Phototherapy: Theory and practice.

Despite the development of highly effective biologics for skin diseases such as psoriasis or atopic dermatitis, UVA and UVB therapy, alone or in combination, are still essential components of various guidelines. Phototherapy is not only a first-line treatment and highly effective for a number of skin diseases, but is also economical and has few side effects. The targeted use of UVA and UVB, if necessary, in combination with the photosensitizer psoralen in the context of PUVA therapy, enables the dermatologist to effectively treat a wide variety of skin diseases. Indications for phototherapy include epidermal diseases such as atopic dermatitis, psoriasis and vitiligo, as well as photodermatoses, mycosis fungoides, graft-versus-host disease and deep dermal diseases such as scleroderma. This article reviews the physical principles, molecular mechanisms, current treatment regimens, and individual indications for phototherapy and photochemotherapy.

Biological effects of a new ultraviolet A1 prototype based on light-emitting diodes on the treatment of localized scleroderma.

Ultraviolet A1 (UVA1 ) phototherapy (spectral range 340-400 nm) is a well-established treatment option for various skin diseases such as localized scleroderma. Recent improvements of conventional UVA1 light sources (metal-halide or fluorescent lamps) have brought attention to a new light-emitting diode (LED) technology with remarkable advantages in handling and clinical routine. This study provides a preclinical histological and molecular evaluation of an LED-based UVA1 prototype with a narrower spectral range (360-400 nm) for treating localized scleroderma. Scleroderma mouse models and fibroblasts in vitro were exposed to LED-based UVA1 phototherapy or to irradiation with a commercially available metal-halide lamp emitting low-dose (20, 40 J/cm2 ), medium-dose (60 J/cm2 ) and high-dose (80, 100 J/cm2 ) UVA1 light. Both UVA1 light sources affected inflammatory genes (IL-1α and IL-6) and growth factors (TGFß-1 and TGFß-2). Increased collagen type 1 was reduced after UVA1 phototherapy. Matrix metalloproteinase-1 was more enhanced after a medium dose of LED-based UVA1 phototherapy than after conventional treatment. In vivo, dermal thickness and the amount of collagen were reduced after both treatment methods. Remarkably, myofibroblasts were more effectively reduced by a medium dose of LED-based UVA1 phototherapy. The study indicates that LED-based UVA1 phototherapy yields similar or even better results than conventional treatment. In terms of biosafety and patient comfort, LED-based UVA1 phototherapy offers clear advantages over conventional treatment because of the use of a narrower and less harmful UVA1 spectrum, less heat generation and shorter treatment times at the same irradiation intensity. Clinical studies are required to confirm these results in patients with localized scleroderma.

Phototherapy-induced elevation of serum level of melanoma inhibitory activity.

BACKGROUND: Phototherapy is a frequently used treatment modality for a variety of dermatologic diseases. UV radiation has different effects on the skin, for example increased production and release of cytokines and other proteins, and is involved in the initiation and progression of skin cancer. Objective of this clinical trial was to investigate potential systemic effects of UV phototherapy on cytokine profiles in blood. METHODS: In a prospective, mono-centric, one-armed study, the serum levels of the melanoma tumour marker "melanoma inhibitory activity" (MIA), Il-1α, Il-4, Il-6, Il-10, TNF-α and IFN-γ of 115 patients with different skin diseases were compared before and 24-48 hours as well as 2-4 weeks after the first phototherapy with PUVA (psoralen and ultraviolet A), UVA or UVB, or both. Data were analysed using linear mixed models. RESULTS: Estimated marginal means of MIA levels were 6.05 ng/mL (95%-CI: 5.37-6.72, range: 2.83-14.49) before the first treatment, which had significantly increased to 6.79 ng/mL 2-4 weeks after the first phototherapy (CI 95%: 6.12-7.47, range: 3.09-15.45; P = 0.0042). MIA levels 2-4 weeks after the first phototherapy were significantly higher than 24-48 hours after the first phototherapy (P = 0.0083). 2-4 weeks after the first treatment, TNF-α levels had decreased significantly (P = 0.033) more in patients with psoriasis who had responded well to phototherapy than in patients unresponsive to treatment. Serum levels of the other cytokines had not changed significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term phototherapy significantly increased the serum levels of the melanoma tumour marker MIA. The potential clinical relevance of these findings (ie an increased risk of melanoma) is unclear and should be further investigated.

Pityriasis rubra pilaris: a review of diagnosis and treatment.

Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) is a rare inflammatory dermatosis of unknown etiology, and finding a successful therapy can be challenging. PRP occurs equally in men and women. In some patients, associated autoimmune diseases, infections, or malignancies are possible trigger factors. PRP shows a bimodal age distribution, peaking in the first as well as in the fifth to sixth decade. Its classification into five subgroups is based on age at onset, clinical course, morphologic features, and prognosis. More than 50% of patients are best classified as type I with adult-onset PRP. This form is also characterized by high spontaneous remission rates (80%) within 1-3 years. Clinically, the classical adult (type I) and classical juvenile (type III) forms appear to be the same except for the patient's age. Recently, the designation of a new category of PRP (type VI) has been proposed that is characterized by the presence of HIV infection with different clinical features and a poorer prognosis. Typical morphologic features of PRP are erythematosquamous salmon-colored plaques with well demarcated islands of unaffected skin. Often, keratoderma of the palms and soles is present. In patients with extensive disease, ectropion is a dreaded complication. Histology shows hyperkeratosis, alternating orthokeratosis and parakeratosis in a checkerboard pattern, and focal acantholytic dyskeratosis. Descriptions and therapeutic experiences are mainly based on case reports. Mostly, systemic retinoids, methotrexate, and other immunosuppressive agents as well as UV light therapy are applied, with varying response rates. In recent years, treatment with so-called 'biologics' is becoming more and more popular for treating recalcitrant PRP. We present a review of the clinical features, histopathologic findings, classification, differential diagnoses, and treatment of PRP.

Adjuvant photodynamic therapy does not prevent recurrence of condylomata acuminata after carbon dioxide laser ablation-A phase III, prospective, randomized, bicentric, double-blind study.

BACKGROUND: Recurrence after therapy for anogenital warts, or condylomata acuminata (CA), is common. Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) using 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) is efficient in the treatment of CA, but one problem with PDT is the limited penetration depth of photosensitizer and light. Pre-PDT vaporization of CA using a carbon dioxide (CO(2)) laser may enhance efficacy. OBJECTIVES: CO(2) laser ablation was followed by ALA-PDT in a phase III prospective randomized bicenter double-blind study to prevent recurrence of CA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-five patients with CA received CO(2) laser vaporization plus adjuvant ALA-PDT (n=84) or adjuvant placebo-PDT (n=91). A 20% ALA or placebo ointment was applied to the CA area 4 to 6 hours before CO(2) laser vaporization, followed by illumination with red light (600-740 nm, 100 mW/cm(2), 100 J/cm(2)). RESULTS: Cumulative recurrence rate 12 weeks after treatment was 50.0% in the ALA-PDT group, versus 52.7% in the placebo-PDT group (p=.72). No statistically significant difference between groups was detected with regard to recurrence rates up to 12 months after treatment. No major complications were observed. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant ALA-PDT of CA after CO(2) laser ablation was well tolerated, but no significant difference with regard to recurrence rate was observed from CO(2) laser vaporization alone.