too delayed to have been detected in this study, noncausal explanations should be sought for the association between plasma concentrations of beta carotene and diminished risk of death.


Asunto(s)
Carotenoides/administración & dosificación , Carotenoides/sangre , Mortalidad , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Cutáneas/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA